The left wing always loses because the right wing always has the most industrial engineers. 97% of scientists are leftwingers, 97% of engineers are right wingers. I guess it could be that right wing people are more disciplined.
Last edited by Hooked; 2016-03-21 at 06:24 AM.
Be it Right or Left wing, the biggest problem in today's political views is that politicians don't really care about the well being of the country. They are in it for themselves and to make their friends rich.
If there wasn't so much greedy self-centered assholes making decisions both right and left wing views would actually work.
If big companies don't all keep money for their ceo and out of shore banks the gouv would make money out of those. And employees would get decent salaries that they would spend in the country thus creating a healthy economy.
But noooooo... Bosses just get bigger and bigger salaries and they relocate in other countries. So we don't get any benifit from this. They get cheap labor and tax heaven countries. Gouv get's nothing, employees aren't even in our country.
left wing losses, because people like you dont understand how taxing works at all.
taxes are %tages, and therefore, a stepwise tax increase towards the bigger income people (i mean those with really buig incomes) is always beneficial for the poor workers, because:
while low paid will see an increase of taxes about 100dollar/year, big incomers will ahve an increase like 100ooo dollar/year, while those that have low paid jobs will get more help from the state, while the big income people dont qualify because they still have enough left even if they were taxed like 70% of their income.
the poor thing is, that the conservative always manages to fool the idiot poor workers with deranging the leftwing tax policy the way you did, and, convinces them, that "they just have to work harder and for less money to get finally wealthy" and the shitheads really belive it and go vote for the conservatives, whos sole purpose is to conserve the state as it is: people working poor and them getting rich by paying less and less loan.
i didnt see any buisinessman that payed more loans (besides for himself and his staff maybe) when they ended up with more profit than the year before.
its a lie, constantly told, that never once happened.
So much incorrect info in this op. More tax on the ultra rich, more money to spend on infrastructure, schools, hospitals, social security. The working class labor is not increasingly taxed in a left wing society. Do you understand that the richer the poor gets, the more the country gains? Meanwhile, the rich has been shown in studies to mostly sit on their wealth, not spending it, thus the money is kind of worthless for a society. It needs to be spent to be worth something.
Also, in a really left-wing society, the workers own the means of production. Which basically means they get all the money from what they produce, not the factory owner, because there is none. So please keep on telling me how the working class "hate" a left society, you obviously got no clue.
Last edited by Krille; 2016-03-21 at 08:45 AM.
Strictly speaking neither the left nor the right wing actually "wins" in the long run, it's more that the definitions of left and right shift over time to maintain a rough parity in terms of power and influence, which helps to ensure a healthy democracy.
This is basically what religion is today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon. A way to keep the people in check, some holy God is watching you, better behave.
Yeah, this is the problem, it isn't the private sector that creates wealth, it's the middle-class. Consumer spending is what drives the economy, and when consumers don't have any money to spend because they work two jobs and can barely afford to pay their bills, the economy slows down.
women on the right are usually better looking on average than women on the left. Class and manners mean a lot. Women on the left are in most cases easier though, so I guess they have the advantage in politics when swaying the younger crowd.
Last edited by Hooked; 2016-03-21 at 08:53 AM.
Yeah now you are just making shit up. Have you seen Swedish women? Sweden is probably one of the most liberal countries in the world and they have some of the hottest women in the world. I even just looked up your "top 20 hottest conservative women" and they listed the horse faced Ann Coulter on their list.
- - - Updated - - -
And you would be wrong. Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is extreme right wing. Which is what Donald Trump is treading into. Just because you are trying to make up your own definitions, doesn't mean you can make up your own facts.
He was what we'd call in German "völkisch", which can be loosely translated to "people-oriented", it's an ideological movement which incorporates romantisation of folk and imagined ethnic values summarizing it as racially charged ethnocentrism. It's imperialism by people rather than by nation. It transcends the idea of a nation and declares that not national borders defines the lands of a people but the where the people are situationally but also feel spiritually rooted.
Yes, that movement was already seen as heavily right-wing during the Weimar Republic where it flourished. The reason why it existed was because, believe it or not, Germany had Jewish nationalists and the Völkisch ideology wanted to separate from that. When you drift more to the right than the already existing definition of far right then it doesn't change you into left or just more right, it makes you a rightwing extremist.
It also needs to be noted that in the 20s there was no strict differentiation into left and right going by social values the same way we are doing today. In fact, communists and Nazis in pre-3rd Reich Germany did not differ a lot going by basic social agendas, they were both rooted in the issues of that time. They differed in what it should be rooted: communism as defined by Marx and Engels and as practised by Leninist and later Stalinist Sovietunion or by merging ideals of ultra-traditionalism and grassroots socialism of Völkisch ideologists such as Johann Gottlieb Fichte. This is due to the fact that today we have a very much refined and bigger set of values assigned to the left and right spectrum. Stalinism and Nationalsocialism had many similarities even going as far that both wanted to create a new human being, the Stalinist worker was many among equals even within the nucleus of a family, the Nationalsocialist worker was supposed to be a supreme being of his race with the male at the top of every chain.
Last edited by Ravenblade; 2016-03-21 at 10:30 AM.
WoW: Crowcloak (Druid) & Neesheya (Paladin) @ Sylvanas EU (/ˈkaZHo͞oəl/) | GW2: Siqqa (Asura Engineer) @ Piken Square EU
If builders built houses the way programmers built programs,the first woodpecker to come along would destroy civilization. - Weinberg's 2nd law
He seeks them here, he seeks them there, he seeks those lupins everywhere!
You can try to spin it all you want, but the fact still remains that the Nazis were a far right wing party. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism
- - - Updated - - -
Pretty much everything he has said in this thread isn't true. Are you going to say he is right? Because that would make you wrong as well. Not entirely surprising with your posting history though.