No, taking east asians means less crime than if you take africans or middle easterners, they're underrepresented in crime, which means they commit less crimes than Swedes. Not more crime. Feels like crime rates are hard for you to understand.
And yeah, we could have the "luxury of choosing"(Calling a proper immigration policy luxury is retarded.) if the politicians weren't so retarded.
Last edited by mmocfb6c003936; 2016-05-25 at 12:46 AM.
No, there's no such study. There's been no studies on crime and immigrants since 2005 here, people from middle east and africa had like 20-25% crime rate vs like 5% for Swedes, north africans had an overrepresentation of like 2300% or something in rape, meaning if the populations had been at equal levels you'd have 23 rapists from north africa for every one Swede who rapes, that's a huge overrepresentation.
The government refused to order BRÅ to conduct a new study since it was suggested by the Sweden Democrats. It would've shut people up if they had conducted a study and it was found to be a low crime rate, but instead they refuse to order them to conduct a new study. I wonder why. Probably because it's not a low crime rate.
Last edited by mmocfb6c003936; 2016-05-25 at 01:08 AM.
The long time trend is that the crime per capita slowly goes down, but the media have increased focus on serious crimes, in Sweden. Some crime have skyrocket like driving under influence of narcotic drugs becuse earlier the police only did checked if you were drunk.
Now the big question peopel argues about, would crime per capita go down more if we did have a more restrictive refugee policy.
How about we just be civilized and keep the whole innocent till proven guilty? Or should we say "Sorry you were born 1 inch over a line on the map but until you can convince us you're purer than poor we have to treat you like you're scum and deny you access."
Sorry not going to work that way.
They are also looking through the trend of crimes such as rape and domestic assault.
"When you build it, you love it!"
How about actually having a proper immigration policy that means immigration is beneficial to the country and not detrimental?
- - - Updated - - -
This is kind of misleading though. Gone down with what groups? Swedes? If it goes down with Swedes but rises among immigrants or stays at what it was before with those groups, then it will still go down overall, since Swedes make up the largest group in Sweden still.
Like, I've checked things up regarding the crime stuff. We have more violent crime today than we did in the past, more people are not reporting being subjected to violence, according to hospital surveys, and at the same time we have more violence reported in total numbers than 30-40 years ago, despite the reporting rate going down. That means violent crime is up, a lot.
Last edited by mmocfb6c003936; 2016-05-25 at 06:30 AM.
"trust in police is misguided"
Who should we trust? Vigilantes? Borderline nutsos? Scaremongering propaganda?
- - - Updated - - -
Immigration is not detrimental to society Mooneye. Not in the slightest. You wont find ANY paper that states that.
I guess the national economists in Sweden are just plain out wrong. You clearly know better than people like Assar Lindbeck: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assar_Lindbeck, Jan tullberg, Tino Sanandaji(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tino_Sanandaji), right?
It's not hard to find papers that brings up the negative consequences of immigration, you know that, right?
Last edited by mmocfb6c003936; 2016-05-25 at 06:36 AM.
What benefits? The refugees don't work in a high enough rate to be economically beneficial, after 8 years in Sweden only about 1/3 of them have jobs, including state-subsidized jobs. They are more criminal than Swedes, too. Some groups, like the Somali, are at like 20% employment rate. How is that beneficial?
Last edited by mmocfb6c003936; 2016-05-25 at 06:39 AM.