Ignorant for sure but i wouldnt call it racist, as i believe that word has a specific meaning, though if people use the very loose and widely applicable version of 'racist', then yeah, anyone who has any opinion on any race is racist and only those who hold no opinion whatsoever can be considered not racist, but even then 'they should care more about minority races' and if they dont they are racist, so... yeah fuck it, everyone running for president is racist, every single damn one along with all their followers and every single god damn human with any intellectual capacity.
What are we gonna do now? Taking off his turban, they said, is this man a Jew?
'Cause they're working for the clampdown
They put up a poster saying we earn more than you!
When we're working for the clampdown
We will teach our twisted speech To the young believers
We will train our blue-eyed men To be young believers
Same reason anyone believes they will survive their vote every year.
- - - Updated - - -
Everyone does it. They say one thing during the primary and change into the general. Gotta win the primary first then you have to win over the independents.
Seems these days when you remove the idiotic far-left/rights out of the equation the rational left/right people that tend to fall more so near center seem to be very much a like.
Trump seems much more Right toward centre than Hillary does left toward centre. I'd say Trump is a far more rational candidate than Hillary and that Bernie is a much better opponent for Trump than Hillary.
Hillary is literally the biggest piece of shit between the 3.
If the Democrats were more like Donald Trump instead of pieces of crap that act like they want mindless zombies instead of supporters I'd at least consider supporting their nominees. However the Democrats have turned me completely against them. I'd rather die than vote for Hillary or any of the other pieces of crap that make up the modern Democrat party.
Both parties in the US are fairly far right in the spectrum of politics
Noirluna the Immortal of Proudmoore
Trump basically hit a high note with the blue collared working class. A demographic that usually gives very little fuck about politics. All bets are off now.
The left wing loathes the blue collars, the perception is that they all vote to the right because they are uneducated religious zealots that vote to the right to put prayer back in the classroom.
But the reality is that the left claims to be all about the little guy; but in reality all of the help programs the left ever offers always seem to have caveats attached to them based on the colour of your skin and what equipment is between your legs.
The left hates the working class because the working class live in a bubble universe where progressive identity politics aren't needed. When you're working your fingers to the bone every day you don't have time to judge your co-workers on the colour of their skin, where they were born, what gender they are, what their sexual orientation is, etc. You are judged based on how well the people around you can count on you, every. single. time. Identity politics are a luxury invention of the bourgeois. So that just leaves one thing the working class actually gives a fuck about;
Security. Job security, home security, national security. Your average working class Joe doesn't benefit from a social safety net that is repurposed to serve progressive identity politics.
This I know because I started from the bottom (now I'm here).
The only two candidates that even bothered to actually speak to the hearts of the working class instead of using them as comedical political fodder were Bernie Sanders, and Donald Trump. Trump has all the wrong things to say... but he's saying something other than "You can be spectators, but not participants" And Sanders doesn't look like he'll get the nomination at this point.
So Donald Trump is the anti-hero of the working class; which is better than nothing at all.
Thats my problem with the term, any observation, whether positive or negative, regarding a race is now considered racist, the word has clearly lost its meaning as now everyone and his dog is considered racist to someone. It is simply used as slander because its just a versatile type of mud that sticks. Reminds me of those 'journalists' who tried to discredit ron paul by harassing him about a report that implied black people run fast that he said he didnt even write. By constantly throwing mud at him they forced him to talk about race issues and pick a side.
For instance this white privilege bullshit only exists because people keep perpetuating that all whites are rich, and the rich are privileged, therefore all whites are privileged. Never mind blacks born into wealthy families who are more privileged than whites from poor families. I think the white privilege bs is genuinely used to hurt white people probably due to some genuine racism towards them, but even then its not the fact that white skin has privileges, but rather wealth, but thats just far too fucking obvious if we were to say that the wealthy are privileged, and then you cant play the race card and blame your circumstances on race rather than effort.
A better way to classify this is to say that THE POOR are disadvantaged, and need help over the rich, which i doubt many, if anyone, would disagree with!
Same with crime, people say blacks are bad because they commit more crime, next people jump to their defence spouting nonsense like white privilege to discredit, without dealing with the issue. The facts are that blacks do commit more crime, but it isnt because they are black, but more than likely they are poor and poor people commit more crime simply out of necessity. Poor whites commit more crime than well off whites, but no shit huh. If you follow that conversation with charity, you would recognize that crime is a problem, but its not racially specific but economically, next you can work towards fixing that issue, together instead of against eachother.
Saying that crime among blacks is a problem though isnt frikkin racist. Implying that your opinion doesnt matter because of your skin color on the other hand though is.
Is that really hypocritical or an evolution?
Go back 20 years and see who, politician or not, was in favor of gay marriage. Move ahead year by year and see how everyones opinion changes year by year to where those people are now.
Would it not be trouble some if people never changed their point of view?
If trump gets elected, he will still be the typical, trickle down economics, deregulation and cronyism president like most republicans. I think he will be a lot like bush jr. He will probably start a major war somewhere and a lot of the Americans tax payer money will be flushed down the toilet with bad no negotiation government contracts.
An evolution that just happened to occur right when she needed to gain voters on left? Not likely.
She's a hypocritical piece of shit that is just using it as a way to gain votes.
- - - Updated - - -
I know right, because Democrats are completely against war. Like how Obama in the last 7 years has withdrawn American forces from Warzones they shouldn't be in.
Oh wait.
And yet based on what the candidates are actually saying and their history he is less likely to support those policies than either of his competitors on the left. When people refer to politicians as dishonest, they usually don't assume that they are lying about NOT having their interests in mind and then changing to their side.