MMO-Champion - Ask The Devs #9 - Tanking
Ask The Devs #9 - Tanking
Originally Posted by Blizzard (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)
Q: Vengeance is a great tool to help raid tanks hold aggro over DPS, but in 5-man heroics it doesn't stack high enough to keep up with the threat generated by overgeared DPS burst damage. Are there any plans to address this? Are there any plans to help warriors put out more initial threat before Vengeance has been ramped up? – Nikelsndimes (NA), Cémanana (EU-FR), Arthur (TW), Mancake (NA), Migol (NA)

A: We think Vengeance works well overall. It provides sufficient threat without causing the tank to do more DPS than the dedicated DPS characters, and doesn’t let the tank just neglect abilities that cause threat. A full stack of Vengeance probably provides too much threat, but we didn’t think it was necessary to nerf that mid-expansion. Overall, we don’t want tanks to have 100% guaranteed threat on a pull, so we don’t want to buff that aspect of Vengeance, but we also don’t want DPS specs to constantly have to throttle the DPS they can deliver midway through a fight, so we have to strike a balance.

Note: There are fights with tank swaps or incoming adds, or similar mechanics, when threat may matter mid-fight. This is intended – encounter design varies widely.


Q: Have you considered normalizing initial Rage for feral druid tanks? For example, when a warrior uses Charge, it generates 15 points of Rage, which lets them use another aggro generating ability quickly, something that Feral druids tend to be a bit short on. Why in Cataclysm was the bear bonus health pool was reduced, as well? Their survivability always depended on the amount of health since they don’t have parry or shield block. Do you have any plans to improve bear tanking in the future? At the moment, it’s considered to be the weakest tank. Have you considered giving druid tanks an additional tool to pull casters at range? It’s the only tank class that doesn’t have a talent or spell to help in those situations. – Pødêrøsø (LA), Вирко (EU-RU), Амелья (EU-RU), Condenacion (EU-ES), Whitewnd (KR)

A: Bears are getting a significant mitigation buff in 4.2 and we’re retuning their damage such that it’s a little easier to hold aggro at low gear levels, and a little harder at higher gear levels. While we definitely don’t expect the community to ever agree on anything, we’ve seen little evidence of a widespread concurrence that druids are “the weakest tank.” There are plenty of druid tanks out there, handling everything from Grim Batol to Sinestra. Tank balance overall is in a really good place. Players may focus on potential problems that could arise in the future but we also have ample time to address those problems should they occur. Gone are the days when we would just release a class into the wild and refuse to touch it again until the next expansion.


Q: What are your intentions with each tank's mastery and mastery in general? – Migol (NA)

A: Mastery is intended to be a defensive stat for tanks. We want it to be at least in the same ballpark of value per rating as avoidance. To go into a bit more depth on each tank:

Death Knights: We’re pretty happy with how mastery has turned out. It does have the oddity that it scales down in value with your mitigation, but also up in value with your health. But it does indeed scale up pretty smoothly in value, and doesn’t have any unintuitive breakpoints or anything, so we’re happy with it.

Druids: We’re pretty happy with how mastery has turned out. It scales well, doesn’t have any unintuitive or unfortunate interactions with other stats, and provides solid performance value.

Paladins: Mastery is an attractive stat for paladins, but has some design problems. It scales very well, but due to the nature of our combat tables (and being able to “fill them up”), you can get “block capped,” which is a massive performance benefit. Worse, Protection mastery scales with itself, since there are no diminishing returns on block chance, and the amount of rating you need to block cap goes down as your dodge and parry improve, allowing you to put even more of your stats into dodge or parry. This sort of feedback loop is something we always try to stay away from, so we plan to change this in the future. We tried several alternatives for 4.2, but weren’t happy with the results. Any change which made mastery weaker (such as subjecting block to diminishing returns or changing what it does) would have required mitigation compensation for paladins elsewhere (with all the design risks inherent in making such changes), as well as asking many players to extensively re-gem or re-forge. We’ll ask players to do that when the need is great, but we didn’t think this problem crossed that line. The major risks are that Protection paladins become too powerful or too weak or that gear with mastery will at some point be rejected once characters are over the cap. We don’t think any of those problems will manifest themselves in the 4.2 content.

