Which confirms what I said. You believe the film is 'Notcraft' and therefore you HAVE already made up your mind. The difference between you and the reviewer of the article is that he has seen the film. You have not.
Your objection to the film is therefore based on it's deviation from the source material. At this point, we don't know how great or how small the deviation is...we only know that it exists.
You have decided to judge the film regardless based upon the fact that there ARE deviations. In truth, like the rest of us, you have no opinion of value to give.
Because none of us have seen it.
It was trash. So many loopholes, pseudo-intellectualism (at best) drivel, emperor's new clothes to the extreme ... and just plain dumb writing. The movie was a social experiment, I'm convinced. They said "let's make a terrible film and then seed great reviews from respected people and watch the sheep follow suit."
I'm not talking about the show but the actor. He has recieved a lot of attention for the way he plays his characters. Vikings is one of the biggest shows running atm so i'm not sure what you are on about.
Does it have the super high quality A+ celebs? No. Not really. But a lot of the more recent popular films didnt
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
Hey man could you take a pic of that article and name the reviewer? It's probably faster than typing it Thanks.
Also which month of the SFX do you have with that article? I couldn't find it in the July 2016 one.
Thanks again.
some people are saying it was the best thing they have seen since lotr ....
.
i am rather skeptical .... cgi shots look horrible , and as i said before, some of the orc faces look like retarded characters from the predator series.
Last edited by Dystemper; 2016-05-22 at 01:14 PM.
Oh, don't you worry, even though it'll probably be as mediocre as Age of Apocalypse (if not outright as bad as Batman v. Superman), the apologists will immediately crowd around to shout down any position that isn't "This Is The Greatest Movie Of All Time!"
- - - Updated - - -
Exactly. But sshhhh, don't tell the fanboys that!
- - - Updated - - -
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
- - - Updated - - -
It is Notcraft, & the deviations are obviously major. It's unfortunate that you're not familiar with the Lore enough to spot them all by yourself, since I can't be bothered to line them all up yet again, but regardless, I can assure you, the deviations are major.
They wanted a Warcraft Cinematic Universe. They had a chance to make that, right until they let Chris "I am God" Metzen get his grubby paws all over the script. Now, they'll be lucky to get a Trilogy out of something that could have had 12+ movies.
When the hell has a Marvel Cinematic Universe movie ever not been "so far removed" from its source material?
Have you even read Age of Ultron? Do you even know the synopsis? Winter Soldier? No? You think Infinity War will be a loyal, truthful adaptation of the original story? Don't delude yourself. Ragnarok won't follow the original story either, for that matter. Just, FYI, you know.
I don't understand how 80s fantasy adventure is a bad thing to be like in any way, expecially for a franchise that launched 1994. That honestly makes me more excited for it as a Trek fan who loves older sci-fi fantasy stuff and feels the new has gotten overwrought trying to "prove" why fantasy is a genre with literary value instead of just living it by embracing the genre with deeper world building and characters than the dull messes--which read like middle school novels by authors who couldn't hold a plot together so they pretended they didn't want to tell a story--that naysayers of fantasy hail as "true art." Let the haters hate and embrace fantasy.
Last edited by Firefall; 2016-05-22 at 02:01 PM.