1. #3361
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by infinitemeridian View Post

    You guys think that just because he is losing, it's "the establishment". .
    He's losing because the establishment gave Hilary more favourable coverage through its control of the media and advertising their donations paid for.

    Had the candidates been given equal air time it would have been a landslide for Bernie.

  2. #3362
    Quote Originally Posted by advanta View Post
    He's losing because the establishment gave Hilary more favourable coverage through its control of the media and advertising their donations paid for.

    Had the candidates been given equal air time it would have been a landslide for Bernie.
    This is such a cop out (and untrue) reason. Sanders has had plenty of coverage. A lot of it has been positive. A lot has not. Same for Hillary. Is the same establishment that is promoting Hillary also promoting Trump?

    Establishment is just "people I don't agree with".

  3. #3363
    Quote Originally Posted by advanta View Post
    She's not an evil criminal, she's just in the pay of the banks and other corporations as is a matter of public record.

    Either you want democracy, or you want the corporations to continue to have more influence over government than the people do.
    No middle ground eh? Like maybe Joe down the street doesn't know enough about banking regulations to dictate policy? The biggest issue with the Sanders campaign is this idea that the ONLY people that should be involved in politics are the average voter and the politician. The world is an extremely complex place and the average voter doesn't know shit about 99% of it. Like it or not, lobbying is a necessary evil because politicians need information about the issues and industries they are passing laws on. This "purer" form of democracy that Sanders and TYT are calling for is just letting idiots run the asylum.

    The reason why populism candidates like Sanders usually fail is because people on the whole have enough sense to realize they want someone more intelligent than themselves running the country. The challenge is finding a candidate with the good sense to look out for the voters, the wisdom to know they don't have all the answers and the intelligence to listen to the information provided by those in the industry, process it and make a decision that is in the best interests of everyone.
    Last edited by Matchles; 2016-04-28 at 06:15 PM.

  4. #3364
    Quote Originally Posted by infinitemeridian View Post
    This is such a cop out (and untrue) reason. Sanders has had plenty of coverage. A lot of it has been positive. A lot has not. Same for Hillary. Is the same establishment that is promoting Hillary also promoting Trump?

    Establishment is just "people I don't agree with".
    They have measured the level of coverage each candidate has and that is measurably untrue.
    Since we can't call out Trolls and Bad Faith posters and the Ignore function doesn't actually ignore it. Add
    "mmo-champion.com##li.postbitignored"
    to your ublock or adblock filter to actually ignore ignored posters. Now just need a way to ignore responses to them as well.

  5. #3365
    Quote Originally Posted by Matchles View Post
    No middle ground eh? Like maybe Joe down the street doesn't know enough about banking regulations to dictate policy? The biggest issue with the Sanders campaign is this idea that the ONLY people that should be involved in politics are the average voter and the politician. The world is an extremely complex place and the average voter doesn't know shit about 99% of it. Like it or not, lobbying is a necessary evil because politicians need information about the issues and industries they are passing laws on.
    The practical difference between this and legalized bribery?

    I'll wait for it.

    I'm glad you're so enlightened about politics and how things work though.

  6. #3366
    Quote Originally Posted by Fugus View Post
    They have measured the level of coverage each candidate has and that is measurably untrue.
    They sure have.

    "Media Analysis: Hillary Clinton Received Most Negative Stories, Least Positive Stories Of All Presidential Candidates"

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Daerio View Post
    The practical difference between this and legalized bribery?

    I'll wait for it.

    I'm glad you're so enlightened about politics and how things work though.
    I hope you'll take your argument to the next (il)logical step, and educate us all how advertising is practically legalized bribery.
    Help control the population. Have your blood elf spayed or neutered.

  7. #3367
    He's losing because of his policies, not his "air time."
    He puts on a good show at debates. But once his plans are released in full he loses people. I wanted nothing to do with him after his tax plan was announced and I'd be paying an extra $1000 a month in taxes. No thank you, I'm buying a house.

  8. #3368
    Quote Originally Posted by BrerBear View Post
    I hope you'll take your argument to the next (il)logical step, and educate us all how advertising is practically legalized bribery.
    Advertising where they send you on an all-expense paid vacation.

    AKA to any sensible person without their head up their ass, bribery.

