Angel faced Youtuber, Evalion, kicked off the site after sharing racist views

[Stelio Kontos]

You people are trying to comparing being gay to being an asshole. I don't have to do any mental gymnastics to know that's idiotic.

I'm not, I just find it amusing that someone thinks it's a logically sound position to hold the view of "it's ok to squelch someone's views if I disagree with them".

[Deleted]

Yes, it is, because being gay and being an asshole are not the same thing.

Blue and Red are different colors.
Company named Colortube says that Red is an asshole and he should be banned. Yellow comes in and says: "It's all fine everyone, because Colortube is a private business"
Company named Tonertube bans Blue because some of his videos are breaking the rules. Orange comes in and argues that Blue and Red are different colors, therefore one deserves to be banned and banning of the other one is a discrimination.

I think we're clear on this one. What I'm wondering is if you're Yellow, or Orange.

[nonameelf]

I'm not, I just find it amusing that someone thinks it's a logically sound position to hold the view of "it's ok to squelch someone's views if I disagree with them".

No. If a gay pride youtuber is being an asshole they should also be banned.

Blue and Red are different colors.
Company named Colortube says that Red is an asshole and he should be banned. Yellow comes in and says: "It's all fine everyone, because Colortube is a private business"
Company named Tonertube bans Blue because some of his videos are breaking the rules. Orange comes in and argues that Blue and Red are different colors, therefore one deserves to be banned and banning of the other one is discrimination.

I think we're clear on this one. What I'm wondering is if you're Yellow, or Orange.

This analogy is all kinds of retarded. Want to try again with something less idiotic or are you going to stick with this as your final answer? The fact that you can't see the difference between being gay and being an asshole is rather disturbing as well.

[Felya]

Youtube would have no trouble banning either.
The argument is either good, or not.
You cant say its good when you use it against racists, and bad if you use it against gay people.
Well, you can, but that's called hypocrisy.

Because by definition, evidence of being a racist is antagonizing to patrons. Racists are not banned, such as in this case, until their videos are antagonizing other patrons. There is no hypocrisy, unless you think being racist and gay are the same. But, in that case, someone saying they like apples is a hypocrite because the drive a car.

Ironically enouph, by definition, conclusive evidence of you being gay, would also get you banned in YouTube.

- - - Updated - - -

Youtube would have no trouble banning either.
The argument is either good, or not.
You cant say its good when you use it against racists, and bad if you use it against gay people.
Well, you can, but that's called hypocrisy.

Because by definition, evidence of being a racist is antagonizing to patrons. Racists are not banned, such as in this case, until their videos are antagonizing other patrons. There is no hypocrisy, unless you think being racist and gay are the same. But, in that case, someone saying they like apples is a hypocrite because they drive a car.

Ironically enouph, by definition, conclusive evidence of you being gay, would also get you banned in YouTube.

[Deleted]

No. If a gay pride youtuber is being an asshole they should also be banned.



This analogy is all kinds of retarded. Want to try again with something less idiotic or are you going to stick with this as your final answer? The fact that you can't see the difference between being gay and being an asshole is rather disturbing as well.

I mean I had to go all down to that kind of discussion to get closer to you and you say it's idiotic? Way to insult yourself.

[dd614]

I can't believe someone would describe her as "angel faced"!

I know, right? She looks inbred with a few extra chromosomes.

[nonameelf]

I mean I had to go all down to that kind of discussion to get closer to you and you say it's idiotic? Way to insult yourself.

lol

Whatever makes you feel better. I'm not the one that's having problem seeing the difference between a chosen behavior(being an asshole) and an unchangeable characteristic.

[Felya]

I'm pretty sure both sides of the political spectrum view the other as assholes, that doesn't mean either side should be shut down by the other. Especially in this case, where from what I saw of her videos she was using facts. Even in her more controversial videos like "how to identify a jew" she was using actual physical traits as a basis for her reasoning. Now I am in no way saying that she was right to do this, but it does beg the question if someone made a video titled "How to identify a Brit" or "How to Identify a German" would it get as much attention? I tend to believe the answer is no, and therefore there is a double standard when it comes to free speech.