Warriors: Warriors’ mastery is in a similar boat as paladins’, except that it still provides a notable benefit past the cap and scales much slower, making it much more difficult to “block cap.” That delays, but doesn’t remove the problem.


Q: Will we see a tanking Legendary sometime soon? – Pedoso (NA)

A: The tanking community both loves and hates when this question comes up, but it received a lot of votes, so we’ll answer it. The answer is not soon, but probably eventually. The problem with tanking legendaries, of course, is that the shield-users and non-shield-users tank with different weapons. That’s not a deal breaker, but it is a consideration. We could allow the legendary to be transformed from a one-hander to two-hander or we could just design an item for a more narrow audience (such as a shield). The 4.2 legendary has fairly wide appeal, and the 4.3 legendary will have much more narrow appeal. We don’t want to fall into the trap of making legendaries too formulaic.


Q: Are there any plans to teach players in-game how to tank when they are at an early stage, or at least at some point in the leveling process? – Romner (EU-EN)

A: A system to teach players how we intend for them to perform their roles is something we realize we’re lacking. We have some pretty cool plans to help solve this problem in the future, but we’re not quite ready to make any announcements, and Ask the Devs just wouldn’t be the appropriate venue anyway.


Q: Do you plan to bring other tanks to the same level as Death Knights who have a lot of advantages over other tanking classes (easier to heal, quite a number of various safe abilities, etc.)? - Меланори (EU-RU)

A: Death knights are a somewhat different style of tank compared to the others. They take significantly more damage than other tanks, but then heal/shield that extra damage back instead (and sometimes more). Due to taking more damage, and that damage coming in spikes, they’re also the most likely to die to unexpected burst (such as when they don’t have runes up to Death Strike, have no cooldowns available, and fail to dodge or parry a few attacks in a row. They also have more personal impact on their own survivability and mitigation than any other tank, by tying much of their performance to Death Strike (and especially optimally timing their Death Strikes). So in the hands of a really skilled player, they can do some amazing things, but not usually much better than the other tanks. We’d actually like to head more in that direction with the other tanks (making them tie more of their defensive performance to their ability usage), in the future.


Q: Is there any chance that we can see damage reduction numbers being used in the statistic UI, just like shield absorb amount of Discipline priest? – 首領先生 (TW)

A: The default UI should show the damage reduction from armor against a creature of equal level. We’ll look into also showing the damage reduction against a +1, +2, +3/boss-level mob, like we do for hit or expertise. Beyond that, there is typically passive damage reduction from talents/stance/presence/etc., which should be relatively easy to combine with armor to find your damage reduction.


Q: Have you ever considered adjusting DPS HP? Seems that while their large pools of health help them on "accidental" situations, a fair portion of the time they can take aggro and tank adds without consequence. – Jainel (LA)

A: We’re generally happy with how well DPS are able to tank (which is to say, not very well). We like that they can take a hit or two (depending upon content) before dying, and that the penalty for that happening is a huge drain on healer mana.


Q: As far as I remember, about five tanks were required in a 25-man group in Burning Crusade. However, the number of tanks in raids has been decreased to one or two since WotLK. I think this is one of the reasons heroic parties suffer from lack of tanks. What if raids have required more tanks? – 명장한니발 (KR)

A: We don’t actually recall many four+ tank fights in Burning Crusade, and that includes fights like High King Maulgar where non-tanks could perform the tanking role. While we do find some elegance in a design where a 5-player group scales perfectly up to a 10 and 25-player group, that introduces some problems as well. It could potentially extend the tank shortage we see in 5-player dungeons up to raids (to be fair, it’s also possible needing more tanks for raiding would create more tanks for dungeons). A larger problem is that we just don’t want to over-constrain encounter design to always require 4 or 5 tanks. Sometimes it’s nice to have a fight that’s just a single bruiser without requiring a tank swap or meteor-style cleave. Nearly every raid fight in Cataclysm asks for two tank-specced characters, with a few requiring one or three. That’s likely the model we will continue to use. If we wanted to do a fight with many tanks, we’d likely let some of the DPS specs step in.


