My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/KungKeno21?feature=mhee
My DeviantArt page: http://deathknightcommander.deviantart.com/
On par with if not slighty better then Avatar? What are you smoking dude, you need to get your eyes checked. So you are telling me that your CGI opinion is that a 7 year old movie is on PAR with the most cutting edge CGI movie to date? Come on man be real....just come on....Like read these lines back to yourself and think again....
Exactly. Arthas' inner thoughts are explored a lot during the novel and reveals a considerable amount of details that couldn't even be barely perceived in WC3. Same about Sylvanas. The Arthas/Uther duel is also very good and quite dramatic.
Tell that to the "this movie is 10 years late" crowd.
Last edited by Frozen Death Knight; 2016-05-29 at 06:13 PM.
My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/KungKeno21?feature=mhee
My DeviantArt page: http://deathknightcommander.deviantart.com/
Did someone post a beautiful image of Durotan and Draka laughing earlier? Would love to upload it :]
I have perfect vision, thanks I acutally fly light air-craft part-time! The visuals are just that, on-par with if not slightly better than Avatar! They used lower polygonal models but the lighting, skin/sub-surface light-scattering was better, and the faces were also far better animated. Textures were also lower resolution which is why it doesn't look as "crisp" as Avatar, but on the whole it definitely stands up. There is one scene where Blackhand and Lothar confront each other, and the lighting is so well done that they stack up against each other incredibly well!
https://twitter.com/KristianNairn/st...71877437079552
Seems like Hodor has spoken. You guys had better watch the movie if you have not already.
My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/KungKeno21?feature=mhee
My DeviantArt page: http://deathknightcommander.deviantart.com/
Well its your overall composure, im not saying you are a bad person. But you do have alot of opinions without seeing the movie.
You can pretty much graps the overall reaction from people that have seen the movie, it is good even really good for some.
When you write getting panic attacks from reviews thats when i think you went overboard, dont let your illnes take over like that.
Thus my remarks
Last edited by mmoc5cdcc17479; 2016-05-29 at 06:55 PM.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warcraft_(film)
No way, it has received MIXED reviews, only a few are negative! Wtf..."It received generally negative reviews from critics and has grossed over $31 million."
One thing that you can't truly pinpoint on Wowpedia is how important something is. You need some sort of filter. Games have it, they leave in the truly important things.
- - - Updated - - -
What counts for reviews in the movie world is critics' reviews in certified magazines, newspapers and similar. What doesn't count is random people on YouTube and the general audience. However nonsensical that may be, it simply is how it works because these people are the ones who're paid to do this stuff.
- - - Updated - - -
As well as Bran.