"stopping it" requires them to enforce it.
Good luck.
Owner of ONEAzerothTV
Tanking, Blood DK Mythic+ Pugging, Soloing and WoW Challenges alongside other discussions about all things in World of Warcraft
ONEAzerothTV
free speech means you have the right to say some hateful shit if you want, and I have the right to tell you to shut up
what we're seeing here is that a critical mass of people are not particularly interested in hear from bigots, and companies (being profit-interested) are responding to that.
frankly a lot of vile stuff gets posted on twitter and I don't find anything remotely objectionable about the company saying 'we don't want to be associated with this'
Why do you think Governments are more than eager to listen to all these SJW morons ? They'd like nothing more than censorship...
Free speech does not and never has meant that you are allowed to say anything and everything.
There are some limits and they need to be enforced. I am sick to death of all the shithead racists, for example. Cutting their access to posting shit is beneficial.
Well in the absence of using legal force, my response to people wanting to use my publishing platform (if I'm a company like Facebook, Twitter, or even MMOC) to spew their hate speech is going to be to tell them to fuck off, to delete their content, and to ban them from the site. It is my right, as the company, to determine what I want published on my site, and I'll encourage meaningful debate, not venomous hate speech.
'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
Umm, I do? Where are you getting this stuff? You assume too much, and you overestimate yourself.
- - - Updated - - -
How isn't it?
- - - Updated - - -
You didn't answer my question. Where did Theo mention legal enforcement?
Obligation to what? Freedom of Speech? Whose Freedom of Speech? Britains? USAs? Mexicos? France? Italy? Internet isn't owned by America, son. It's a free range of every country in this world. When you sign to that TOS. You agree to obey THEIR rules. IF you don't like you have two options. Protest. Don't use the site. Don't, however, just mindlessly bitch about it and complain that they're infringing on "muh freedoms".
It's not the same position, while we are both criticizing them, I am not demanding nor expecting that they they change their model. You are. I have repeatedly explained this to you. Your repeated statement of "they are the same thing" does nothing to actually demonstrate that they are and instead demonstrates a difficulty you appear to have in reading and understanding.
What are we gonna do now? Taking off his turban, they said, is this man a Jew?
'Cause they're working for the clampdown
They put up a poster saying we earn more than you!
When we're working for the clampdown
We will teach our twisted speech To the young believers
We will train our blue-eyed men To be young believers
'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
Non whatsoever. But I won't accept that their speech is equal in the highly abstract approach that "their platform, their rules" folks are taking.
And it swings both ways: Facebook is fighting hatepeach because of market pressures. They were content with hatepeach in their platform; some pressure group took to criticize that freedom, and they're changing policy. That, in the "muh platform" world, is a blatant attack on Facebook's freedom of speech. This, of course, is tacitly ignored.
Last edited by nextormento; 2016-05-31 at 08:08 PM.