How does a guy who has been questioned twice in 2013 and 2014, and is on a terror watch list legally buy a gun?
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
The problem with this is that Islam/Quran itself advocates for killing homosexual people. The Bible no where indicates white supremacy (particularly since the people of the Bible were all...well...Middle-Easterners.)
That is, the KKK has no real Biblical basis whereas ISIS has basis in Islamic teachings. At BEST, you could argue the KKK used the social order clause (the same thing that supports paying taxes - "render unto Caesar"), and Paul sending a letter to Philemon pleading for compassion for the escaped slave Onesimus (since questioning slavery in Roman times was...just not a thing). The KKK used this as justification for slavery, this is true, but that's all they had.
There was no direct command in the Bible to have slaves, to support slavery, or to lynch black people. Indeed, the Bible has explicit counters to things like this (for example "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" would seem apt when asking oneself "should I hang this black person for no good reason?")
Again, there's no comparison at all.
...and that's before realizing that the KKK has been in decline for decades and is no serious power in the modern world ANYWHERE while radical Islam is, and ISIS, in particular, is in a struggle and basically a de-facto country, as well as an outpost in Libya and another in Afghanistan, with more fighters scattered around in places like Yemen.
And that's JUST ISIS - we're not even talking Al Qaeda and Boko Haram, here.
When the KKK takes over half of Georgia and declares and runs themselves as an independent state, while also having an outpost colony in Portugal and another in Quebec. Oh, and while other radical Christian groups are fighting civil wars in Eastern Europe - Poland, perhaps? - and have terrorist cells scattered across greater Russia, Europe, the US/Canada, and Australia. Oh, and when a new book of the Bible is discovered that says white people are the supreme race, black people should be killed, slavery should be legal everywhere, etc.
When THAT happens...then we can state an equivalence with the KKK and ISIS.
Until then, white supremacy is in decline and the KKK is an empty group with no power and no backing in the Christian texts...and ISIS has a good deal of power, radical Islam is a thing, and has backing in the Muslim scriptures.
.
ALL.
THAT.
SAID:
I'm just responding to a false equivalence post. None of this even matters right now...
(I'm not even sure, honestly, why I bothered to respond to it, much less in such depth.)
Have you been paying attention to Europe? Countries were literally given quotas. And he's a "native born citizen" with a father that aligns himself with the Talibans. Also you'll find out that usually 2nd or 3rd generation immigrants are much worse than their parents... and those are "native citizens".
Our situation is not Europe
Guess who else was aligned with the Taliban around the time his father was a young man.And he's a "native born citizen" with a father that aligns himself with the Talibans.
Why scare quotes? He's as much an American as anyone else.Also you'll find out that usually 2nd or 3rd generation immigrants are much worse than their parents... and those are "native citizens".
Yeah, you know why they were "given quotas" and from who? The union that they all belong to, that decided as a group to take in refugees. Not the REFUGEES. Christ. "people chose to do something, horror ensues when they do it!".
If the 2nd and 3rd generation are consistently failing, the problem isn't REFUGEES. the problem is that the native countries are failing utterly at helping to assimilate. It's a 2-way street, and a child doesn't decide he's not going to be part of a society on his own.
Everyone is asking what we could do to stop this. The hard truth is, there is nothing we can do. We could round up all Muslims and those who are mentally ill, but that has lead to worst things in the past. Trump's Muslim ban would not have stopped this. Banning semi autos would not have stopped this.
We live in a free society, if a person who has never committed a crime before decides to go crazy and start shooting people, there is nothing we can do to stop.
I always go back to legally blond in this situation. Happy people do not kill people. It is a stupid quote, but true. If we work on reducing stress, being more accepting, and reducing income inequality, it would actually do a lot. When people are less stressed by economic situations, sexual situations, and other aspects of their lives. Maybe they will see things improve.
Seeriously? There's LITERALLY a wiki entry on exactly this. Spoiler alert, it doesn't suggest tolerance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homose..._New_Testament
Last edited by Eviscero; 2016-06-13 at 03:13 AM.
The one thing I've never seen adequately explained from the pro-gun side is why other countries don't have similar stats to the USA regarding violence and homicide. I frequently read and hear that stricter gun laws and fewer guns in the country wouldn't matter because of "XX" and "YY" reason. In this case, they blame his religion and other things. With other crimes it's always something other than guns.
If this were true then other wealthy countries with stricter laws and fewer guns would have stats like the USA, right? Or at least somewhat close. I'm referring to crimes like homicide. Even those including firearms because something else we hear frequently is that removing guns only takes them out of the hand of law abiding citizens. Criminals will still have and use those guns.
So if any of this was remotely true then every other wealthy country would have our crime stats regarding homicide and firearm related crimes. We even share a border with Canada. If gun laws wouldn't help then they should have our murder rates and firearm crimes. So should Japan, or Australia, or ...