I guess that policeman 'din du nuffin'?
The cop who put him in the van and handcuffed him wasn't responsible. The guy driving the van wasn't responsible. The guys sitting in the back of the van with him, were they responsible? I guess nobody is really responsible for it, so we don't really have to change anything to make sure it doesn't happen again, because nothing really happened the first time... right?
But the rioters... they're surely responsible.
The rioters are responsible for rioting sure....why wouldn't they be?
Can you give a reasonable scenario where this particular officer is responsible for what happened in the van after it had left and he went on his way back to being a bicycle cop? Or will you just dodge with a "He's not responsible! He's not responsible! Everybody's not responsible!" schtick again.
Everybody is responsible for the lack of justice found here, that's why they're all held accountable for it. That's why you see the rioting, and police officers getting killed randomly, etc.
When there's isn't real justice, you get mob justice. Shouldn't be all gung-ho about cops killing whoever they want and getting away with it, and then wonder why those pesky black people are blocking traffic.
All I'm really saying is, it's entirely up to the cops to get their shit together. That's step 1.
- - - Updated - - -
It creates political capital to make changes. Though, working within the system, you aren't going to get more than token changes.
But if you delude yourself with the idea that you actually can change things within the system, or that the system will respond, this is how that change occurs.
Surely it's as "just" as police officers abducting people off the street who haven't even been accused of a crime, strapping their hands and feet together so they can't move, and then bouncing them around in the back of a van until they die.
Since that's the bar we're starting at, your attempted hyperbole barely exaggerates the real situation. Sure, it sounds like a great idea.
Baltimore riots in 3... 2... 1...
What is shameful is the fact that people get bent all out of shape when a verdict doesn't go they way they want it to. The judge had the evidence, NOT you. There wasn't evidence supporting the charges. Get over yourself.....What you think means absolutely nothing when it comes to this case.
Except he did do something wrong. Primarily he had a switchblade on him which was legal in Maryland but illegal in Baltimore City. Secondly, someone with 20 criminal charges in the past, 5 of which were still active, sprinted away from the police when he saw they were nearby. The police knew exactly who he was and pursued. More than likely he HAD done something else recently that just never got investigated due to the death, but they found the switchblade which was enough.
So exactly where was he abducted and not accused?