Originally Posted by
Constellation
Ya, but its a slightly different circumstance. Weaponising Sha is stupid, dangerous and flatout foolish. It's on par with using a disease as a weapon, a change in the wind and your own army is infected and dying from it.
I just get really tired of hearing "Alliance has done just as many bad things to the Horde as the Horde has done to them, it's all a shade of grey" and when it comes to examples, its usually Garithos called Blood Elves names and Humans locked up the Orcs after the second war (as opposed to executing them all for the events of the first and second wars). So, if I'm going to be told I have blood of innocent horde on my Alliance toons hands, I want it there. Ya, it's a shade of grey cause, in response to the slaughter at Silverwind, the Night Elves sacked Zoramgar and burned it to the ground with every last NPC there, regardless of affiliation. Then you can say both sides have done horrible things. It's looking awefully one-sided but then a cdev insults my intelligence with the ability to read this biased crap story and tells me that the faction which dropped a bomb on a school and delights in wanton destruction purely to sow pain and misery is on the same moral footing as one who wants to be left alone, have their land respected and focus on bigger problems, like a giant metal dragon of the apocalypse. People want to drag up the events of WC3 as a reason for Cataclysm; disregarding the fact that the super heated events of WC3 were reconciled to defeat Archimonde and beyond scope of examination.