Q:Are there any plans to update the leg armor in 4.2 now that the plate tanks receive no dodge from agility? Maybe introduce a new leg armor patch that adds str/stamina, or a mastery/stamina? – Dariok (NA), Fredik (EU-ES)

A: We did. As you’ve probably seen by now, it’s called Drakehide Leg Armor, and it provides Stamina and dodge rating.


Q: Can you make it so that taunt doesn't miss, just like you did for interrupt abilities? Doesn't feel as though it would be a complete upset to overall balance. – Madmartygan (LA)

A: Yes, absolutely! And in fact we did it back in patch 3.9. Tank classes’ taunts have been unable to miss since then. We recognize that tanks will nearly always choose mitigation stats over threat stats and it’s particularly frustrating to have to reach a hit cap just to make sure taunts or interrupts don’t miss, which is why we no longer require that.


Q: Are there any plans to simplify the impossible situation for tanks (8% hit rating, 26 Expertise but all defensive stats at max at the same time) somehow, either through stats on gear or through changes to the game mechanics? Have you considered giving tools to tanks to allow easier capping of hit and expertise to help with threat management? – Sunyara (EU-DE), Gilbey (EU-ES)

A: We don’t currently balance around the assumption that tanks cap hit or expertise. We’re definitely looking at ways to make reliably hitting more attractive to tanks in the future, though. Currently, missing is just a compound to the issue discussed in Question #1. Getting tanks to care about threat stats, not for the threat benefit (but for a mitigation benefit), is one potential direction. For example, DKs want to make sure their Death Strikes hit because of the mitigation benefit. Druids care about crit because of Savage Defense. We speculated at one point that we could make Shield Block (and now Holy Shield) require a successful hit to do their jobs. We’re not sure we will go that direction, but it’s one idea. We would of course compensate tanks for any potential loss of predictable mitigation.


Q: Compared to DKs, Paladins are weaker when facing mass magic attacks. A Paladin has no choice but to stack stamina in this situation. Is there any change coming to this for Paladins? – 新垣綾瀨 (TW)

A: We don’t balance tanks around their sustained magic damage reduction, since we don’t typically assault tanks with continuous magic damage. We do frequently intersperse physical damage with a burst of magic damage, usually timed around the cooldowns that all tanks have available, and find that that is balanced. If we ever did a fight like Hydross again where there is almost no physical damage, we’d have to explore some other options.


Q: At the moment, tanks need to use addons to see threat levels and clearly see which mobs they have aggro with. With all the recent changes and updates being made to the UI, are there any plans to make seeing threat levels and aggro easier and clearer? – Castan (EU-EN)

A: We’d definitely like to build threat into the UI more, especially for tanks and for multiple targets. We try to keep our default UI relatively unobtrusive so that players can see the actual battlefield, but we realize this design goal can come into conflict with players’ need or desire to have copious amounts of information displayed. Finding the right compromise is something we wrestle with constantly and one reason why our UI changes tend to come more slowly than, say, class design changes.


Q: Protection Paladin is not only the most desired tank because survival abilities for groups and various utilities, but players also generally consider Paladins as an indispensable Class in raids. I know all tanking Classes are being equalized constantly, but survival abilities of Protection Paladins give huge advantages compared to other tanking Classes. Can we expect that other Tanking classes will see more survival abilities for groups in terms of equity? – 디아소르테 (KR)

A: Like druids, paladins have the enormous benefit of being able to fill all three roles in a group. Paladins also retain a wide variety of buff and utility abilities from vanilla when they (and shaman) were more of a support class that was intended to have low individual throughput but made other classes in the group shine. We have been slowly moving away from that design in our effort to avoid class stacking and support the “bring the player, not the class” philosophy, but it’s hard to move quickly on changes like this. (As one small example, we briefly removed Lay on Hands during Cataclysm development, and there was an outcry even from within the team.) Because they can fill many roles and still provide a lot of utility, it’s not surprising that you see a lot of druids and paladins in your raid groups. We’ve tried very hard to not make any particular tank class mandatory, and we feel we’ve been pretty successful in Cataclysm. So far we haven’t seen an encounter like Sartharion or Anub’arak where a certain tank class was perceived, probably accurately, as necessary for progression.

