Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
... LastLast
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Raugnaut View Post
    There is no source, of course. only 3 posts, TERRIBLE level distribution like has never before been seen, ect.

    Trolling trolls troll trollingly.
    No this is true. A blue poster named Caydiem posted the list of expansions back in 11/28/2004.

  2. #22
    nope, sorry. carry on.

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Doomthulsa View Post
    No this is true. A blue poster named Caydiem posted the list of expansions back in 11/28/2004.
    No the guy who faked the entire thing came out and admitted to it way back in late tBC/early WotLK which is when the list first "leaked".
    Quote Originally Posted by High Overlord Saurfang
    "I am he who watches they. I am the fist of retribution. That which does quell the recalcitrant. Dare you defy the Warchief? Dare you face my merciless judgement?"
    i7-6700 @2.8GHz | Nvidia GTX 960M | 16GB DDR4-2400MHz | 1 TB Toshiba SSD| Dell XPS 15

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Doomthulsa View Post
    No this is true. A blue poster named Caydiem posted the list of expansions back in 11/28/2004.
    False, the list was posted during Wrath-beta and the guy came out and said it was fake.
    Goodbye-Forever-MMO-Champ
    Quote Originally Posted by HighlordJohnstone View Post
    Alleria's whispers start climaxing

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Flaks View Post
    No the guy who faked the entire thing came out and admitted to it way back in late tBC/early WotLK which is when the list first "leaked".
    The list is a decent indicator of places we may see in future expansions, because they all make sense in Blizzard lore and are places Blizzard and players would be interested in seeing. However, the list itself is not a "leaked" or true indication of what the next expansion is 100% certain to be.

    It's very likely that it's going to be Legion-focused, but it's obviously not going to be 95-100 as outlined on the list, or even necessarily going to include any of the zones on the list.

    If anything, the existence of Pandaria should show that the list is not up-to-date or correct, regardless of its status as faked or actual Blizzard material.

  6. #26
    Elemental Lord Sierra85's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    getting a coffee
    Posts
    8,490
    behind every rumor is a grain of truth
    Hi

  7. #27
    Herald of the Titans ATZenith's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    2,593
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanp0405 View Post
    The next expansion is and will be about the Burning Legion. Currently, the only info I know and can give, is the list of new zones, and their level ranges.
    K'aresh - 96 to 99
    Argus Meadowlands - 97 to 100
    Mac'Aree - 99 to 100
    Maw of Oblivion - 100+
    The Burning Citadel - 100+++

    Thus, taking us finally to the awaited cap of level 100. Thanks for your time, and have a great one!
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Found this in the list aswell.

    Wolfenhold - 1 to 10
    Xorothian Plains - 10 to 20

    The Green Lands - 88 to 91
    The Dying Paradise - 91 to 94
    The Emerald Nightmare - 94 to 97
    The Eye of Ysera - 97 to 100

    Deephome - 88 to 91
    Skywall - 91 to 94
    The Abyssal Maw - 94 to 97
    The Firelands - 97 to 100

    Legion Set

    K'aresh - 96 to 99
    Argus Meadowlands - 97 to 100
    Mac'Aree - 99 to 100
    Maw of Oblivion - 100+
    The Burning Citadel - 100+++

    Originally a blue post back in '08
    "Originally a blue post back in '08"
    So yea.. What is the point of posting a blue post from 5 years ago?

  8. #28
    Herald of the Titans -Ethos-'s Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    2,728
    Wasnt this locked like 10 minutes ago?

  9. #29
    " 'Originally a blue post back in '08'
    So yea.. What is the point of posting a blue post from 5 years ago?"

    It supplies information regarding the next expansion pack, since this one blows.

  10. #30
    Herald of the Titans -Ethos-'s Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    2,728
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanp0405 View Post
    It supplies information regarding the next expansion pack, since this one blows.
    Incorrect information.

  11. #31
    Here we go again.
    Last edited by Ulgrim; 2013-07-20 at 08:24 AM.

  12. #32
    we all know it's not going to be a Legion expansion, good try

  13. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Lime View Post
    Source?

    /10char
    Would it kill you to write "What is your source?" instead of /10 characters?

  14. #34
    Yeah more than likely, Phuongvi. Have you done the Legendary quest line?

  15. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by Phuongvi View Post
    we all know it's not going to be a Legion expansion, good try
    Agreed, it's going to be World of Warcraft: Unicorns Are Whimsical.

  16. #36
    Mechagnome DaveL's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Galaxy MV4478-87, Vontos cluster, Alpha Prime
    Posts
    654
    @ OP


    nope, you didn´t. Try again please.

  17. #37
    The last guy who posted one of these ate a ban, you know.

  18. #38
    "The last guy who posted one of these ate a ban, you know."
    I'm sure that one was a troll, this one is legit. I have sources, as posted above. Believe me or not, this is true info, not the most accurate but it is somewhere close to the next expansion zones.

  19. #39
    Data Monster Simca's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    FL, United States
    Posts
    10,410
    This is suuuuper old, guys.

    http://wow.allakhazam.com/forum.html...6&h=50&p=3#145

    The author admitted to faking the list after Cataclysm proved him wrong. Another guy photoshopped the fake blue post.

    There's some pretty hilarious denial in the thread actually as a couple people tried desperately to search the internet for an earlier source - there isn't one. His post in that thread is the first time this list was ever posted on the internet - in 2007.
    Global Moderator | Forum Guidelines

  20. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanp0405 View Post
    this one is legit. I have sources, as posted above. Believe me or not, this is true info
    No it isn't, no you don't, no it isn't.

    Better still, reasserting false information will only get you moderated faster.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •