I just want to pop in here and mention that I believe the best option for a safer country when it comes to gun violence isn't going to be the product of just one route of action. Having less guns in the general public could lower gun related violence, sure, but violence will continue to exist with or without guns. Personally, I'd like to see increased funding to our law enforcement, better gun education and stronger profiling for those purchasing guns alongside an increase of frequency of programs like gun buy-backs.
The (aside from the Pope probably) most-protected man on the planet needs more protection? I'd rather people that are unable to protect themselves(kids/elderly/handicapped) get some protection.
If someone really wanted to kill the president, a "gun free zone" wouldn't do anything to stop it.
If you must insist on using a non-sanctioned sitting apparatus, please consider the tensile strength
of the materials present in the object in question in comparison to your own mass volumetric density.
In other words, stop breaking shit with your fat ass.
Hey buddy, I live in the USA and it so happens I don't either. Wanna know what a massacre is? Go look at a day in most of the middle east. Go look at the average death toll per day in India from automotive "accidents." On the scope of things, this whole topic is bullshit kept going by people who have no horse in the race other than the warm feeling between their legs from posting their thoughts on the internet. For some of us, we've actually lost friends, family, and loved ones from violence. Some of us have had people die, and did so in circumstances where by following the law they had ZERO means or chances to defense themselves.
I agree the politicians want to take our guns because they have armed guards protecting them at all times.
In my opinion this is a load of shit. The exact reason why nutjobs go and start shooting in schools is because there are no guns in schools, they get to slaughter freely.