Blizzard has all the right to do that because it's their property, no one should complain.
This guy stole my car, but he wasn't making money from it, so it was totally cool.
how ignorant (or maybe whiteknightish) ppl can be ? i would say when he actually PLAYS vanilla on a private server, and while YOU not being HIM, he reaaaaaally knows better than you, what he likes and how good he thinks vanilla is.
are we really at a point where ppl are telling others "no no no, your oppinion and feelings are not the RIGHT ones. i know that better than you, what you like and think."
cheeeeeeeseus
Last edited by Niwes; 2016-04-07 at 04:22 AM.
Check me out....Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing, Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing.
My Gaming PC: MSI Trident 3 - i7-10700F - RTX 4060 8GB - 32GB DDR4 - 1TB M.2SSD
So what I got out of this was....
It was becoming an embarrassment for Blizzard. Got too large, new players might think it was legitimate, It had a huge RMT presence, it was shifting a lot of attention away from retail WoW
I think you would be surprised how many were playing and still had an active WoW account. I don't think paying would drop the numbers that much, probably 20% if I had to take a guess. I don't think I can remember anyone saying they were playing because it was free, in fact most said they would be willing to pay for it. It being free was just a bonus.
You would be right I think. Especially now with boosts and no need to level from one if you are a new player and purchase an expansion. Viewed from one perspective, expansions are very close to standalone games. They build on what's come before but there's no required need to work through EK/Kalimdor/Northrend etc. to play the game now.
"...money's most powerful ability is to allow bad people to continue doing bad things at the expense of those who don't have it."
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say:
This guy replicated my car exactly, and is using it. But not only is he using a replication, this replication was hand made by me and it's my own creation.
Or something like that, because that exact analogy also doesn't work for pirating.
I don't think Timeless Isle failed. Not really, but imagine a more dynamic Timeless with at each instance. It's would be no different than TBC dailies compacted with Timeless, and Firelands/Isle of QuelDanas dailies hub. But force the group on the ground at the hub, and they might stick together to do the dailies. It would also allow PvP between each faction to occur at each hub.
Players will complain, but the onus is on Blizzard to give in. The history is to thick of rolling over, but if we had this shit from the start, it wouldn't be this way.
There's a noisy demand for it. How big that demand is and whether or not it would happen if people had to pay for it is another question. I'm sorry but it just is. The two things: noisy and big are not the same thing. On the scale that Blizzard operates at 100K is nothing.
"...money's most powerful ability is to allow bad people to continue doing bad things at the expense of those who don't have it."