MMO-Champion - Silverpine Forest, Blue Posts, MMO Report
Cataclysm - Silverpine Forest Update
I added a couple of beta screenshots to the Silverpine Forest page. I didn't decide if I should spoil major lore events or not, but if you're wondering what's the story behind the 2nd and 3rd screenshot you can always check out this post.

If you're not interested in spoilers, just don't click those shots and scroll down to the blue posts.







Blue posts
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
Old Dungeons in Cataclysm
The old dungeons are getting some love, including some new quests. (Source)

Leveling with a Healing spec
We are going to make leveling easier for healing specs. You still shouldn't expect to do anywhere near the damage of a dps spec though (otherwise, why would you ever level as dps?).

You can use your healing spec to use Dungeon Finder as you level. [...] But even if you don't use dungeons, you can level with a healer spec. I've done it a few times -- it's not super fast, but it's not horribly broken either, and it will be better in Cataclysm. (Source)

Pet scaling and Mastery bonus
We can make the pet damage scale with mastery even if they aren't getting the same benefit you are (because in many cases that won't make sense). (Source)

Not enough build choices in the new trees?
WoW shipped with trees roughly the size the ones Cataclysm will be and I don't recall a lot of players at the time thinking that there weren't enough choices.

In terms of pure numbers, the new trees offer fewer maximum number of combinations than the old ones. But many of the old combinations were not viable ones anyway. The new design is fewer meaningful choices rather than having lots of trivial (or even bad) choices. (Source)

Exponential inflation of stats
You're confusing relative to absolute effects in a couple of cases here. It is not harder to balance big numbers. Math works the same way on big numbers as it does on small numbers. It's harder to balance big numbers to small numbers, which might be a problem if we expected say level 85 characters to PvP against level 35 characters, but that's not how we design the game. It isn't important to us at all that level 75 characters can hold their own vs. level 80 characters. It's more fun to become more powerful as you level rather than see only slight improvements in your stats.

Fresh level 85 content won't be trivialized by level 85 characters until a new patch comes out, at which point it's not fresh content any longer.

The point I think has the most merit is your point A, but I think that one is a worthy sacrifice in order to be able to provide more content and a sense of progression to existing characters.

There's a magic number that we've found over time to feel satisfying to players, and that's about the 13 item level jump between tiers of content. When the numbers are less than that, players see for example their health only go up by 10 or 100 points, which doesn't feel meaningful. They don't feel rewarded for their efforts and have less interest in doing the quests or dungeons or the new PvP season. If players gain a level or two and still have trouble with that raptor that gave them a hard time before, then they don't feel like the process of improving their character is worth it. Everything else is derived for the need to have that meaningful jump. (Source)

Hunter (Forums / 3.3.5 Talent Calculator)
Hunters in Cataclysm
Chimera vs. Arcane – Chimera should have a higher DPCT/damage than Arcane as a tradeoff for having a cooldown. You should be casting Chimera before Arcane in any situation where it's not on cooldown. There numbers may not be tuned quite right yet.

Serpent Sting – You’ll find it's not efficient to cast your damage-over-time on targets that die before Serpent Sting lasts the full duration. This is similar to other classes. Druids don’t use all of their bleeds on targets that die in 8 seconds; it's just not efficient. Chimera refreshing Serpent Sting is a bonus for fights that take longer, like boss fights or “epic” creatures. It isn’t factored into the “budget” of the ability, so don’t feel like you wasted a Chimera just because you couldn’t utilize the “refresh Serpent Sting” mechanic.

Tranq Shot – We want this to have a focus cost. There may be opportunities where you want to use two Tranqs in a row, and it's your decision if you want to do that or not. I think most Hunters dislike it having a focus cost because they feel their raid leaders may mandate them to dispel something on an encounter, and because they have to spend focus it sucks because you lose DPS. That's legitimate, but also the same kind of decision that a lot of other classes have to make.

Venoms – We hear you on some of their issues. We might try things like giving them some damage, reducing the focus cost, and / or have them last 5 minutes on PvE creatures. Again, shooting a Venom isn’t really ideal on targets that you kill quickly. You shouldn’t cast one on every trash mob, for example. That said, we don’t want them to become too “maintenance-y” on boss fights.

