So, beta launch mean that the class are pretty much finished, time to get ready to reroll?
In WOD the healing tuning was done on the day mythic opened. So numbers aren't really the issue until then.
Focus feedback on utility and talents/spells that needs a mechanical pass, I don't really expect talents to change at this point, but if people tell them about mechanical issues of some talents (Essence Font), they might listen.
Let's hope it won't be 90% about Soothing Mist.
Also, feel free to give feedback about leveling as a mistweaver and how dps is and why you probably swapped to windwalker due to how bad it was. I tried hard, not sure we got any improvements about it.
it's going to be 90% soothing mist because people circlejerk it.
people are ignoring that active soothing mist fixes no problems with the class and only services "mah fantasy"
people who are not in beta can't give feedback, right? That's a shame.
I think you can on the official forums? Just because someone doesn't have the beta, doesn't mean they can't give their opinion or feedback on it
Anyway, after following this thread since it's inception, I do wonder how many people are posting hyperboles. I get that a spec can be to your taste or not, but reading this thread, I get the impression that no Mythic guild would use a MW, and that they will be less common than owners of the Time Lost Proto Drake. (hey hyperbole!)
I just really wonder how many people are being led by the negativity... :/
Last edited by mmoca8e5207dce; 2016-05-13 at 11:32 PM.
I don't understand how it's hyperbole. There isn't a reason to actively seek out a mistweaver monk right now in Legion. Just like there wasn't a reason to seek out a holy priest in 6.2.
If you have a mistweaver and you're a world 250 and beyond guild, having a mistweaver isn't going to halt your progression. But as soon as you get into the real of "competitive raiding" mistweaver isn't a class that exists in world of warcraft.
It's also not anyone's fault here if people read "mistweaver sucks in mythic because it lacks tools/utility" as "omg mistweaver sucks dick in general".
Last edited by Supliftz; 2016-05-13 at 04:22 PM.
There's a difference between farm and progression, MWs have solo healed Arch, geared to the teeth and well played. The problem comes that at low gear levels (like progressions where ilevels are low) than other healers are often quite stronger, brings strong raid tools which in top 100 guilds offsets the lack of gear.
When MWs worry about tools we bring outside of just throughput, they worry about not being benched on progression.
And this does have a trickle down effect because representation at high levels encourage players at low levels to try out a class. When Holy Paladins are well represented, are doing cool things people are inspired to play that class. Whether we like it or not Mistweaver is very low in representation, monks in general have terrible retention rates and that is partly to do with an unorthodox style (that a lot of us love unfortunately), but puts people off from picking us up. MWs are just not seen at all levels being strong so unfortunately there is a real stigma that when a MW is shown dominating in any way it has to do with the class being broken and needing nerfs.
Legion's MW changes make us a lot closer to other healers and the weirdness of the class has been gotten rid of. But there really isn't anything cool that this class does either now. We'll be good, but we won't be great like Druid/Paladins will be, and arguably Disc/Holy Priests. There really isn't anything MW does that's flashy like a wings or a savage roar totem that attracts players by 'cool things' either. So MW won't be so bad it's unplayable, but I seriously doubt it will be represented as a core healer in a progression guild.
Last edited by Myta; 2016-05-13 at 09:07 PM.
Mistweaver Tax noun 1. The effect of both high mana costs, and lack of utility, coupled with requiring specific talent combinations to compete with other healers, while still not being able to compete with toolkits said healers have baseline in any competitive area.
At this point, I can really see myself maining a mistweaver for Legion. I'll just have to be constantly drunk in order to enjoy it.
Druid, Paladin or Monk, at this point... Probably Druid.
Hi
That's exactly what I meant, really
See, the first part, is what I mean with hyperbole, since (as you put it later in your reply) there is a reason to actively seek out a MW, unless you're a competitive rading guild - because then you won't, and I totally understand that. But what if you're not in that category? What if you're someone who does like the new incarnation of MW and want to raid? Monkioh and you (as two sources that I respect and trust) say that that is no problem.Originally Posted by Suplift
But, people reading "omg mw is useless, better reroll" could be led by negativity whilst they could have fun, and actually be a decent asset to a (non-hardcore) raiding guild.