And there is lies the question. These past few days have been quite intriguing, and might havepossibly, and I say that quite cautiously, catalyzed an internal discussion about legacy realms at Blizzard. Discussing the cost/long term impact would be the next step, but this is all theory. They might just be shrugging all of this off without a care.
Why do people defend the "depth" of vanilla so much? On Nostalrius, you was basically obliged to design your character by forum stickies. You had to have certain build and BiS gear. There was no variability. Playing vanilla after 10 years is a min-maxing chore. There's nothing fun about it.
This is certainly not hush hush in the way Imeant, none of the other server kills I have seen have had anywhere near this much attention in only a few days, for the most part the players keep to themselves, this time this topic has been allowed up and there are topics on the cesspit known as the general forums, a topic in the EU forums was even "supported" by Blizzard (They let the topic stay up so long as people stuck to that, like here). Blizzard never comments on anything, which is a shame.
Infractions: 2
Not in this case.
Why is preserving what these pirates have of any value to Blizzard? Blizzard gains nothing by that, so why should they let that influence their decision? No, this is an illegitimate competitor that can be killed by legal action. Headshot!There is something worth preserving here. They know it. You want something different. You don't need to live in our world, or see it as a threat.
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"
Oh really?
https://www.change.org/p/michael-mor...ty/c/429347378
Poor guy, his parents must have really hated Blizz, being stuck with this name and all...
But it's cute you think names and people are real there, made me smile.
Hahahaha, hold on. You're now saying not only are you entitled for Blizzard to refute YOUR claims, but in the 11+ years of WoW, there's NEVER been data to take from pirate servers before Nostralius.
Your delusions know no bounds, bravo /golfclap.
They don't "need" it. I'm positive they've done the number crunching of what would the estimate be of people who would pay, and, once again, they figured out it would cover the cost/time to develop the server, let alone maintain it.I suppose Blizz will need some evidence proving that many people would be willing to pay for a vanilla legacy server.
Your passion don't pay the bills.Fine. Ignore the fact that we are discussing an 11 year old game with so much passion that it has drawn the attention of hundreds of thousands of people.
...No, it's evidence of how many viewed the thread. There's no qualification someone needs to click on the thread.It's evidence of popularity, but not necessarily proof.
Because you people have literally nothing better to do than to retread old ground. And by people, I mean a myriad of other names that are more fitting.You yourself despise the mere suggestion of legacy servers. I wonder why.
Except it's not popularity - it's a vocal minority crying nostalgia, remembering all the "good" parts and leaving out just how many poor gameplay designs there were, and QoL changes. Bloating the action bar with the same spell but different ranks? Oh yeah, I miss that.Yes, the popularity of past versions of WoW proves that the current version of WoW is lacking something.
Stop using "many". There's no number to "many". Your presumed number of 150k has no qualification of "active".That's not good PR. I have no doubt that Blizzard will improve their current model in Legion, but there is no need for vanilla WoW to fade into obscurity when so many people still love the game.
THEY'VE HEARD YOU. You've been heard, when the same dopey faced mope at Blizz con walks up to the mic during Q&A, the multitude of threads on both official and unofficial forums. They've acknowledged you a multitude of times, and yet you're still here with your fingers in your ears and stomping your foot.This is where you are wrong. They will listen. Whether they agree to pursue a certain course of action or not is another story.
Yes and those too are in an (il)legal grey area. Will they take action against all the sites? No, but does that change what they are? Not at all.Old games are preserved. You can emulate games from the 8 bit or 16 bit era, for example.
They're also cheap and refuse to pay 5$ or whatever on the Nintendo Store online.People still play SNES and Genesis games. Do you know why? Because some games are timeless (some art never ages), like some sports never get old.
Nah. I was content before, during this post, and after I post it. I've literally lost nothing (except maybe time) by interacting with a person like you. And by person, I mean a multitude of other names I could think of.This all seems to be lost on you. How tragic.
No. I meant what I said, because I'm not a lonely melodramatic pseudo-intellectual.you move on, you mean. You need to find new prey.
They aren't subs - they didn't pay for anything.150k subs on a private server hosting an 11 year old game. That proves there is still a demand for that product.
This is so cringy..Remember what I said: the giants of old all shared the same fate. You are completely blind to what many people deeply desire. You call that refusing to grow up.
...No, you weren't. You wanted to make a stance. On what, I have NO idea, but seeing as how you avoid answering the question directly, I can only assume that you're so emotionally charged that you so read what I said in a laughable way. Pardon me.I am not being rebellious. I am merely making a suggestion based on evidence.
CHORTLE CHORTLE CHORTLE
"I moved on, I just want to control of the thing I've moved on from."I moved on a long time ago. I just want a game that changed lives to be preserved.
I know you'll never admit to how sad this is... but it's sad.
What I want to know is when did England invade Sweden and establish "Blizzardsuckscockville"?
Last edited by Monstercloud; 2016-04-08 at 09:55 PM.
Dear lord, 300 odd pages about a server running bloody Vanilla WoW.