Originally Posted by
rolo4804
I'm not saying I'd believe it or that I did believe it, but id at least give someone the benefit to prove they are who they say they are (even if its feared the claimed cop will die at night). You asked what the difference between killing Treann and Kel would have been. I personally think Treanns vote is tainted due to the RC and subsequent suicide vote. Killing Kel (who was also town) possibly wouldn't have gone down the same way. Who knows if we lynched Kel if Treann would have died at night. I didn't think he was the cop, but possibly a bomb or pgo. To me, voting Treann day one has always been a joke. While you can get some info on it later in the game, people can use that as the excuse. Even so, we didn't har to vote Kel either. Making a push on anyone would have been fine (hindsight >.>).
And Lysah, you aren't one to use that "can't believe every claim" bullshit with me. Whenever you've claimed you expect the chance to prove yourself. Like I said, I didn't trust or believe, but I was willing to see how Treann would play it out.
---------- Post added 2013-01-16 at 07:51 PM ----------
They do, it works well for both sides, or at least as the potential to. You leave out that scum get a benefit from it as well. A few games back you were a hard push on people reading rules and guides and such, especially with lurkers. You were very hard pressed to remove lurkers due to missing end game votes if kept alive because that is a benefit to scum. You were town then. Just seems convienent for you to leave out that side of the spectrum when it suits you as scum this go around.
---------- Post added 2013-01-16 at 07:53 PM ----------
I hope everyone else sees that playstyle change from Lysah.