Are making an argument that you are to tolerate people who call you an asshole? If they think you are an asshole, then you have to convince them you are not an asshole before you can tolerate them. Otherwise, you are tolerating them, by succumbing, not negotiating, debating or even conversing. Being complacent is not tolerance...

[Derpleton]

Are making an argument that you are to tolerate people who call you an asshole? If they think you are an asshole, then you have to convince them you are not an asshole before you can tolerate them. Otherwise, you are tolerating them, by succumbing, not negotiating, debating or even conversing. Being complacent is not tolerance...

I disagree with people that call me an asshole, but I do not doubt their right to call me an asshole, if neither of us are allowed to criticize each other then we both lose.

[Themius]

Which is dumb because they allow all the salty as fuck feminist videos and a myriad of other stupid shit.

Except they have banned many of those videos... as well...

It's a site with a lot of videos...

[nonameelf]

Except they have banned many of those videos... as well...

It's a site with a lot of videos...

Yep, they ban plenty of assholes from all political ideologies. We just only hear about the contrastive ones because they're a bunch of babies.

[Celista]

Female edgelord, the end (Edgelady? Edgelass? Edgedame?).

So ludicrous that I can't take it seriously.

[Rennadrel]

Except they have banned many of those videos... as well...

It's a site with a lot of videos...

I dunno, they keep letting Anita have a platform to keep posting her PMS videos about video games.

[Themius]

I dunno, they keep letting Anita have a platform to keep posting her PMS videos about video games.

So about 500 hours of video is uploaded every minute and for some reason you think one person who isn't banned negates the many that are?

[May90]

Female edgelord, the end (Edgelady? Edgelass? Edgedame?).

So ludicrous that I can't take it seriously.

I don't think it really depends on gender. But yes, "edgelady" sounds about right!

[dextersmith]

And she has that voice. She just isn't allowed to say her ignorant bullshit on youtube. Racists are up in arms and bringing up black people who say "cracker" like it makes what she did better. Because here's the thing about racists...they're usually some of the dumbest people on the planet to believe that skin color actually matters.

You indiscriminately think everyone is racist for supporting free speech. Maybe her beef is based on stereotypes and not color. Racism is racism; trivializing and excusing "cracker" makes you the worst type of sjw, the racist type.

[Deleted]

So about 500 hours of video is uploaded every minute and for some reason you think one person who isn't banned negates the many that are?

She got banned because of publicity. Which Anita has plenty of.

[Bapestar]

You indiscriminately think everyone is racist for supporting free speech. Maybe her beef is based on stereotypes and not color. Racism is racism; trivializing and excusing "cracker" makes you the worst type of sjw, the racist type.

Lol no. Supporting her racist beliefs is racist. And Torgent didn't excuse the word "cracker"....

[Cthulhu 2020]

Yep, they ban plenty of assholes from all political ideologies. We just only hear about the contrastive ones because they're a bunch of babies.

It's kind of like this forum in other words. Mods hand out infractions, but you only hear crying about it from those with a persecution complex. Youtube bans a fuckton of controversial videos, but you only hear about the conservative ones because they love to make a big deal about "muh rights"

[Torgent]

You indiscriminately think everyone is racist for supporting free speech. Maybe her beef is based on stereotypes and not color. Racism is racism; trivializing and excusing "cracker" makes you the worst type of sjw, the racist type.

Failing to read and understand the words and concepts makes you as dumb as the girl who no longer has a youtube channel. I don't think free speech supporters are racist. I think you and your lot complaining about her being banned then directly pointing to a black person and saying "Why aren't they banned? They said cracker!" is ignorant. She wasn't banned for saying the N word, she was banned for constant hate speech. There's a difference. But I don't expect you to see that. I never excused the word cracker, first of all. And second of all, cracker doesn't really carry much meaning behind it. It's a meaningless racial term. If you want to be offended by it, go ahead, but it means nothing.The N word on the other hand does carry some serious negative connotations, but even then is just a word. I don't believe in being offended by words, but if someone wants to be, that's on them.