Warcraft II death knights vs Warcraft III death knights

[Snes]

Personally, I like the original ones from WC II, they were bad ass. It's a shame we don't get the mobile cyclone move and can't cast haste on other players though. Then again alot of stuff was cooler in WC II. Like the horde had trolls that weren't hunched over and horribly underfed. Good old days.

[Ave07]

To bad Blizzard had to add gnomes in WoW and there were non in WC3 and in WC2 they only had the submarine.

[mechleader]

Want to play chop chop chop again

[Kannable]

WC II Death Knights had horrible graphics. WC III Death Knights are where it's at.

[kailtas]

Wc2 death knights seemed less dead....

[Deleted]

Wc2 death knights seemed less dead....

No, WCII Death Knights were the SPIRITS of DEAD Orc Warlocks and Necrolytes placed in the bodies of of DEAD Human Knights, and WCIII were blue-eyed yellow bellied plate wearin' nannies complainin' about their aching decay.
my point is placed.

- - - Updated - - -

WC II Death Knights had horrible graphics. WC III Death Knights are where it's at.

It's not about the Graphics, it's about style and how badass they are.

[Deleted]

No, WCII Death Knights were the SPIRITS of DEAD Orc Warlocks and Necrolytes placed in the bodies of of DEAD Human Knights, and WCIII were blue-eyed yellow bellied plate wearin' nannies complainin' about their aching decay.
my point is placed.

- - - Updated - - -



It's not about the Graphics, it's about style and how badass they are.

WC2 Dks would literally fall apart at the sight of Paladins in WC2.

Its no surprise when the original DKs became Liches Ner'Zhul created a new breed who didn't fall apart at the sight of an Exorcism.

[Darsithis]

It wasn't necessary to necro such a very old thread to point out something already discussed multiple times in other threads over the past 6 years.

Closing.