  9. #3369
    How are people saying Bernie doesn't get media coverage, from what it seems he is the most positively covered among-st social media outlets. the fact that most of the social media Bernie pages are probably run by highschoolers is another question

  10. #3370
    Quote Originally Posted by Daerio View Post
    The practical difference between this and legalized bribery?

    I'll wait for it.

    I'm glad you're so enlightened about politics and how things work though.
    It is the difference between paying for votes and paying for access. It is an interesting relationship. Lobbyists who give bad or misleading information are strongly disliked among the politicians. If they pitch a bill that and say it will benefit a politician's constituents because it does X and it turns out to be wrong, then that lobbyist is going to be getting the cold shoulder the next time they come pitching a bill. Likewise, an industry may rate politicians based on their legislative priorities and then when the politician comes asking for donations they say, "well I needed you on these 5 issues and you weren't with me, best of luck in your reelection."

    Politicians are still beholden to their constituents above all else. Any donations from industries just give them more ad time to make a pitch.

  11. #3371
    Great, now take the extra step and compare the level of coverage each of them has received.

    Hint, Clinton received much more coverage than Sanders.
    Since we can't call out Trolls and Bad Faith posters and the Ignore function doesn't actually ignore it. Add
    "mmo-champion.com##li.postbitignored"
    to your ublock or adblock filter to actually ignore ignored posters. Now just need a way to ignore responses to them as well.

  12. #3372
    So, to all the people saying Hillary needs the Sanders' supporters to win, how was Sanders going to win? Get the votes of everyone who's been tagged a shill for Shillary? Maybe some of those "democratic whores" and "corporate stooges" will donate or endorse this enlightened campaign.

    The theme for this election season is division.

  13. #3373
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Dextroden View Post
    So, to all the people saying Hillary needs the Sanders' supporters to win, how was Sanders going to win? Get the votes of everyone who's been tagged a shill for Shillary?
    See... That's the disconnect here. Hillary supporters take it personally when Hillary is called a shill. Nobody is calling Hillary's supporters shills. They're just supporting a shill.

    But yeah, Hillary supporters would've chosen whether they'd want to stay at home and not vote, or vote for the GOP candidate, or vote for Sanders. Just like what Sanders supporters will most likely have to choose. Unfortunately for Hillary she's making staying at home and not voting a very enticing proposition.

  14. #3374
    They should close this thread since Bernie's campaign is over.

  15. #3375
    Quote Originally Posted by Dextroden View Post
    So, to all the people saying Hillary needs the Sanders' supporters to win, how was Sanders going to win? Get the votes of everyone who's been tagged a shill for Shillary? Maybe some of those "democratic whores" and "corporate stooges" will donate or endorse this enlightened campaign.

    The theme for this election season is division.
    Theme of the last 8 years of Presidency as well.

  16. #3376
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Tijuana View Post
    They should close this thread since Bernie's campaign is over.
    Except, of course, it isn't.

  17. #3377
    Quote Originally Posted by Sydänyö View Post
    Except, of course, it isn't.
    He has been mathematically eliminated for weeks now...

  18. #3378
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Tijuana View Post
    He has been mathematically eliminated for weeks now...
    Nope. His chances of winning have gotten smaller, but mathematically he isn't out yet. Also, he will continue all the way to the convention regardless of the results of the upcoming primaries, so yeah, no, his campaign won't be over until July.

  19. #3379
    Quote Originally Posted by Sydänyö View Post
    Nope. His chances of winning have gotten smaller, but mathematically he isn't out yet. Also, he will continue all the way to the convention regardless of the results of the upcoming primaries, so yeah, no, his campaign won't be over until July.
    It was over the minute he openly admitted he is a Socialist. Sure, you can get the Democrat nomination admitting that but, it won't fly in the general election. All it would take is one person to point out what it actually means, and he would be finished. Ignorance of what it actually means is why he gets away with it with Bernie Bros.

  20. #3380
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Tijuana View Post
    It was over the minute he openly admitted he is a Socialist. Sure, you can get the Democrat nomination admitting that but, it won't fly in the general election. All it would take is one person to point out what it actually means, and he would be finished. Ignorance of what it actually means is why he gets away with it with Bernie Bros.
    So many words and yet so little substance. Also, feel free to tell me, someone who has lived in a democratic socialist country for 37 years, what democratic socialism is. Please.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •