What do you think mean the sentence ''reliable and to your tastes'' ?
And incidentally, the common definition of ''SJW'' seems to be ''anything left of Gengis Khan.''
i quoted the wrong part of text :P.
I was responding to one who said that all of the stuff on gawker site's was bad. Most of it was. But there where 1 time a week a nice one in the huge pill of crap.
And the other remark was: People say it only was kotaku had clickbait titels and commercials that looked like the blog post. While io9 , kotaku and jezebel all had loads of them
#MAGA
One bastion of liberal degeneracy destroyed by the Hulkster himself.
"I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. "
- General Jack D. Ripper.
Is it bad that I just had a full on Joker-esque cackle fit when I read this news?
Fucking beautiful btw, fuck gawker.
Gaming & Tech related discussion with occasional poo flinging!
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNS...PDOAsdXS7I029g
https://twitter.com/Aztech_Zero
This has nothing to do with freedom of speech and everything to do with violating moral ethics and outright trying to profit from invading someone else's privacy. That is the real issue, even though their ethics as a media outlet were often times scrutinized, leaking the Hulk Hogan sex tape tipped the boat for a lot of people, myself included. Prior to that, I couldn't give a fuck what anyone at Gawker wrote, but when they went out and tried to profit off something that was clearly stolen, that was far beyond the line of moral ethics in journalism and they got what they deserved out of it.
Personally, I don't care what political leanings people view them as, that was something I never really associated with their articles. Their articles were just fucking shit, plain and simple, and often times worse than TMZ and rivaled only by publications like the National Enquirer and People Magazine for trash tier level content.
Not everything is left vs right.
You can tell from the name "Gawker" what sort of company you're dealing with. It's circus sideshow journalism. If they were big in printed media that'd be printing celebrity gossip mags and red top tabloids. Feeding a culture of celebrity obsession and paparazzi. Dislike of rag papers and paps is not a left or right wing issue.
Ziff Davis looking to buy Gizmodo, Lifehacker, Kotaku, Jalopnik, Deadspin, Jezebel and Gawker. These sites probably won't be going anywhere in the near term if this happens.
Bankruptcy in the US doesn't mean that a business is shutting down. Just look at Trump.
If it wasn't for their criminal activities, and that people took them as more than a tabloid, I wouldn't mind them at all.
- - - Updated - - -
A J2 company? heh, so are any companies without a past thick with criminal misconduct interested in buying Gawker? First we had the Russian materials holding company that specializes in armed take overs, and now we have a company that uses punishing cancellation fees to defraud consumers and a history of fraudulent patent suits. I guess everyone needs a faux news PR branch every once in awhile.
Brotha, what are you gonna do when these size 47 pythons come for you?!?
Crash and burn like you should.
Actual blue mod response on doing what they volunteered to do. No wonder this place is infested.Originally Posted by Venara