Well sounds to me like she hit him first and he retaliated. Nothing to see here, shes not dead. Just another domestic dispute. If shes got any brains she would leave his drunk ass. If she decides to stay then shes an idiot cuz it will happen again.
Well sounds to me like she hit him first and he retaliated. Nothing to see here, shes not dead. Just another domestic dispute. If shes got any brains she would leave his drunk ass. If she decides to stay then shes an idiot cuz it will happen again.
We're not talking about that, though. And you know that. You're trying to equate this to stupid shit like someone saying a woman is pretty being "abuse." That isn't what we're talking about here at all, and it's shitty if you to try to derail and distract by trying to pretend it is.
We're talking about someone putting his hands on their partner, and using those hands to hit said partner, even when the partner begs them to stop. And, from the sounds of it, possibly sexually assaulting said partner, as well. And that is unacceptable and absolutely should be investigated thoroughly. Because what happens between two people in the bounds of their relationship becomes the business of other people when one partner is beating the shit out out of and/or raping the other one. That is everyone's business.
Bolded is debatable, in the video she states that he started it, while he claims later that she did.
Basically it's "he said, she said" in regards to who started it, although who started it is irrelevant as to whether what happened later is an appropriate response (it's not).
- - - Updated - - -
I find it kindof amazing that you're admitting to assault on a public forum. Not just once in this thread, but several times.
I'm not a MRA, just an anti-feminist (titled misogynist-king)
Nonetheless, that sounded like abuse
Abuse is abuse, regardless of gender, police need to step in when things get out of control like this (especially with alcohol involved)
I have some experience with kink and yes, theatrical displays like this do occur, but this doesn't seem like a scene
Also... I thought Furitrix was a girl? I get confused with all the avatars, not that it matters, next I'll find out Linadra or Celista is a dude
Nah, it was actually easy to infer from the context if you bothered to read it rather than let the outrage boil to your head preemptively.
Read it again, you were wrong for reading it incorrectly and then making assumption. Nothing wrong with how he formulated his post.
- - - Updated - - -
I get what you mean, but it's not like someone else spread it for them. It happened on Twitch - they effectively broadcast it themselves.
Agreed. If a guy is getting beat up by a man, woman, etc. offer help.
If a girl is getting beat up by a man, woman, etc. offer help.
When the situation calms down, you can go and try and clear down what exactly happened and what should be done.
- - - Updated - - -
Another person who lacks reading comprehension.
Re-read it, and stop flying off the handle based on your own sexist assumptions.
If she started it by hitting him first. Bitch, keep your hands to yourself, sentence served.
If he started it by hitting her first. Bitch, keep your hands to yourself. Lock his ass up for assault for a while.
You guys are too eager to bitch about sexism, and would rather make assumptions than actually read what is being posted.
It's quite obvious if you combine "bitch keep your hands to yourself" and "lock his ass up for assault for a while.", that he referred to the dude as the bitch.
This is not rocket science. It's basic context.
"You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist."
Friedrich Nietzsche
It really is disturbing to me that someone would defend abuse at all, but its equally as disturbing that someone could hear an audio clip and surmise that rape occurred, or that someone "beat the shit" out of someone.
To me it sounds like he slapped her a few times and she was crying. That was it. It doesn't sound like rape, and it doesn't sound like he beat the shit out of her, or kicked her teeth in or anything crazy.
Regardless of what happened, i am glad that the internet detectives are right onto the case to hang him from the nearest tree instead of letting the real law enforcement deal with him and potentially her if she started it.
For a moment I thought I partially agreed with what he was saying (then he said the "Sometimes women cry, only to moments later feel all content and satisfied about the fact they've been made to cry by their man..." bit and I facepalmed). But even with that being said, there's still some truth to that particular post, regardless of his weird reason as to why. If you just suspect that a person you know suffers from domestic violence and you don't have any hard data, your interference may tip off the perpetrator and cause him to escalate (not saying you should do nothing). So in that context, saying that "there is a pretty fat chance you won't actually be helping her at all. The opposite, rather." has some truth to it.
Of course, in a case like the one from the OP, you have reasonable suspicion to interfere. Especially the government, since in most countries they don't need the potential victim's blessing (and are obligated) to issue proceedings when they are alerted of a potential crime happening.