I'd like to see Lor'themar Theron become the next leader, just to watch the forum belf haters have a meltdown of epic proportions.
I'd like to see Lor'themar Theron become the next leader, just to watch the forum belf haters have a meltdown of epic proportions.
A Mary Sue is a character that can do no wrong. IMO Thrall's choice of Garrosh Hellscream as the new Warchief prevents him from being classified as a Mary Sue. That was one HUGE wrong.
No sunshine (and I'm 31, how old are you junior?), you just want such a character to die to feed a morbid fascination.
---------- Post added 2013-06-12 at 04:56 PM ----------
Thrall makes mistakes, and people call him a sue. Thrall shows he can be defeated (by staghelm) and still call him a sue.
People are morons.
#boycottchina
Well here's what we know.
Garrosh will not be staying Warchief, as being the living vessel of Y'shaarj seems to disqualify you from holding political office.
Nazgrim will not be, either. Because he'll more than likely be buried with the other corpses.
FFXIV - Maduin (Dynamis DC)
I don't agree, for example, i really like Thrall but i wouldn't be mad if he die, why? because every good story need an ends, and maybe Thralls story should end cause that may help others characters stories bloom (Like Agraa story or the next Warchief story)...
---------- Post added 2013-06-12 at 10:01 AM ----------
I agree Thrall is not a Marrie Sue and i actually like that Blizzard showed how Thrall regret what he have done, how his decision to make Garrosh the Warchief made the Horde fall apart, cause that showed that Thrall can also be wrong, that he´s wise but that does not mean he can't make a bad desicion
I'm 26 and you might want to start acting your age. I don't like Thrall because I think he's a boring character and his death could open the story for more development. He is played out. Same reason why I hope Illidan stays dead. There is nothing morbid about wanting the story to keep moving forward.
You need to learn to respect other people's opinions and stop trying to paint people like the devil just because they don't like the same video game characters that you do.
I agree with you, i mean many other people story can be develop if Thralls die, like Agraa (i hate her but i want more prominent female characters), but i would like Illidan to be rezzed... why? cause that mean that the Night Elf story will be develope (they really need it) and Tyrande story will also be develope (I hate the Wife role she have right now....)
Although I do agree that the night elf lore needs a shake and that Tyrande has been sitting in the fridge for too long, I don't think Illidan is the way to go. I loved Illidan's participation in warcraft 3, but in TBC all he did was hide away in fear of the Burning legion. I much preferred what they did with Staghelm although I think Blizzard missed a wonderful chance to bring Tyrande in that fight. She should be the one opposing Staghelm, showing her strength as a woman and as a military leader.
So you would be content with having a developed character, a hero, die making the excuse 'all stories need to end', but then you'd want them to rez Illidan, whos story did end in TBC?
You don understand the horrible double standards of what your saying right.
Anyway, screw this, I've gotten into enough of these pointless debates where it ends up the same.
#boycottchina
Harry Potter made mistakes, doesn't mean he's not a Mary Sue.
And please act your age, rather than calling for people's yearn for story advancement as the need 'to feed a morbid fascination'. In A Song of Ice and Fire, important characters die a lot, not 'to feed a morbid fascination' but to advance the story. We feel emotion and attachment to these characters and killing them in front of us only strengthens our emotional attachment and makes the story that bit more unpredictable.
Killing Thrall would be nothing but good for the story. New story-lines would open as the man who saved the Horde is dead, people will be uneasy, the new leader will not get the best reception, the Alliance will feel more confident. You might think Thrall is the essential lord and saviour of Warcraft but
killing the most powerful shaman would do a lot for the story.
#boycottchina
I really. REALLY. hope that is not the case.
I hate council leadership with a burning passion. Because it doesn't actually unite anyone.
If the Forsaken really wanna drop a plague bomb on Stormwind, they'll just hold up council proceedings until the others capitulate.
FFXIV - Maduin (Dynamis DC)
i bet on the trolls!
cause blizz is trolling us
sometimes i think you associate anyone who wants the "good guy" to die as a bad stain on society just for the trolls.
i seriously do not understand how you can think that just because people want to see the evil side win that that makes them a bad person.
i wanted gerard butlers character to kill everyone in law abiding citizen, i guess that makes me a terrorist
Not to mention that 'Mary Sue' is being used incorrectly by people who don't know better. A Mary Sue is a character that is written into a story that represents the author allowing the author to write themselves into the story. The first Mary Sue was a star trek fan fiction where a character named Mary Sue behaved just like the Author so they could reflect themselves into the Star Trek mythos so they could live through their character.
Just because a bunch of stupid people apply the term Mary Sue wrong does not make it the correct way of applying the term.
I think that its a 50/50% chance that Thrall will become the Orc Faction leader but NOT the Horde leader. As a father and husband he has a lot on his plate. Then again being a father and husband typically pushes a character out to pasture and its considered a fulfilled death if you die and leave behind heirs. So 50% chance he dies.
These is why i would like Thrall to die, to give someone else that oportunity, to show his/her value, cause right now the only one that shows the chance to see the Orcs as good is with Thrall, but what if Thrall die, and that makes many other orcs follow his example and then one of those Orcs may come up to lead them... That's what i want!, i want Blizzard to show that even if Thrall dies, his legacy will still live on, that the Orcs can be good without him, and with that they could take another character story and develope it (no i don't want a new character, i want an existing one like Agraa)