Aspects – We would like Aspect of the Fox to be as good as it can be, which we feel is 30%. Any higher than that and we lose the Steady Shot focus-generating gameplay. It seems that some hunters are, not surprisingly, somewhat turned off from doing less damage while moving as they are on live, but this is intended. A ranged class that can do almost as much damage moving as it can standing still is not going to be fair, and often is what restricts us from doing cool things with the class.

Trap Launcher – We'd like to take it off the GCD. (Source)


Paladin (Forums / 3.3.5 Talent Calculator)
Holy Paladins in LK
I'm exaggerating slightly here, but our LK model for Holy paladins was that they could only do one thing well so they might as well be overpowered at it. We could essentially just balance incoming tank damage around outgoing paladin healing. The paladin niche was very small, so if they weren't good at single target and mostly tank healing, they'd be replaced. Yet because it was small, there wasn't much risk of overstacking them as healers.

That model worked okay but it ultimately wasn't what we wanted, so we're going to change it in Cataclysm as much as we can without all of the healers playing identically. You should feel more comfortable having a paladin heal the raid and a druid heal the tank than most groups typically do now. (Source)

Forbearance
It will be reevaluated. (Source)

Warrior (Forums / 3.3.5 Talent Calculator)
Sunder Armor
Making Sunder do damage just felt too much like Devastate. [...] I've seen suggestions to have something you normally hit renew a Sunder. That might be the kind of thing we mess around with. (Source)

Enrage proc from damage done?
Is there any chance this means the talent Enrage in the fury tree will proc off of damage done instead of damage taken? It seems unlikely warriors will be able to pick up Wrecking Crew with the new talent system, so I think the fury signature Enrage should work the way fury does; dealing damage. Not taking it.
It's possible, but Fury also has Bloodrage, Berserker Rage and Death Wish. If Enrage included AE damage it would proc a lot more in PvE too. Like I said above, we want Fury to be angry a lot, but not 100% of the time so we may need to tweak things to get to that point. (Source)

Enrage-linked attack (Source)
We are experimenting with an attack linked to enrage. Fury has a lot of ways to get angry now, and it has good synergy with their mastery and distinction from Arms.

Please this, but don't consume the enrages. Requiring a rage to activate is fine, like GC said, fury warriors have lots of ways to get angry. But losing an 18% damage increasing enrage which we are balanced around having up 100% of the time is not worth an attack. Unless it is made so that it can only consume specific enrages (Blood Craze, Bloodthirst, etc.)
Yeah, I actually think it's cooler if the enrage is not consumed. When you give up damage over time for sudden damage, it turns out to be a math problem, and you can see lots of examples where we've ended up reverting or letting you talent out of a "consumes the charges" mechanic. If Fury isn't enraged 100% of the time (but isn't enraged 5% of the time either), and they have an attack that can only be used when enraged, but can be used frequently at that time, then you might have a pretty interesting rotation.

Arms is a gladiator, Fury is half naked (Sorry. Don't hate me warriors!)
We view Arms as a soldier, like a career military infantryman. Think Gladiator. We view Fury as the wild berserker from up in the hills. Think Braveheart or Conan. It's easy to argue that bleeds or mobility fit one or the other depending on your point of view. Arms feels tactical (in the sense of having an answer for various situations) and Fury feels reckless. The Arms warrior has pet names for all his weapons, while the Fury warrior shows up for battle drunk and half clothed. (Source)

The MMO Report
Just like every week, it's time for the MMO Report.

This article was originally published in forum thread: Silverpine Forest, Blue Posts, MMO Report started by Boubouille View original post
Comments 85 Comments
  1. Qso's Avatar
    anyone who thinks the game is less fun class wise than vanilla is insane. the game as a whole i could see valid arguments both ways - but go play a vanilla feral or any other hybrid for that matter.
  1. Lorthiros's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Stiffen View Post
    Maybe the enrage on being hit is for the baddies, you know the ones who pull 1k dps and arent hit capped? The reasoning behind blizzard is that since most baddies choose to stand in front of bosses, taking cleaves, standing in Void zones and the like...it will infact benefit the raid by making these baddies basically enraged ALL the time causing good dps.

