I'm not insecure in my own opinion, I just see no reason to continue arguing with someone who doesn't know how surveys are conducted. You'll probably be going "1000 people aren't enough1!!" next, considering your "didn't ask me" response to me saying that we have surveys. So, on ignore you go, bye.
Last edited by mmocfb6c003936; 2016-05-26 at 07:55 PM.
Yeah, I don't think they're well prepared to deal with those kinds of attacks at all, but people seem to care more about their general safety than the 2011 terrorist attacks when they rate the police as a whole. Maybe if they fuck up during another attack the ratings will go down, but after another 5 years of doing a good job day-to-day they're sure to go back up. I'm not saying those are my opinions either, but those are the opinions of the general population. If you think they're rated higher than they deserve, maybe that's just another proof that they're good at PR.
I mean, if they posted a picture of them dancing in tutu's in the middle of the Utøya scandal, that wouldn't have gone over well and would have easily classified as a PR disaster.
Last edited by Revi; 2016-05-26 at 08:04 PM.
'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
Did Breivik call them and say he's about to gun down some children, so that they knew when it was going to happen? How long does it take to shoot 70 unarmed people with automatic weapons? You'd need to teleport troops there to stop it, and the obvious knowledge of when exactly it's going to take place.
He didn't shoot them all at once, they were spread across the island and many ran/hid. He was walking around finding and killing people for quite a long time.
Hard to say if they could have saved anyone, but it's possible that they could have if they weren't unprepared and messing up on all sides. Communication was a mess, they were slow out of the gate, took a horrible detour, didn't use optimal transportation etc.
The investigation later on concluded that the initial bomb could have prevented if security measures that were supposed to be in place were actually in place, and that they could have stopped him sooner on the island.
In Spain, we have a pretty cool team behind the national police Twitter.
They give insight into the best way to transport marijuana in a plane (better rolled with tobacco so dogs have a harder time sniffing it); and of course remind everyone that it carries administrative sanctions if caught.
Informs us when they have a Christmas party that they'd be going "all in, drinking anything we get our hands on"; so long as you don't drive and respect the norms and the people.
Gave PSAs to popular tunes "♬Bad boys,bad boys♩♬ whatcha gonna do?♬♪ When they come for you? ♬♪ Bad boys,bad boys ♬♪ Remember: we're in 091".
Dabbed into popular series: "if you are tempted to play Breaking Bad, you'll end up in a Prison Break scenario"
The humorous tone made it pretty popular (more than 2 million followers today; for reference, the FBI has 1.6M). It not only reminds citizens that they're actually people like any other, but it serves as a great conduit for advise, information, and awareness campaigns.
The problem is the management (current chief of police is disliked among the police), overtime and lack of funds. The problem isn't their image - or rather, the problem of their bad image is due to the aforementioned and not their "PR-image", and even if it was what makes you think they would then deliberately try and "damage" it?
Last edited by Dezerte; 2016-05-26 at 09:24 PM.
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
Just an outsider opinion but I don't think this is a big deal. Do they come off as goofballs when they should be trying to look respectable? Perhaps, but all of us like to have a little bit of fun. I know there have been a lot of issues in Sweden, in particular with the immigration stuff, but I don't think this and that issue go hand in hand.
Criminals need to fear the police. Criminals here already do whatever the hell they want because they know the police here is very soft compared to other places. This picture in reality explains how criminals already see them while working, it's not a very good idea.
Why do you think we have so many no-go zones?
Last edited by Fojos; 2016-05-26 at 09:55 PM.