Wrong argument. He is a hypocrite for saying that "basic human dignity" obligates that I give up luxury to help someone with cancer, not based on any personal relationship or choice, but just by virtue of our existence and the fact that I don't have cancer and this other person does, while he sits on his computer enjoying the luxury of web browsing instead of working for the good of someone else.
The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities.
Adjusted by purchasing power parity. That means they adjust for cost of living.
When comparing costs of health care, there is no adjustment for PPP. The metric usually used is cost per person (absolute).
A more appropriate metric would be % GDP spent on healthcare. But like I said before, maybe Americans are just unhealthy, increasing health care costs as well as reducing average life expectancy. Most health care isn't a cure, its just a band aid or stop gap for the ailing.
I would like to reiterate:
I haven't seen you yet list hard evidence to support your assertions either.
Especially hand wavy statements like:
The exact statement my logic assertion was criticizing.
Let me reiterate for you: "Just because single payer 'works' in other countries doesn't mean that it would work in the US. There are confounding factors such as GDP per capita and lifestyle so you can't just assert single payer is more effective than US's current healthcare system."
A nonprofit organization (US and UK),is an organization that uses surplus revenues to achieve its goals rather than distributing them as profit or dividends.
While not-for-profit organizations are permitted to generate surplus revenues, they must be retained by the organization for its self-preservation, expansion, or plans.
The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities.
Reminds me of a picture i saw.
Breaking Bad - Canada edition.
You have cancer, treatment starts in one week.
End.
Look, more anti-Obama propaganda. Who would have thought...!?
Originally Posted by kasath
You do know that until Clinton the democrats were hard pressed on oppressing african americans right? It wasn't until Clinton that they realized they'd need the african american vote to have any power and that's when they promoted black rights. Republicans weren't the people behind slavery, it was the opposite during that time. It has nothing to do with being a white nation.
The hell are you going on about? You don't know me at all, or who I am. You have nothing to stand on but a knee-jerk reaction to comment on the degree to which I help other people.
That you apparently rate the continued accumulation of luxuries as a "right" that would surpass giving aid to someone in need is what I find disgusting about your argument.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.