An exclusive look at the scene afterwards is quite revealing;
An exclusive look at the scene afterwards is quite revealing;
Last edited by mmoc52e6c71cb0; 2016-05-23 at 09:12 AM.
Doubtful. Even teenage boys are subject to the refractory period. At a certain point they're gonna be unable to maintain an ereaction and/or ejaculate satisfactorly.
When I was a teen, I never knew a boy who could go over and over. It would likely be quite the exception for boys to do so- and they would be one helluva stud if they could!
Open and frank in discussing sex and sexuality. They did not view nudity, sex and gender conservatively.
In retrospect my wording is, terrible in that post. Hmm. Well, I messed that up then.
Last edited by Fencers; 2016-05-23 at 12:16 PM.
Now I wonder if her future husband/s will ever know about this.
Lol.
"Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.” - General James Mattis
i chose both should be punished because you cant just have flash gangbangs. these things take time and extreme planning to get all parties involved at the right times. what if big dick tommy hits it first? the 24 other teenage boys cant hang with him! no, BD Tommy has to go last, sorry horse shafts, the drawback to being well endowed is that you have to go last in gangbangs.
- - - Updated - - -
oh im sure her first 3 husbands were in the group of 25
No sense crying over spilt beer, unless you're drunk...
So the article says that "a bunch of football players were suspended". Was the girl suspended or was this all blamed on the guys?
God..imagine the twenty-fifth guy's experience..
So where's the video? ( ͡ ͡° ͜ ʖ ͡ ͡° )
With the same volume and pressure of ejaculate? That would indeed be a rather impressive exception if so.
But even allowing for a few minutes between each girl, a man popping 25 times with 25 girls would be a spectacular outlier.
- - - Updated - - -
Ha, it's common on the Internet. Everyone has an inflated sense of self to one degree or another. Comes with the territory of digital life.
Are you being intentionally thick? I never even mentioned anything about being opposed to sex. I'm opposed to idiot teens making recordings of their acts.
Law has decided here. It's kiddieporn. Strawman? Get over yourself and look up things before you make an even bigger fool of yourself.
You like to pretend you know things when you really don't. How about you realize that and stop spewing your ignorant nonsense in reply to a post I made? I never asked for your 'opinion'.
Reading seems to be hard for you so need assistance? You said something about police not knowing shit about tech stuff, I replied they might have caught up to the point where they know phones can also record images. Way to ignore... uhm... words? Keep on keeping on.