Protection paladins do bring a lot of utility, but it is quite difficult to make a table comparing a paladin’s Divine Guardian to a Protection warrior’s mobility or a bear druid’s ability to cast Innervate or even Rebirth during lulls in an encounter. They are fundamentally different abilities that have greater or less utility depending on the encounter and your individual raid comp. We don’t want to just hand out a Divine Guardian equivalent to every tank class, just like we don’t think warriors or paladins need the ability to battle rez. It’s a fine line to walk. Homogenization really rankles some players (as it should), but being unable to tank (or heal, or DPS) an encounter because of lack of tools is equally unacceptable to many players.


Q: Is there any plan to add a new tank class in the future? I think spell breaker in the Warcraft III is an awesome choice for that! – 聖淇淋 (TW)

A: We’ll add new classes when the time is right. We don’t see WoW as a game that can support unlimited different class types (and the different talent specs almost behave as full classes these days!), so we want to be judicious about when we add classes. One of the challenges with tanks (and other roles) especially, is this: on the one hand, there is a core set of abilities that any tank needs in order to perform their job, especially in a 5-player dungeon where you can’t rely on other players in the same role to help cover your deficiencies. On the other hand, having so many similar abilities (e.g. a taunt, a short cooldown, an efficient heal) necessitates a certain amount of homogeneity among those classes. But what players (and designers!) really want in a new class is something exciting that no one has seen before. Adding another class that tanked just like a warrior wouldn’t add much to the game – it wouldn’t drive many new tanks or encourage a veteran tank to try a different tanking class. On the other hand, adding the death knight, who tanks relatively differently (though some players might argue still not differently enough) was an enormous challenge and the kind of thing we continue to tweak over time.
This article was originally published in forum thread: Ask The Devs #9 - Tanking started by Boubouille View original post
Comments 132 Comments
  1. Tevious's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by MysticalOS View Post
    main warrior alt paladin tank. both raiding heroic content. I was hugely disapointed not to see the qaustion about warrior threat being so much lower then paladins, and paladins being lower then DKs. it'd dispicable how much threat DKs generate on the pull with abiities that cannot be dodged/parried while us paladins/warriors go "aww hell CS missed twice in a row sigh" or "shield slam missed and is not recastable when it misses" etc...misses/parries are really the bane of pull threat, but doing calculations you'd literally have to reforge EVERY peice of gear you have into hit/expertise to even get the 26/8 goal, and that won't even solve the parry problem. I miss when tanks got passive expertise in their tree just for being a class that had to dps from the front all the time. :\

    the answer to the vengeance question was also dodgy at best. they said apsolutely nothing whenever someone asks about that. pull threat isn't just dicey for 10 seconds, on my warrior doing everything right on a pull, can simply get unlucky and not have control of threat for a full minute, and you can't taunt when someoen pulls either cause the temp threat is still higher then the person who is already over 110, so you can't taunt until that drops, and hope you're fsat enough not to let that frost dk or ret paladin die. or maybe you strike up a deal with mage buddy to go all out on pull with image up, way pass your threat, then taunt off him for the 1000k lead that gives you.

    at least when it comes to aoe though my warrior rapes the Dks face. my single target threat is lowest of 4 tank classes without a doubt but aoe i haven't met a tank class that can beat blood thunder deep wounds build with double dots on everything, all while cleaving and shockwaving and thunderclaping like mad. then that mob that can disarm shields in BoT kills me cause i had all 6 mobs on me (whats up with that anwyays? before 4.1 he'd only disarm weapon, now weapon and shield making tanking him for a warrior/paladin really suck).

    /rant
    Gonna keep ranting.

