[QUOTE=shimerra;39975002]Why speak at all then? If he has to lose/lose on the subject. He should have kept quiet, agreed? Right, but he didn't. Denial of speaking in omission, don't act like it doesn't exist.What does he have to gain? You're yet to prove that either. Actually your own later comments speak as to what he could lose which goes to the absolute sloppyness of your argument "which mean he is contractually obligated not to speak of the matter" but you falsely and incorrectly go on to assume that it's because it's something bad. Because you know Blizzard probably doesn't want him speaking out about project X after he left without their permission. He's not going to stick his foot in his mouth and make a big stink because unlike Mark Kern he's still a valuable commodity in the gaming industry.
Would you feel bad for the guy that murder someone you love, because that would be the argument. If you want to use that analogy. Try again.I feel bad for the guy who in a moment of passion murdered someone his wife was cheating on him with. Doesn't mean I think it was right, condone it, or otherwise I agree with what he did. You can have sympathy for someone while at the same time not agreeing with or condoning what they did. Just like he can feel bad for Nost players wanting to play old Vanilla again but at the same time think what they were doing by using blizzard's work wrongly.
Whatever you want to say is correct, gotcha.Wait wait wait here you are talking about what he said now you gobble up your bull shit "i'm going to read things into statements that clearly aren't there," but when he says something you don't like he's lieing? Nothing he's said has taken a position one way or the other. Stop pretending you have something when you don't.
Yadda yadda yadda, nothing to say and will just say random shit in an aggressive manner to try and act like I am right.Yet again, you're conspiratorially reading into things that aren't there that funny enough conform 100% perfectly into your world view. Him disagreeing with Blizzard's communication means his disagrees with how blizzard communicates, he could still very easily be extremely opposed to legacy servers and what Nost did or indifferent to them just as much as he could support them.
Yet, if you read what he says, he wants to be speak more on the matter but cannot. If didn't want to advocate anything he would be silent or condemn the issue. But he doesn't. That speaks more clearly to me. Again, it's not what you say sometimes, but what you don't say. Denial is an ugly thing.Already talked about this one. This is wild speculation and nothing more.
It's absolutely the same thing. The mental gymnastics you do to deny it is incredible.They do not say the same thing and honestly the mental gymnastics you have to take to contort that thought into anything coherent are impressive if they were just so depressingly wrong.
You are one of those people without self awareness aren't you?"Aka he didn't actually say it so I read inbetween the lines and hey oh look an entire novel where he says exactly what I wanted him to say,". Funny how that worked out.