Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
... LastLast
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    Their invasion was kind of like one brother slapping the next, a little struggle and the fight was over with both still being brothers.
    Communist countries tend to be distrustful of one another as a rule. It's not as if the Soviets, Chinese, Vietnamese, and North Koreans were all just one big happy socialist family united in opposition against the Western powers, they were always constantly backstabbing and manipulating each other trying to jockey for power.

  2. #22
    And for those who say Communist countries are like brothers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-S...order_conflict

  3. #23
    Elemental Lord
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    8,527
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    That is because the US Army was not giving the freedom to invade the North. Same as the scenario in the Korean War. The commanding generals in both cases had their hands tied.
    You did invade NK, you got beaten back once China started backing them.

  4. #24
    The Unstoppable Force Ghostpanther's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    USA, Ohio
    Posts
    24,112
    Quote Originally Posted by caervek View Post
    You did invade NK, you got beaten back once China started backing them.
    MacArthur was ordered back and not to strike back in China. When he criticized Truman publicly for not fighting a war to win, he was relieved of his command.

  5. #25
    Titan I Push Buttons's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    11,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    MacArthur was ordered back and not to strike back in China. When he criticized Truman publicly for not fighting a war to win, he was relieved of his command.
    Well I mean the guy also wanted to use tactical nukes on advancing military formations so......... He went off the deep end in that war.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    We should not be selling arms to any communist country. If he thinks Vietnam would ever become our ally in a conflict with China, he is dreaming. :P
    I don't think we ever plan on going to war with China, so your entire argument is moot to begin with.

  7. #27
    Deleted
    He wants to go out with a bang.

  8. #28
    Banned Orlong's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Class 1,000,000 Clean Room
    Posts
    13,127
    Of course he did. Hes just continuing on with his pathetic apology tour. Next up Hiroshima!!. Cant wait till we get President Trump installed so we no longer will be going around bowing to everyone. They will be bowing to us!!

  9. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by Orlong View Post
    Of course he did. Hes just continuing on with his pathetic apology tour. Next up Hiroshima!!. Cant wait till we get President Trump installed so we no longer will be going around bowing to everyone. They will be bowing to us!!
    what the hell are you talking about, there is a thing called diplomacy, and making ties with nations, in order to generate bargaining power in zones of interest (southeastern asia). also, vietnam had recieved a lot of us private investment, and can be an ally now. realpolitik, and pragmatism, it's time to learn that
    Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker



  10. #30
    Deleted
    Next civil war scenario: Vietnam.

    I'd move out of the place fast.

  11. #31
    Banned Orlong's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Class 1,000,000 Clean Room
    Posts
    13,127
    Quote Originally Posted by Thepersona View Post
    what the hell are you talking about, there is a thing called diplomacy, and making ties with nations, in order to generate bargaining power in zones of interest (southeastern asia). also, vietnam had recieved a lot of us private investment, and can be an ally now. realpolitik, and pragmatism, it's time to learn that
    All he does is apologize for the US. Hes bowed to the Saudi King, and recently apologized to Cuba as well. Always saying the problems were our fault. Heres just a sample of many more times he has done it, and I am sick and tired of Obama bending over to every other country.

    A common theme that runs through President Obama's statements is the idea the United States must atone for its past policies, whether it is America's application of the war against Islamist terrorism or its overall foreign policy. At the core of this message is the concept that the U.S. is a flawed nation that must seek redemption by apologizing for its past "sins."

    On several occasions, President Obama has sought to apologize for the actions of his own country when addressing a foreign audience--including seven of the 10 apologies listed below. The President has already apologized for his country to nearly 3 billion people across Europe, the Muslim world, and the Americas.

    The Obama Administration's strategy of unconditional engagement with America's enemies combined with a relentless penchant for apology-making is a dangerous recipe for failure. The overall effect of this approach has been to weaken American power on the world stage rather than strengthen it.