    It's quite dangerous for a tankswap fight to be a bear, without any vengeance up our mastery doesn't give crap for the first couple of seconds so initial damage on a pull/tank swap is scary shit
  1. barkles's Avatar
    wow, some of these questions are REALLY stupid!!! I'd like to see them answer questions from people that actually know their class....
  1. rayrn's Avatar
    ooh legendary in 4.3. Looking foreward to that, guessing a Healer item as we just had 2 DPS legendaries in a row and they said it's not gonna be a tanking item
  1. Freese's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Vasz View Post
    If they have 11.5 million subs world wide, at £9 each that's £1,035,000,000 a year. Just over a billion pounds a year from subs only. That's not taking into account the store, and that's only WoW.

    So what have they given us in the last seven months for our billion pounds? 2 recycled dungeons. Even if they only invested 10% per year, that's still 100 million pounds to produce content. 100 million will buy you a LOT of content. Wtf is going on indeed.
    Not sure if you heard the news, but 4.2 is about to hit with new content.
  1. Findme's Avatar
    Thanks for nothing, sidestepping all the questions.

    The best is, the devs believe feral innervate = raid utility? LoL, gg blizz.

    The devs have lost the touch with this game....
  1. Faithshield's Avatar
    bear druid’s ability to cast Innervate
    WHAT?!

    Feral innervate does 20% of their maximum mana, which is usually around 25k, so Feral innervate gives approximately 5k mana.

    Incase Blizzard forgot, you nerfed that utility a LONG time ago.
  1. shadowkras's Avatar
    3 words
    Disa
    Poin
    Ting

    Really, warriors have a reliable self heal now? This FAQ answered nothing. We already knew, from previous blue posts, their position on vengeance, so this faq added nothing.
    Why they would answer things that were written on patch notes? Taunts can miss? Interrupts can miss? Seriously, what a waste of space.

    Also, bear tanks innervating is laughable at best, did that dev read their own patchnotes?
  1. Tevious's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Findme View Post
    Thanks for nothing, sidestepping all the questions.

    The best is, the devs believe feral innervate = raid utility? LoL, gg blizz.

    The devs have lost the touch with this game....
    They could've atleast mentioned our occasionall dps increase when we go into cat, which was nice in 10 mans but doesn't do a whole lot in 25s.

    Someone mentioned that people were asking stupid questions and that people should ask smarter questions.
    I don't think the devs had a lack of questions to answer, they just chose to answer the ones they wanted and even went as far as putting in a filler question with the taunt to make it look longer.

    So I think there are a lot of good questions out there, but they decided not to answer cause they don't have a good answer.
  1. Snakebite's Avatar
    come oooooooon rogue legendary
  1. Roscoe's Avatar
    "Q: Is there any plan to add a new tank class in the future?"
    "A:We don’t see WoW as a game that can support unlimited different class types (and the different talent specs almost behave as full classes these days!"

    Don't expect anymore classes in future expansions.
  1. Cudy's Avatar
    I like that they totally ignored the 5 man / trash pulls with geared dps and initial agro bits of the vengance question.

    The design intent there would have been interesting to know.

    I'm guessing it is something like 'always bring a rouge or hunter' or 'oops'.

    Currently it seems to me that tank skill is only really a factor in the fist 5 or 10 seconds and one missed shield slam (or equiv) or getting 'lucky' and dodging a bunch (and thus not stacking veng/getting rage) can defeat even perfect tank play... but getting hit and exp isn't worth it because after about 20 seconds vengance makes threat a non issue even if all you do is spam devastate (or equiv) while you watch tv for the rest of the fight.

    Personally I'd rather they balance us to wear threat stats and drop the vengance crap.
  1. swills's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Tricksterjim View Post
    You mean the druid innervate that is gives enough mana for ONE spell or the rebirth we have to leave form for, thus taking substantial damage and placing the rebirthed player in clave position? Great comparison.
    I agree about the Innervate bit, but it's piss easy in most every fight to safely combat rez someone while tanking. Magmaw head phase, Chimaeron Feud, Dragons during phase change, Cho'Gall on tank swap, etc, etc. Druid Combat rez isn't as easy as DKs' but then the Druid's rez is also infinitely safer due to coming back with full health (= glyph).
  1. Wyattbw09's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Blacklisted View Post
    they like to penalize healers for people screwing up, like standing in fire and pulling aggro, this is where the devs are messing up, penalize the people not the healer, penalize the healers for making poor healing chocies like spamming flash heal or delaying to heal raid damage.

