Saying "Rape" against wow terms of use?

[Peter134]

Once again, you're conflating a conscious choice with something entirely different.

Living in your county is a choice. Same concept.

[Eleccybubb]

Companies have to abide by the laws as well you idiot.

Still their game. They can deny you access to it for whatever grounds they choose. And on topic if you went around saying it freely of course you will get suspended.

[Raelbo]

Their judgement isn't correct because it wasn't a sexually explicit comment. Do you even know what explicit means?

Dude, your comment was inappropriate. It's very clearly obvious to most people who have responded here. Why it isn't obvious to you (assuming you aren't simply being disingenuous) I can only speculate.

Your "defense" seems to consist entirely of rules lawyering. Focussing on the semantics or exact words used and ignoring the obvious. If you stab someone to death and when found guilty the judge uses the word "slice" it might be technically incorrect, but it would make you no less guilty of murder

[TEHPALLYTANK]

Living in your county is a choice. Same concept.

So being born is the same as making a conscious choice? Please explain.

[Deleted]

No you got suspended for a racial slur. Read the rules.

- - - Updated - - -



Someone is mad.

I can make any word sound racists, it simply depends on how i use them. Words themselves cannot by definition be racists of their own accord. You have to use them in a racist manner for them to be racists.

And I didn't use the word racists, I used it in replacement of knobhead.

[Kryos]

You don't even know the difference between moral relativism and moral universalism. Please go back to r/atheism and jack off to The God delusion with your neckbeard friends.

Just like you do to a made up human construct they call god? That has no prove, no fact, no nothing? Just because someone wrote something on some rolls in the middle east that's suddenly true and not just am elaborated fantasy like Games of Thrones? If you want to win an argument, you need to present hard facts. If you don't have any, you lost the argument.

[Peter134]

You deserve a ban for being a moron.

- - - Updated - - -

Just like you do to a made up human construct they call god? That has no prove, no fact, no nothing? Just because someone wrote something on some rolls in the middle east that's suddenly true and not just am elaborated fantasy like Games of Thrones? If you want to win an argument, you need to present hard facts. If you don't have any, you lost the argument.

There's no "proof" for any scientific theory or hypothesis either. Epistemological solipsism, read up on it. Also, no evidence for God? There is plenty. There is however, no proof.

[Svad]

/bg We are getting raped guys

Depends on the context I would say.

Agreed, I have said it multiple times during my time in wow, and have never been suspended for saying it.

[Peter134]

Still their game. They can deny you access to it for whatever grounds they choose. And on topic if you went around saying it freely of course you will get suspended.

Still the governments country. They can drone strike you if they want to.

- - - Updated - - -

So being born is the same as making a conscious choice? Please explain.

No one is forcing you to stay in the country. That is your choice.

[Eleccybubb]

I can make any word sound racists, it simply depends on how i use them. Words themselves cannot by definition be racists of their own accord. You have to use them in a racist manner for them to be racists.

And I didn't use the word racists, I used it in replacement of knobhead.

Doesn't matter if you used the word as a replacement. You were reported for a racist comment and got suspended. Read the rules next time.

[TEHPALLYTANK]

No one is forcing you to stay in the country. That is your choice.

So you were born with access to the servers?

[Raelbo]

Lol, the more I read of the OP's responses the more obvious it is why he got suspended. Dude, you just can't resist picking fights and then getting rude and condescending towards others. In the end you got nailed because you overstepped the bounds of acceptable language use, but really, you got banned because you have a serious inability to conduct yourself appropriately in conversation.

[DSRilk]

Dude what is so hard for you to understand? Whose "natural empathy" are we talking about? Some people oppose the death sentence, others don't. Who is right? What's immoral and immoral? Is the death sentence immoral? Why? Because you said so? People seem to have different concepts of what is wrong and what isn't. Who is right? What society? Not to mention that it's irrational and quite frankly intellectually dishonest to assume that there is an ultimate standard of right and wrong that supersedes mere fanciful "ideas" about what is right and wrong at a given time in our ethical evolution.