    President Obama's personal approval ratings across much of the world may be sky high, but that has not translated into greater support for U.S.-led initiatives, such as the NATO mission in Afghanistan, which is heavily dependent on American and British troops. The U.S. is increasingly viewed as a soft touch internationally, which has encouraged rogue regimes such as North Korea and Iran to accelerate their nuclear and missile programs.

    As President Obama embarks this week on his second major overseas tour, which will take him to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Germany, and France, the world does not need yet another apology from the President. Rather, it is looking for strong and principled leadership from the most powerful nation on the face of the earth. American leadership is not a popularity contest, nor should it be an exercise in self-loathing. Rather, it is about taking tough positions that will be met with hostility in many parts of the globe. Above all, it demands the assertive projection of American power, both to secure the homeland and to protect America's allies.

    The following is a list of the 10 most significant apologies by the President of the United States in his first four months of office as they relate to foreign policy and national security issues.

    1. Apology to France and Europe ("America Has Shown Arrogance")

    Speech by President Obama, Rhenus Sports Arena, Strasbourg, France, April 3, 2009.[1]

    So we must be honest with ourselves. In recent years we've allowed our Alliance to drift. I know that there have been honest disagreements over policy, but we also know that there's something more that has crept into our relationship. In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.
    2. Apology to the Muslim World ("We Have Not Been Perfect")

    President Obama, interview with Al Arabiya, January 27, 2009.[2]

    My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy. We sometimes make mistakes. We have not been perfect. But if you look at the track record, as you say, America was not born as a colonial power, and that the same respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as recently as 20 or 30 years ago, there's no reason why we can't restore that.
    3. Apology to the Summit of the Americas ("At Times We Sought to Dictate Our Terms")

    President Obama, address to the Summit of the Americas opening ceremony, Hyatt Regency, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, April 17, 2009.[3]

    All of us must now renew the common stake that we have in one another. I know that promises of partnership have gone unfulfilled in the past, and that trust has to be earned over time. While the United States has done much to promote peace and prosperity in the hemisphere, we have at times been disengaged, and at times we sought to dictate our terms. But I pledge to you that we seek an equal partnership. There is no senior partner and junior partner in our relations; there is simply engagement based on mutual respect and common interests and shared values. So I'm here to launch a new chapter of engagement that will be sustained throughout my administration.
    The United States will be willing to acknowledge past errors where those errors have been made.
    4. Apology at the G-20 Summit of World Leaders ("Some Restoration of America's Standing in the World")

    News conference by President Obama, ExCel Center, London, United Kingdom, April 2, 2009.[4]

    I would like to think that with my election and the early decisions that we've made, that you're starting to see some restoration of America's standing in the world. And although, as you know, I always mistrust polls, international polls seem to indicate that you're seeing people more hopeful about America's leadership.
    I just think in a world that is as complex as it is, that it is very important for us to be able to forge partnerships as opposed to simply dictating solutions. Just to try to crystallize the example, there's been a lot of comparison here about Bretton Woods. "Oh, well, last time you saw the entire international architecture being remade." Well, if there's just Roosevelt and Churchill sitting in a room with a brandy, that's an easier negotiation. But that's not the world we live in, and it shouldn't be the world that we live in.
    5. Apology for the War on Terror ("We Went off Course")

    President Obama, speech at the National Archives, Washington, D.C., May 21, 2009.[5]

    Unfortunately, faced with an uncertain threat, our government made a series of hasty decisions. I believe that many of these decisions were motivated by a sincere desire to protect the American people. But I also believe that all too often our government made decisions based on fear rather than foresight; that all too often our government trimmed facts and evidence to fit ideological predispositions. Instead of strategically applying our power and our principles, too often we set those principles aside as luxuries that we could no longer afford. And during this season of fear, too many of us--Democrats and Republicans, politicians, journalists, and citizens--fell silent.
    In other words, we went off course. And this is not my assessment alone. It was an assessment that was shared by the American people who nominated candidates for President from both major parties who, despite our many differences, called for a new approach--one that rejected torture and one that recognized the imperative of closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay.
    6. Apology for Guantanamo in France ("Sacrificing Your Values")