    Healing a DPS who is standing in the fire, pulling aggro is a poor healing choice and is the penalty to the healer. The fire or monster itself penalizes the DPSer the healer penalizes themselves when they blow their mana healing people standing in the fire.
  1. Turaz's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Cudy View Post
    I like that they totally ignored the 5 man / trash pulls with geared dps and initial agro bits of the vengance question.

    The design intent there would have been interesting to know.

    I'm guessing it is something like 'always bring a rouge or hunter' or 'oops'.

    Currently it seems to me that tank skill is only really a factor in the fist 5 or 10 seconds and one missed shield slam (or equiv) or getting 'lucky' and dodging a bunch (and thus not stacking veng/getting rage) can defeat even perfect tank play... but getting hit and exp isn't worth it because after about 20 seconds vengance makes threat a non issue even if all you do is spam devastate (or equiv) while you watch tv for the rest of the fight.

    Personally I'd rather they balance us to wear threat stats and drop the vengance crap.
    You shouldn't always be able to hold aggro for every situation, when you do that the game does not become interesting and you might as well have a robot play the game if you worry about 5 man trash that way.
  1. Therec's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by shadowkras View Post
    3 words
    Disa
    Poin
    Ting

    Really, warriors have a reliable self heal now? This FAQ answered nothing. We already knew, from previous blue posts, their position on vengeance, so this faq added nothing.
    Why they would answer things that were written on patch notes? Taunts can miss? Interrupts can miss? Seriously, what a waste of space.

    Also, bear tanks innervating is laughable at best, did that dev read their own patchnotes?
    I wonder if, now here me out, the developers are tired of these Q and As, and they're picking the stupidest questions that have the easiest answers so that they don't have to write very much. I mean why answer thought provoking questions that you may have to retract later on, when you can write 2 paragraphs on why every tanking class is not the worst one in the game atm. Better yet just take a four word answer to some of these questions, "READ THE PATCH NOTES" and string it out into a paragraph.
  1. r80354's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Methnor View Post
    My money's on legendary tank trinket tbh. It's pretty much the only consistent gear slot used by all 4 tanks that wouldn't need 3 or more different forms of the item and/or couldn't be used by DPS to great effect.
    Need a legendary tanking necklace, think Flava Flav...
  1. Wyattbw09's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Roscoe View Post
    "Q: Is there any plan to add a new tank class in the future?"
    "A:We don’t see WoW as a game that can support unlimited different class types (and the different talent specs almost behave as full classes these days!"

    Don't expect anymore classes in future expansions.
    There is simply no need for a tank,healer,DPS class. I would support creating a specific class that was dedicated to CC and whose primary role was CC but adding more of the classes we already have is silly and pointless.

    Quite frankly, as a warrior tank the last thing I want is more plate wearing DPSer running around rolling need on tanking gear I can use because they might maybe someday what to try tanking something.
  1. Mercadi's Avatar
    bear druid’s ability to cast Innervate
    I couldn't help. but lol. Very Hard. Thanks Blizz.
  1. Ninurta's Avatar
    An another disappointing ask the devs they speak like politicians, Answer the easy questions with no real answer at all.

    Its not that there were no good questions asked its the ones they pick to answer.
  1. kukuluku's Avatar
    "Overall, we don’t want tanks to have 100% guaranteed threat on a pull, so we don’t want to buff that aspect of Vengeance"
    i think a pally and dk tank can do much more burst threat than a warrior one ( don't know for druid since i haven't raided with 1 since cataclysm ) and i think that's unfair since that makes raid leaders want to have palladins start as tank so the dps can pewpew from the start.

Site Navigation