The pro-pirate argument is just as weak today as it was when Napster got shut down.
The pro-pirate argument is just as weak today as it was when Napster got shut down.
It's amusing you think you're making an argument there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"
Just wait until 3D printers are the size of a room and you can print anything you could ever imagine, how will they stop piracy then? Oh they won't be able to. We are in the land of grey areas and have been since the beginning of high speed internet with digital goods and it will never change.
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"
No, it has no bearing on the legitimacy of the argument. The argument that pservers are illegal and improper, like any logical argument, is independent of the moral status of the person making the argument. To think otherwise is to endorse ad hominem as a valid logical principle.
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"
If you knowingly and willingly allow a criminal to stay in your house (because he's part of your family or an old friend, for example), you are still charged with at least being compliant with the crimes they commit.
The hosting company knew what was going on with the servers they rented. They willingly profited from stolen copyrighted and trademarked material.
Woah this thread is still active. Why can't y'all just move along. Jeez!
10700K, 32GB 3200Mhz, RTX 3080 Ti
Irrelevant really, should any one of the companies I've stolen from want to come after me I don't get to pay the humanitarian card like these pricks are doing. "I just love your game/movie/music soooo much!"
Fuck you caught me what do I owe ya.
Plus I don't share I leech. Sharing/hosting is a sure fire way to find yourself on the wrong end of the stick. I also like to kick it back to the company/artist with a purchase if I like the content enough.
You gotta stream these days anyway. Some companies like HBO will actively pursue pirates. Porn companies just try and blackmail you.
I find it really hard to believe this line, considering we have no evidence of that except the word from the criminals themselves, which is, honestly, worthless, since no criminal ever admits to the crime while he or she can plausibly deny it. And some never admit to it, even when proven wrong.
The hosting company that was renting a server for the Nostalrius gang was not a charity. It's a legitimate business, and as such, sells their services to gain a profit. They were profiting from the illegal server, and there is just no way they didn't know they were hosting an illegal copy of WoW.
So, has anyone else reported that new private server website/client/name to hacks@blizzard.com yet? It's pretty easy to find in the subreddits that all the pro-legacy server people are decrying Blizzard (and any anti-legacy server people) in. I won't link them here, but you can find them if you google.
They're already starting to advertise them.