Tomorrow I will watch the film at 5:30pm italian timezone. About two or three hours later I will write my honest review here
Do the people who are comparing Warcraft to Lord of the Rings also compare The Hobbit to Game of Thrones because they both have dragons in them?
http://mrniceguyld.wix.com/spoileral...f23b010089ad3e
Good review IMO
World of Warcraft: Shadowblands
Diablo Bore.
Yeah, Orgrim is one of the characters I thought about. He's clearly meant to shine in the sequels. Some of his most relevant acts didn't occurr in this movie yet so he had little reasons to be particularly relevant. Durotan was the star at this turn and is understandable considered the fact that he dies. For Orgrim is just a way to establish a basis, one from which he'll evolve. Even Kasinzky confirmed that Orgrim is still not Warchief material in this movie but he'll evolve in that direction in future sequels.
Also, a question for anyone who saw the movie: it was present in the movie the scene where young Medivh is initiated as new Guardian?
Well, "you can't please everyone" and this statement applies to this guy beautifully. I could go on and point out some evident flaws in his critique but I don't see the reason, we can just conclude that Warcraft isn't stuff for him.
To be fair, I would have said the same thing before reading it, but I'm surprised as well. The review is uncharacteristically balanced and surprisingly good written. Which is weird, reviews on IGN are often strikingly bipolar, they either range from "OH AWESOME" to "LOL WHAT A CRAP".
I still consider IGN a trash click-baiter site but I can't deny that I expected something different, in a way or another.
So why is UK considered a "massive market" and Germany and France arent, both have more people living in them than the UK
World of Warcraft: Shadowblands
Diablo Bore.