But is it actual quality? Americans pay a shit ton for health care, and the quality is often questionable. We also have a greta many obstacles that limit the competition.
And yes, when it comes to cars, quality also matters.
- - - Updated - - -
It was not a joke at all. You think that by having the freedom to do one thing, you cannot also choose to do the other. If you don't like one form, you can always opt for the other.
You keep saying freedom as if you actually know what you are talking about.
Yes you are right, thats why cars are also a heavily regulated industry. However competition does not work in medicine in the same sense as the auto industry.
Ever wonder why the quality is questionable? Ever wonder why medical quality is better in other countries?
People want something for free? How is this post worthy?
No that is not what you said. You stated that the healthy have to assume a burden they would not otherwise have to assume and as such it restricts freedom. They assume that burden under ANY type of healthcare system. So what you were saying is that healthcare systems restrict freedom. Don't go trying to pretend you did not say that when you did.
I'm pretty sure I have a good grasp on what freedom is.
Cars are not so heavily regulated as to limit the competition within the marketplace. The competition is what pushes the quality up. And I think it's pretty damn clear that the quality of automobiles has gone way up in the past 40 years.
Some countries do have better quality medical care, others do not. In America, the quality is low because there's very little competition. There's also a ridiculous amount of regulations that do nothing but slow down the processes. Drugs in other countries get approved much faster than in the United States. We also have laws stating you cannot purchase drugs overseas, which means we have to pay the price they demand.
When a healthy person voluntarily purchases health insurance, they do so even though they are likley to lose money in the long run. However, they have made that choice voiluntarily. The exact same thing can be said for single payer, but it's not voluntary. One is a restirction of freedom, the other is an example of someone exercising it.
Automobiles have plenty of regulations, from safety standards, to assurance they wont explode, to factory regulations. I have a feeling you tried to buy drugs from Somalia. The model for medicine people ask for in the US is to mimic successful models in Europe and Canada.
But it's not a freedom at all, because in America you NEED to pay anyway. You NEED to pay to visit the doctor, you NEED to pay for perscriptions. You're basically arguing that a fake choice is better than understand the world.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah, let's take my medical bills, divide it by the entire fucking population of the British Isles, and I guess we'll see how much I owe them. Oh wait, they have those options too, and I am fine with paying them for it.
So we're equal and happy.
They are successful models, but they are also restrictions of freedom. Like I said many pages ago, Americans tend to have a problem with people taking away their freedoms.
I think single payer is a valid system, but it does involve the restrition of people's freedoms, so I do not support it. I think voluntary single payer sounds like an excellent idea.
- - - Updated - - -
But the ACA is also a restriction of freedom. If you held a gun to my head, and told me to pick between the abortion that is the ACA, and single payer, I would pick single payer in a heartbeat. Of course, I would much rather you not hold a gun to my head.