What are we gonna do now? Taking off his turban, they said, is this man a Jew?
'Cause they're working for the clampdown
They put up a poster saying we earn more than you!
When we're working for the clampdown
We will teach our twisted speech To the young believers
We will train our blue-eyed men To be young believers
protect in ways that dont cause lethal or severe permanent damage, yes.
Unfortunately, whether any of the people at Pulse own a gun or have a CCW, they would still not have been able to legally carry inside. It would still have been the same bloodbath, which is why asshats like to shoot schools, movie theaters and bars. They are counting on the fact that nobody is armed. One guy in there with a knife could have made all the difference.
Also a good idea, though I'm not sure how much manpower would be required to go out and inspect gun owners' methods of gun storage. Too many people get killed because they (or someone else like a parent or some such) put their weapons somewhere easy to access without locking them behind something.
What are we gonna do now? Taking off his turban, they said, is this man a Jew?
'Cause they're working for the clampdown
They put up a poster saying we earn more than you!
When we're working for the clampdown
We will teach our twisted speech To the young believers
We will train our blue-eyed men To be young believers
shes kinda wrong about her comment on the Germans thing. She said it would be better to refer to the Nazis and not the whole country. She apparently doesnt realize the german army were not the Nazis...they were an army...of Germany. We fought both in the war.
EDIT: ok i dunno what happened to the post with the video so this will probably be confusing lol.
Keep the masses in fear and they will consume.
I'm pretty sure everyone supports this who doesn't have some sort of bias against said community....
I used to work with a man who's partner actually had to kill one and injure another thug in a home invasion. Cops had found cinder-blocks, rope and duck tape in the trunk of the thugs vehicle.
Sometimes people need self-defense and in the cases of individuals who may fall victim to hate crimes this may be even more true.
Even if they buy more guns, though, that's not what you're alluding to. You're trying to promote open/conceal carry and are hoping said community is a vessel of such, due to a tragedy.
Do we really want a society where people have to bring guns to the dance club. (Wondering where some people are going to hide said guns.) I mean, maybe, someday it will be so bad all of us will have to bring guns to the; grocery store, beach (Now I want to know where people are going to hide those guns....), hair salon, mall, etcetera, out of paralyzing fear. We can even pack a hand gun in our children's bags with their school lunches, but who actually wants to see that happen?
Soft targets, are soft targets because people feel safe there and they should be able to. If it comes to the point where people can't walk into a store or daycare without a gun, because they fear the government/the man/crazy people/ minorities, then we've got more important problems as a country than concealed/open carry laws. Not sure why we wouldn't work towards a better future, as opposed to an anti-utopia wild-west where everyone needs to be armed 24/7 out of paranoia and fear.
Last edited by -Nurot; 2016-06-16 at 03:25 AM.
This is great news! For people who think we need gun control because guns kill people :
Milo is our based gay on the right. If I was in America I would have seen him on his 'dangerous faggot' college tour where he was triggering sjw's. Twitter suspended his account yesterday and apparently the backlash from the gay community forced them to reinstate his twitter account, albeit with ~30k less subscribers for some reason.
Here are some sjw's having an intelligent and well put together debate with Milo while on his college tour. Wish I was there to see this spectacle.
I may not agree with what you say but I will fight to the death to defend your right to say it.
*Quoted for the meme, not directed at personally.
I never understood the meme: "Guns, don't kill people, people kill people."
Well, yes, sure, but why would you willingly sell guns to a suspected terrorist, or someone on a no-fly list.
This also means "Guns don't save people, people save people." So why is it everyone who clutches onto this meme for dear life, usually trying to shove NRA type thinking onto everyone. It's just another hollow meme that means absolutely nothing. Like the "Good guy with a gun" meme.
Terrorists should get to own guns, because they'll get them anyways and cause destruction even without guns, like with, knives and bombs? So the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a gun?
Can't the good guy save the day without a gun? If the bad guy gets to buy one legally because he might use a knife, couldn't the good guy use a knife? (Rhetorical jest, since the initial argument is just as comical)
Just because these people from a community owned guns doesn't mean they would bring them to the club, even if it was legal.
*Amidst; dancing, bumping and grinding.... "Is that a gun in your pocket, or are you happy to see me?" ---"Well of course its a gun, we live in the wild-west in the 1800s don't we?"
It almost feels like victim blaming. Are we really at the point where we're telling the victims - You probably should have had a gun, so it's your fault. We don't want to fix anything, so just buy a gun and strap it on permanently and learn to be this imaginary "good guy", when you're in danger in a life-or-death situation and only have seconds to react.
There is no inherent wisdom or logic in that line of thinking. I guess when you have no other solutions other than ban Muslims (like Trump), as a response to stopping a New York born shooter, then there isn't much credence placed in your critical thinking skills, in the first place.
Last edited by -Nurot; 2016-06-16 at 04:05 AM.
You didn't bother to read it at all, did you? What it says is exactly true. A group that identifies itself as an LGBT Gun Club has more than doubled in members over the weekend. That definitely sounds like it fits "Gun sales surge among LGBT community" to me. Whether or not this is just a small sample or the ONLY increase so far, we don't know.
Quit trying to stir up shit, it just makes you look ignorant.
I'm sure these "good guys with guns" will prevent more mass shootings!
Like the 200 or so that happened in 2015 in a nation with almost as many guns as people. But somehow there never seems to be any good guys with guns around when those happen. I guess they're too busy at home spamming internet forums with bunk arguments that don't pass casual inspection.
Or you know, during America's 10,000 or so homicides every year.
Not much choice in a country where any psycho can get his hands on a gun easily, is there?
This is always one of those stupid loaded questions that implies you have no right or ability to defend yourself without a gun.
Edit: Of course in a country where we have a political party that pushes for psychos and criminals to be able to buy, it's pretty hard to defend yourself without one. Meanwhile in pretty much every country you can still defend yourself easily without one.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Seems silly. The places where they congregate are also the places where they usually can't take them. A rather irrational choice, well like most gun purchases.