    Speech by President Obama, Rhenus Sports Arena, Strasbourg, France, April 3, 2009.[6]

    Our two republics were founded in service of these ideals. In America, it is written into our founding documents as "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." In France: "Liberté"--absolutely--"egalité, fraternité." Our moral authority is derived from the fact that generations of our citizens have fought and bled to uphold these values in our nations and others. And that's why we can never sacrifice them for expedience's sake. That's why I've ordered the closing of the detention center in Guantanamo Bay. That's why I can stand here today and say without equivocation or exception that the United States of America does not and will not torture.
    In dealing with terrorism, we can't lose sight of our values and who we are. That's why I closed Guantanamo. That's why I made very clear that we will not engage in certain interrogation practices. I don't believe that there is a contradiction between our security and our values. And when you start sacrificing your values, when you lose yourself, then over the long term that will make you less secure.
    7. Apology before the Turkish Parliament ("Our Own Darker Periods in Our History")

    Speech by President Obama to the Turkish Parliament, Ankara, Turkey, April 6, 2009.[7]

    Every challenge that we face is more easily met if we tend to our own democratic foundation. This work is never over. That's why, in the United States, we recently ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed. That's why we prohibited--without exception or equivocation--the use of torture. All of us have to change. And sometimes change is hard.
    Another issue that confronts all democracies as they move to the future is how we deal with the past. The United States is still working through some of our own darker periods in our history. Facing the Washington Monument that I spoke of is a memorial of Abraham Lincoln, the man who freed those who were enslaved even after Washington led our Revolution. Our country still struggles with the legacies of slavery and segregation, the past treatment of Native Americans.
    Human endeavor is by its nature imperfect. History is often tragic, but unresolved, it can be a heavy weight. Each country must work through its past. And reckoning with the past can help us seize a better future.
    8. Apology for U.S. Policy toward the Americas ("The United States Has Not Pursued and Sustained Engagement with Our Neighbors")

    Opinion editorial by President Obama: "Choosing a Better Future in the Americas," April 16, 2009.[8]

    Too often, the United States has not pursued and sustained engagement with our neighbors. We have been too easily distracted by other priorities, and have failed to see that our own progress is tied directly to progress throughout the Americas. My Administration is committed to the promise of a new day. We will renew and sustain a broader partnership between the United States and the hemisphere on behalf of our common prosperity and our common security.
    9. Apology for the Mistakes of the CIA ("Potentially We've Made Some Mistakes")

    Remarks by the President to CIA employees, CIA Headquarters, Langley, Virginia, April 20, 2009.[9] The remarks followed the controversial decision to release Office of Legal Counsel memoranda detailing CIA enhanced interrogation techniques used against terrorist suspects.

    So don't be discouraged by what's happened in the last few weeks. Don't be discouraged that we have to acknowledge potentially we've made some mistakes. That's how we learn. But the fact that we are willing to acknowledge them and then move forward, that is precisely why I am proud to be President of the United States, and that's why you should be proud to be members of the CIA.
    10. Apology for Guantanamo in Washington ("A Rallying Cry for Our Enemies")

    President Obama, speech at the National Archives, Washington, D.C., May 21, 2009.[10]

    There is also no question that Guantanamo set back the moral authority that is America's strongest currency in the world. Instead of building a durable framework for the struggle against al Qaeda that drew upon our deeply held values and traditions, our government was defending positions that undermined the rule of law. In fact, part of the rationale for establishing Guantanamo in the first place was the misplaced notion that a prison there would be beyond the law--a proposition that the Supreme Court soundly rejected. Meanwhile, instead of serving as a tool to counter terrorism, Guantanamo became a symbol that helped al Qaeda recruit terrorists to its cause. Indeed, the existence of Guantanamo likely created more terrorists around the world than it ever detained.
    So the record is clear: Rather than keeping us safer, the prison at Guantanamo has weakened American national security. It is a rallying cry for our enemies.

    http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...d-a-superpower


    Obama is just a big bitch!!

