0%
0-10%
10-20%
20-30%
30-40%
40-50%
50-60%
60-70%
70-80%
80-90%
90-100%
Except we're talking about a small device that transforms to a larger device. A monk carrying thousands of barrels is carrying thousands of barrels of beer.
Where does it say that Tinkers aren't using advanced technology? Clearly they do. Considering that a couple of their capabilities mirror Titan-tech, and none of the Tinkers abilities exist in the profession, i dont see why we cant say that they build things no one else can.Said 'highly advanced piece of technology' doesn't exist anywhere in the world of Azeroth, not even mentions. No precedent. 'But tinkers can build advanced technology no one else can't'. No! That is BS reasoning, and you know it.
Nice dodge.Hannah Barbera =/= Blizzard.
Actually, your device is as big as a factory.
The only place it says tinkers are using 'highly advanced technology no one else can use' is in your mind. That stuff is literally pulled right out of your backside.Where does it say that Tinkers aren't using advanced technology? Clearly they do. Considering that a couple of their capabilities mirror Titan-tech, and none of the Tinkers abilities exist in the profession, i dont see why we cant say that they build things no one else can.
Not dodge. Fact. For that same reason I could point out such things as 'pocket factories' don't exist in shows like 'House' or movies like 'Inception'. You're trying to use outside sources that has nothing to do with the world setting the game is based on to prove viability.Nice dodge.
If you're saying that gravity bomb is part of engineering, then find it in engineering.
It shouldn't be that hard.
- - - Updated - - -
After it comes out of the much smaller device.
Then where is the Tinker technology within the Engineering profession?The only place it says tinkers are using 'highly advanced technology no one else can use' is in your mind. That stuff is literally pulled right out of your backside.
Then town in a box should work out better for you. It's more than likely the same tech as pocket factory, and it exists in the game world.Not dodge. Fact. For that same reason I could point out such things as 'pocket factories' don't exist in shows like 'House' or movies like 'Inception'. You're trying to use outside sources that has nothing to do with the world setting the game is based on to prove viability.
Last edited by Teriz; 2014-03-20 at 11:07 PM.
You still don't get it, do you? Even if it did come out of a 'much smaller device', how would this factory fit during a combat situation? Scale, my friend. Scale.
I'm sorry, we all tried, but you glued, nailed and riveted the wool too tightly over your eyes, by now.Then where is the Tinker technology within the Engineering profession?
See answer #1.Then town in a box should work out better for you. It's more than likely the same tech as pocket factory, and it exists in the game world.
The only reason the factory comes up as being a factory for making robots is Teriz trying to show that none of the tinker's WC3 abilities are taken and that they needto be in the game, and that they are on the same level of fantasy as other WoW abilities.
Some small robot teleporter, or robots being created from leftover junk parts from the tinker's other creations are pretty cool and very workable ideas, being both smaller scale and less absurd. The class ends up being a lot more manageable with small changes like that, but it ruins Teriz's heartheld belief that tinkers need to be the next class added, this time for sure. A conversation about how to make tinkers cool, interesting, and suited to the setting would be entirely different from this one of ensuring that tinkers are next up or more likely than some other class.
I don't think he gets his hypocrisy.
If you're going to say that a tech-based weapon that does AoE damage (I.E. the Landshark) does not serve the same function as a tech-based ability that does AoE damage (I.E. Cluster Rocket) because one is an item and one is an ability; that's fine. But when you deny the fact that, ultimately, they do the same thing with the same means, and then turn around and say that Locust Swarm and Unholy Blight are 'basically' the same because they both have insects that attack AoE... It kinda makes you seem flippy-floppy.
Except the argument wasn't about "serving the same function". The argument was that the G91 Lamdshark is the SAME as Cluster Rocket, or that the G91 Landshark represents Cluster Rocket in WoW.
We already have an ability called Cluster Rocket in WoW that is very similar to the WC3 ability anyway. Why would you still believe that the G91 landshark is remotely similar to Cluster Rocket at that point?
As for Locust Swarm, the Druid's Insect Swarm was closer to it than Unholy Blight. Either ability is clearly Locust Swarm's representative in WoW
Last edited by Teriz; 2014-03-20 at 11:37 PM.