Night Elves and Humans suffer far more from Cenarios Circle and Argent Crusade respectively because it's a huge part of their culture.
In my OP (which I do implore, please read!
), I did mention that indeed the Taurens are in the CC, and then I explicitly explained why I do not consider theirs nearly as damaging as the Night Elves presence. Because their form of druidism isn't fundamental to their culture, in fact in WC3 it was non-existent. It was tagged on in WoW so Horde could get a Druid race. Tauren don't lose anything, because they're exchanging something that they never really had. There's no immediate lore on Tauren druids, and their culture is far more shamanistic/ancestor worship than druidic, unlike the Night Elves which could safely be catorgorised into the female Elune division, and the male Druid division. Ergo, the Night Elves lost 50% of their identity in one fel swoop. On top of that, the Night Elves lost one of it's main leaders. Malfurion. Where as the Tauren druid leader, Hamuul, was never mentioned outside of WoW and was introduced, again, to support the concept that Tauren have druids. He was created entirely out of a plot device, whereas Malfurion has cemented lore in both druidism and night elf culture. And Blizzard butchered him for the sake of neutrality.
and the Humans suffer with the Argent Crusade because it neutralized their main class. No, let me re-phrase that. It neutralized the Alliance's factional conceptional class. The Argent Crusade would be ok and fine if the Alliance still had updated Paladin lore, and Paladins still represented the Alliance as a whole. But there is none. I found it incredibly sad when on the WoW forums, someone asked which faction had the strongest class (ergo Horde has the strongest Shamans and the Alliance has the strongest Priests), and the majority said that the Horde had the strongest Paladins simply because the Alliance has NO 'main' paladins that aren't neutral.
The Alliance lost its paladins due to neutrality in conjunction with bad writing (no, I don't begrudge the Horde getting paladins, but I do begrudge the way they wrote them in. It reeks of bad writing). So yes, I do believe neutral factions (especially CC and AG) have damaged the Alliance in much more severe ways than the Horde. The only Horde damage done by neutral factions is really Earthen Ring, and that's because it took Thrall from you. But as many people have stated, including Metzen himself, Thrall is going back to the Horde. So much for neutral.
Can the Alliance get Khadger/Tirion/Malfurion back yet please? Pretty please?
I'm not going to lie, I don't see why so many people are focusing on this one point when I myself consider it a minor point. But alrighty then. Humans were given specific lore that stated they evolved, as cultures, in different ways. Cultural reformation is represented in art. Architecture is a form of art, yet it is not represented.
All I was trying to say is I wanted to give the Human nations a form of identity outside of 'We're humans so obviously we like Stormwind, and the Light'. I mean, Gilneas started off well but then it simply died and merged with Stormwind/Darnasssus.
There was no lore for Tauren variation (in fact, quite the opposite. Considering they're, you know, nomads, it doesn't make sense they have buildings anyway). Orcs was given no lore for variation. Forsaken come from a single nation, so it wouldn't make sense if they had variation. Goblins come from one cartel, and Blood Elves come from one nation.
Humans do not. It'd be like saying back in the 13th century, England had the same building designs as France or Spain. We didn't, we had our own unique design and visiting the countries would offer a wildly different experience. I want that for the Humans, I want Blizzard to develop the humans outside of 'they're humans and they like the Light'. Give each Human nation a cultural identity and stick with it (unlike Gilneas which they so, so obviously gave up on)
And the Horde have treated them so nicely, yes? (Sylvanas blackmailing them, Garrosh because a racist douche and both of them combined have deliberately wasted precious Blood Elven troops. You know, all the reasons why the Blood Elves left the Alliance to begin with. Them being in the Horde is a lore folly, and there's no argument to counter it except Horde needed a pretty race)
I'm not going to lie, I don't overly care about Pandaren. They could join the Horde for all I care, and like I said in my OP, the only function they serve right now is further exacerbating the Alliance's problem of dull races. My main point of them is introducing yet another Neutral race, and tagging it on to both the Alliance AND the Horde was a bad idea.
Because they did it in two entirely different ways?
Malfurion going neutral didn't make sense. The Horde was literally firing arrows at his 'wife', the Horde was burning down Ashenvale forest and killing Night Elves and decimating everything he ever believed in. Yet he had forced neutrality onto him.
Thrall going neutral made a different kind of sense. The Alliance never threatened what he was doing (fixing the world, unlike the Horde that did threaten what Malfurion was trying to do).
Plus, Thrall is destined to go back to the Horde. He's quite literally been promised to return to your own faction. Which is great, I support that, I hate this whole neutral concept, but where is the Alliance's promise of neutrality removed? If anything, we have more of our own heroes lining up to take the neutral plunge.
So far, we've lost
-Khadger
-Tirion
-Malfurion
-Rhonin
in my prediction, we will lose
-Anduin
-Velen
-Jania (seriously, the moment Garrosh is dead I'll almost bet money that she'll have a sudden realization that war is bad and Dalaran will go neutral again).
You bringing up Thrall only works at your disadvantage. You've had one main hero go neutral. The Alliance has lost dozens.