You say murder... the law says Justifyable Homicide (Homicide: Killing in self defense. Aka: Stand Your Ground Laws). "It wouldn't surprise me" if you thought other acts of defense were "murder" as well despite the actual facts of the cases.
Now... stop posting here, and go back to your safe place and protests against Evil Capitalistic Cop Pigs who have the audacity to carry guns - or, more accurately called, slavery sticks.
[color=blue]This thread has lived beyond its life expectancy. ... It's also met the forum quota for posters insulting the intelligence of their peers to grasp the age-old upper hand in argumentation, I believe officially coined by Plato: "Ur, like, dumb and that's why I'm right." Zarhym
They aren't "profiting" from his death. The lengths you and this blog post go to defend a known narcissist like GZ is pretty fucking awesome, though. Who knew what it took to defend a wife/gf beating, police officer shoving, no job having, delusional narcissist, in order to keep your narrative going.
TM parents amde at least 1.5 million or more. Most from the Wrongful; death suit against the Home owners association settlement then money from the TRayvon Martin foundation of which his parents are paid employees, and money made from selling of the " I am Trayvon" tee shirts
As someone who grew up in the ghetto, it's not always the parents fault. I've seen it myself over and over again.
A nice kid I met in 5th grade and who for a while became one of my best friends growing up ended up being a high school drop out and gang banger. He went from being a smart nerd and gamer to a typical Crip who got sent to jail for a stabbing. I knew both of his parents who worked their ass off to give him and his sister everything and because the kid hanged with the wrong crowd, he turned into a statistic.
So in your eyes, the money spent in both the foundation and the t-shirts, were mainly sloganeering and graft?
- - - Updated - - -
Of course he did. He said TM circled his vehicle, he didn't know an address, yet knew of the the cul de sac 100 50 yards away, and felt compelled to leave his vehicle, even though he knew how to get to his location from the clubhouse. He has a personality disorder, he craves attention, and TM was one of many victims in his life.
Ok tell you what, back it up.
- - - Updated - - -
Bigot Logic 101:
Person X runs away from armed Person Y and Person Y why gives chase.
Based on that sentence...it makes more sense that the fleeing Person X hid in the bushes to ambush armed Person Y instead of Person X hiding in the bushes from armed Person Y.
- - - Updated - - -
Of fucking course it matters. That;s ridiculous.
If GZ started the fight, then TM kicking his ass is TM standing his ground.
- - - Updated - - -
This person should be banned.
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
IF TM knew he was armed he would not have attacked him unless he was nuts. If he felt his life was endanger he had ample time to call police, get home or hide.
GZ had the wounds to show he was attacked. TM did not have any wounds other then the gun shot to show that GZ had started to assault him first. The evidenc edid not prove 2nd degree murder no matter how much you want it to be. You keep assuming that TM knew GZ was armed. In his sworn testimony TM threatened to kill him as he was bashing his skull into the concrete. GZ sworn testimony that he also passed a voice stress analysis test , stated that his jacket rode up exposing his firearm and that TM reached for it.
Despite what you think it is not breaking the law to follow someone who you think is acting suspicious. You are really very emotional about this, maybe you need a snickers?
Gahhhh.
No GZ's wounds show there was a fight. You have no fucking clue who attacked who. You weren't there. In fact, no one was there to see who started the fight.
We do however know for a fact, that TM ran away form GZ who chased after him. That is fact and disputable.
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
Just want to chime in and say the point about voice stress tests is kind of moot. They're not that reliable since everyone reacts differently to being interrogated. Even people who are completely innocent can fail those things if they're nervous just about the act of being interrogated or being in a stressful environment like court investigations. Not saying he's lying but lie detectors/voice stress w/e have been proven to not be the most reliable of technology.
Why they're even used anymore is beyond me. I've read that one can easily botch the calibrations prior by spiking your own blood pressure meaning everything you say doesn't mean a thing. Or rather, intentionally stressing your voice
Last edited by Dug; 2016-05-19 at 04:46 PM.
All I know about him is what South Park said