It's not my fault that you are too illiterate and uneducated to understand common sense. Atheism is incompatible with moral UNIVERSALISM, period. It's not incompatible with moral relativism but moral relativism makes 0 sense.

Who's natural empathy? That of human beings. People within a single religion also differ on opposition to the death penalty, does that make religion no longer a source of moral universalism? If your definition of that term is that everyone agrees, then there is no such thing. The definition is that the morality applies universally, not that it comes from a singular source. The fact that you ignore empathy doesn't make the morality derived from it any less universal.

Let's move off that for a moment though and talk about the philosophy of Humanism. A philosophy that at least some atheists follow. A philosophy that espouses a right and wrong to the universe without a divine creator. No god required. There are many other philosophies that also claim or imply universalism without divinity.

You can name call and make false assumptions about my education and literacy all day long, it doesn't make you right.

[Eleccybubb]

Still the governments country. They can drone strike you if they want to.

- - - Updated - - -



No one is forcing you to stay in the country. That is your choice.

Completely moronic comparison a game company to the military but keep trying it's making me laugh.

[Peter134]

Dude, your comment was inappropriate. It's very clearly obvious to most people who have responded here. Why it isn't obvious to you (assuming you aren't simply being disingenuous) I can only speculate.

Your "defense" seems to consist entirely of rules lawyering. Focussing on the semantics or exact words used and ignoring the obvious. If you stab someone to death and when found guilty the judge uses the word "slice" it might be technically incorrect, but it would make you no less guilty of murder

It's "obvious" to most people here because they too are brainwashed by cultural marxism. The general populous are complete idiots who don't have an aptitude for common sense (which is demonstrated in this thread).

Saying "rape" is not offensive. If that was the standard, then dictionaries would be offensive by default since they contain the word and much much worse.

[Alvito]

Context is very important. I have seen multiple qq threads on here where somebody said they got banned for saying they were going to rape somebody or their mother and got banned. It all comes down to why you use the word and then the mod that gets the ticket if somebody complains.

[Mucro]

OP is starting to remind me more and more of those sovereign citizen idiots who think they have the right to do whatever they want without repercussions.

[DSRilk]

I'm a paying customer, and by so have rights granted to me BY THE LEGAL SYSTEM. You get that, RIGHT?

Are any of those rights granted by the legal system the right to say whatever you want in a game owned by a private company? If not, then they're irrelevant to this conversation. And as a note, none of them grant you that right.

[Peter134]

Who's natural empathy? That of human beings. People within a single religion also differ on opposition to the death penalty, does that make religion no longer a source of moral universalism? If your definition of that term is that everyone agrees, then there is no such thing. The definition is that the morality applies universally, not that it comes from a singular source. The fact that you ignore empathy doesn't make the morality derived from it any less universal.

Let's move off that for a moment though and talk about the philosophy of Humanism. A philosophy that at least some atheists follow. A philosophy that espouses a right and wrong to the universe without a divine creator. No god required. There are many other philosophies that also claim or imply universalism without divinity.

You can name call and make false assumptions about my education and literacy all day long, it doesn't make you right.

Humans don't have the same empathy. Are you genuinely retarded?

[Eleccybubb]

Not believing in God is also to not believe in an absolute moral authority. Something which is necessary for moral universalism. Grab a dictionary and read.

- - - Updated - - -



Basic instincts? Talking about empathy here? I've already been over that in another post. What about evolution? What about conflicting opinions? Psychopaths who lack empathy? Also that's the naturalistic fallacy. It's still opinionated and can thus not be universal.

- - - Updated - - -



I'm a paying customer, and by so have rights granted to me BY THE LEGAL SYSTEM. You get that, RIGHT?

Actually as a paying customer you have the right of access to the WoW servers that can be terminated at any time with our without a reason.