  12. #32
    Step 1: Arm other nations / groups
    Step 2: Let Time Pass
    Step 3: Enter war with nations / groups we have armed
    Step 4: ???
    Step 5: Repeat constantly throughout history.

    (Thank the CIA for a lot of that bullshit)

  13. #33
    We shouldn't sell weapons to any country. We should allocate use of weapons to allies in the event they need them. Delivery upon threat, return after use. Fuck this proliferation into the hands of our future (and in some cases current) enemies.

  14. #34
    Titan Lenonis's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    14,394
    Quote Originally Posted by Orlong View Post
    Obama is just a big bitch!!
    Other than not being willing to fulfill your fantasies about the US being a world bully that spits in the faces of other country's leaders, and assuming your ranting is true and interpreted exactly how you are claiming, what harm is being done here?

    Because while he's supposedly going around apologizing to everyone and making us super weak he's also killing scores of ISIS leaders and leading something like 7 military conflicts in the middle east.

  15. #35
    Warchief Bollocks's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    La Paz, Bolivia
    Posts
    2,112
    Quote Originally Posted by Orlong View Post
    Of course he did. Hes just continuing on with his pathetic apology tour. Next up Hiroshima!!. Cant wait till we get President Trump installed so we no longer will be going around bowing to everyone. They will be bowing to us!!
    Well the US did horrible acts in Vietnam. Agentw naranja or whatever it's name is in English comeS to my mind.

    Also this seems like strategic diplomacy against China rather than "bowing down"
    Last edited by Bollocks; 2016-05-23 at 05:49 PM.

  16. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by bollocks View Post
    Well the US did horrible acts in Vietnam. Agentw naranja or whatever it's name is in English comeS to my mind.

    Also this seems like strategic diplomacy against China rather than "bowing down"
    to these people the use of diplomacy is a sign of weakness. let be the US be the world bully, and dont use any resemblance of logic! USA! USA!
    Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker



  17. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by Orlong View Post
    Of course he did. Hes just continuing on with his pathetic apology tour. Next up Hiroshima!!. Cant wait till we get President Trump installed so we no longer will be going around bowing to everyone. They will be bowing to us!!
    This is a joke.

    Vietnam has just retrofitted their port at Cam Ranh Bay to service warships, namely warships the size of a US aircraft carrier. Cam Ranh Bay is considered one of the best ports for such things in all of East Asia. And it's right on China's doorstep. It would be like China opening a base in the Yucatan Penninsula in Mexico.

    Our two countries are circling each other for a strategic partnership, to help contain China. Vietnam's concerns are as great as our own so we're working together.

    It's very simple. Do you want to win? Do you want to beat the Chinese? Do you want to keep US being powerful internationally and in the West Pacific? Then you turn China's neighbors against it. You partner up, let bygones be bygones and work out how together we can foil China's expansionist ambitions.

    That means dropping 50 year old grievances nobody cares about anymore, and whose resolution doesn't matter, and becoming Vietnam's new best friend.

    Or you can do what you propose Orlong, which is to make pointless stands that nobody cares about, and watch a China makes nice with its neighbors at our expense. The US is in such a good position in the Pacific at the moment - China has alienated EVERYBODY and they're all looking to strike up a relationship with us. We'd be missing the opportunity of a life time not to capitalize on it.

  18. #38
    Banned Orlong's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Class 1,000,000 Clean Room
    Posts
    13,127
    Quote Originally Posted by bollocks View Post
    Well the US did horrible acts in Vietnam. Agentw naranja or whatever it's name is in English comeS to my mind.

    Also this seems like strategic diplomacy against China rather than "bowing down"
    Yeah and Vietnam didnt do anything horrible and were totally innocent

  19. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by Orlong View Post
    Yeah and Vietnam didnt do anything horrible and were totally innocent
    Who cares?

    They're useful now. That's all that matters.

  20. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by Orlong View Post
    Yeah and Vietnam didnt do anything horrible and were totally innocent
    That's old Cold War stuff, the Cold War ended in what? 1989?
    .

    "This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."

    -- Capt. Copeland

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •