yes
no
No, she is not oversexualized. Same goes for all the other characters for that matter.
I'm not into skin tight leather. D.va isn't sexualized in the least. She is in a giant robot the vast majority of the time. You don't even see Her. What in the world is over sexualized about a character that wears leather while being unviewable the vast majority of the time? Are the suddenly "oversexualized" because people make porn of her?
Rule 34: If it exists, there is porn of it.
Just because there is porn of her, doesn't mean she is oversexualized. Just that people find her attractive.
Is pretty obvious what Blizzard was going for with the female characters (not all, but most). They've been quite cunning about sexualising their characters to keep the horny teenagers interested but at the same time not going for the obvious bikini clad female characters.
Most of the female characters are fully clothed BUT (in most cases) the clothes are just spray painted on. This gives the illusion that they care and whist covering their asses (no pun intended) against backlash from people that would be offended.
Offended player "These characters are oversexualised I can see their butt crack and boobs!"
Blizzard "No you can't! Our characters are fully clothed! The only skin you see is either their face or hands!"
tbh anything you fap over that isnt real is pixels be it overwatch porn or even standard porn u got off brazzers or redtube or whatever, and why should i get a GF in this day and age you could have sex with a girl and she could file a false rape case on your ass i know its a rare occurance but it does happen and im a paranoid person so il continue to enjoy fapping over pixels like many other guys do
....what? /10 chars
- - - Updated - - -
I literally have no words. I think you've been reading too much reddit. You're seriously suggesting foregoing a normal relationship with a women in case of false rape claims against you? Are you that rapey? Do you force them to do furry stuff? Have you even talked to a girl face to face before?
Last edited by willtron; 2016-05-31 at 12:50 PM.
1) Load the amount of weight I would deadlift onto the bench
2) Unrack
3) Crank out 15 reps
4) Be ashamed of constantly skipping leg day
I don't know what "over"-sexualized is really supposed to mean. Is there a clear, defined line, a standard to that?
She's definitely a highly sexualized character. Very beautiful, idealized body frame, very exposed. It's impossible not to notice that she's supposed to be freakin' hot. It's ridiculous that some people would dispute that and try to keep a straight face.
So yeah, sexualized, for sure. Which doesn't have to be a bad thing. Nothing wrong with design including a bit of eye candy. In her case, it's not particularly tasteless or vulgar or something.
why would anyone sexualize d.va when we have Mercy, i like my older onee-sans :P
If your argument is that there is porn of D.va she is over sexualized. I fear that i am the one that has to point out there is Roadhog x junk rat porn. there is even Zenyatta porn out there. I HAVE SEEN IT. are they over sexualized
She's not worse than the others, I think. In addition, she lives most of her life inside the tin can, and basically never wins POTG, so you don't see much of her except for victory poses.
Mother pus bucket!