Oklahoma -- Anti-Abortion law.

[Daelak]

What's the deal with numerous states of the US going backwards on their Laws...

Religious people should really fuck off from Politics, especially in the 21st century.

Over-representation of rural areas of states and on the national level. It's a party that thrives off of lack of participation in our democracy.

[Casterbridge]

Bolded to show the error in your argument.

So the argument really is as simple as it's just a fetus therefore I don't find it human or an individual and so doesn't matter?

I guess I'll never really understand that attitude, and I'll end it here rather than risk the OPs thread and original intent.

[Lenonis]

Unconstitutional? No where in the constitution does it say you should be able to legally kill another human if you didn't plan your pregnancy. Nice try though.

This bill also outlaws abortion for rape and incest victims.

But even so -- the SCOTUS disagrees with you about your interpretation of the constitution and I'm far more inclined to listen to them rather than you on this matter.

[Eliseus]

Roe v. Wade.

This has been settled for decades. Thanks for playing.

That doesn't make it constitutional nor means that laws can't be passed to diminish a stance taken in a court case. Thanks for playing.

Unless you think stuff like woman shouldn't be able to vote shall be reestablished also.

[Daelak]

So the argument really is as simple as it's just a fetus therefore I don't find it human or an individual and so doesn't matter?

I guess I'll never really understand that attitude, and I'll end it here rather than risk the OPs thread and original intent.

It isn't an argument, just a simple state of fact.

[Eliseus]

This bill also outlaws abortion for rape and incest victims.

But even so -- the SCOTUS disagrees with you about your interpretation of the constitution and I'm far more inclined to listen to them rather than you on this matter.

Interesting. Because no where in the constitution does it state you have a right to abortion.

[Gamdwelf]

Over-representation of rural areas of states and on the national level. It's a party that thrives off of lack of participation in our democracy.

Well the other party is thriving by shutting down democracy.

[Eliseus]

Btw, how are you pro-choice by removing choice. Ironic, isn't it.

[Gamdwelf]

Interesting. Because no where in the constitution does it state you have a right to abortion.

Article 3 says babbies are fair game.

[Jotaux]

It isn't an argument, just a simple state of fact.

I'm pro choice but even I concede the point when a fetus become a human is an opinion not a fact.

[Reeve]

So the argument really is as simple as it's just a fetus therefore I don't find it human or an individual and so doesn't matter?

Pretty much. I don't feel guilty when I remove a wart, either.

[Jotaux]

Btw, how are you pro-choice by removing choice. Ironic, isn't it.

Theres a difference between making your own choice and removing another person's choice.

[Reeve]

That doesn't make it constitutional nor means that laws can't be passed to diminish a stance taken in a court case. Thanks for playing.

Um, that's actually EXACTLY what it means. The SCOTUS is who gets to be the arbiter of what is and isn't constitutional.

[Endus]

That doesn't make it constitutional

Roe v. Wade was fundamentally settled over constitutional law, so you're fundamentally wrong about this.

Interesting. Because no where in the constitution does it state you have a right to abortion.

Yes. It does. As Roe v. Wade details. If you bothered to read it.

[Reeve]

Btw, how are you pro-choice by removing choice. Ironic, isn't it.

Removing what choice?

[Eliseus]

Article 3 says babbies are fair game.

Article 3 doesn't mention abortion anywhere.

- - - Updated - - -

Theres a difference between making your own choice and removing another person's choice.

So making a choice to remove another person's choice is pro-choice?

[Reeve]

So making a choice to remove another person's choice is pro-choice?

What other person's choice is being removed?

[Endus]

Article 3 doesn't mention abortion anywhere.

If nothing else, the existence of the 9th Amendment makes your argument completely moot.

A right does not have to be explicitly mentioned in the Constitution to be protected by that Constitution. According to the Constitution.

[Eliseus]

Roe v. Wade was fundamentally settled over constitutional law, so you're fundamentally wrong about this.



Yes. It does. As Roe v. Wade details. If you bothered to read it.

Roe v. Wade is a right to privacy. Thanks for playing.

[Torgent]

I will never understand why our legal system allows them to constantly propose and sign things that are unconstitutional without punishment. In the past year we've seen many bills that are just obviously not legal to enforce.