    Although your healers may want to kill themselves mid run....if the stress and anxiety doesnt shut down their hearts first
    No. Just no.
  1. deplorable's Avatar
    Sylvannas did what she has to, to maintain the population of her people... i mean when you first started out in the forsaken starting area. You're pretty much in a crypt and just died becoming forsaken.. i fail to see the difference between this and raising humans as forsaken.

    only difference is there was no plague involved from the 2nd, but as you've seen in becoming a Death Knight where you kill the person you knew in a previous life as a DK, they try and make you remember your previous life and YOUR ARE NOT A MONSTER. (even at that time, you were pretty much a mindless slave of the lich king).

    So i fail to see the issue, if she doesn't find a way to make more forsaken there won't be a faction at all. And it'll be a weak chain in the horde especially with the focus being War. They wouldn't be able to hold territory or face a siege (especially with losses sustained from the rebellion and war in nothrend).

    All she's doing is bringing humans back from the dead and giving them a new chance as one of the forsaken. They have their own minds and souls, they essentially become a starting player.

    necromancy is mostly about binding souls to the necromancer, so the undead become mindless servants. she isn't doing necromancy as such, she's just raising the population of the forsaken (not the scourge, as she hates those with a passion).

    for the dark lady.
  1. SandWorm's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by deplorable View Post
    Sylvannas did what she has to, to maintain the population of her people... i mean when you first started out in the forsaken starting area. You're pretty much in a crypt and just died becoming forsaken.. i fail to see the difference between this and raising humans as forsaken.

    only difference is there was no plague involved from the 2nd, but as you've seen in becoming a Death Knight where you kill the person you knew in a previous life as a DK, they try and make you remember your previous life and YOUR ARE NOT A MONSTER. (even at that time, you were pretty much a mindless slave of the lich king).

    So i fail to see the issue, if she doesn't find a way to make more forsaken there won't be a faction at all. And it'll be a weak chain in the horde especially with the focus being War. They wouldn't be able to hold territory or face a siege (especially with losses sustained from the rebellion and war in nothrend).

    All she's doing is bringing humans back from the dead and giving them a new chance as one of the forsaken. They have their own minds and souls, they essentially become a starting player.

    necromancy is mostly about binding souls to the necromancer, so the undead become mindless servants. she isn't doing necromancy as such, she's just raising the population of the forsaken (not the scourge, as she hates those with a passion).

    for the dark lady.
    Here, I think you touch on the central issue of creation of new Forsaken: whether or not the corpses Sylvannas reanimates are a product of the Forsaken or their allies killing someone living.

    The way I see it, IF the Forsaken simply approached a living race with a deal: "We'll give you the option that if you die naturally, by accident or by violence against someone besides us, we'll bring you back as one of us provided you consent to it." then replenishment of the Forsaken population would be fine and dandy for alot of folks.

    HOWEVER, seeing as the Forsaken are assaulting Gilneas, I very much doubt anyone they're raising died from anything other than by Forsaken hands. It doesn't seem very possible that anyone consented to becoming new Forsaken here.

    I sympathize for the Forsaken, as I'd be pissed off too for being murdered and brought back as a cadaverous slave, only to be shunned by my countrymen upon regaining my free will. Though, if further developments continue to point to them intending to just kill everyone who's alive so that they can reanimate them as more Forsaken, I say "Beware the Living" indeed because I'll be ready to send them into the Afterlife they're apparantly too much of cowards to enter themselves.
  1. Salz's Avatar
    It's funny how many people seem to think that the only race in the Horde are orcs and therefore all orc lore suddenly becomes Horde lore. They may have been the main driving force behind the formation of the Horde but it's best to remember that several races make up the collective there weren't any tauren guzzling down vats of demon blood were there? Perhaps it is good that Blizzard are pushing the other races to have greater roles in what direction the factions take. I mean when was the last time that any gnomes/dwaves/draenei shaped Alliance politics, probably as often as the tauren or trolls have.

    I don't necessarily like what Sylvanas is up to but at least she's not sitting around up a tree with her finger up her nose wondering when her boyfriend will wake up. The guys at Blizzard really need to spice up the Alliance goings on seriously, all the way through WoTLK we've had the various Horde short falls/angst/tendency to murder giving some sense action the whole back story and even though Varian came back they didn't really run with it apart from a few arguments with Garrosh or Thrall, bring the rest of the Alliance in from the cold.

    This game is World of Warcraft not Orcs Vs Humans that was a few years ago now.

Site Navigation