Not in all states.
And do it and see how many people call the cops out of fear. You say that like it is common knowledge that someone walking around with a rifle, downtown, in a major city, is perfectly accepted by all.
So your explanation amounts to nothing. It is like saying that "technically, it's not illegal for a guy to walk around screaming about aliens and brandishing a pocket knife on the sidewalk," but do that shit and see how quick the cops get involved.
- - - Updated - - -
Nah, logical solutions are not a part of the agenda.
Freedom is never free.
Cliche, but I really don't have another answer to that.
But for the record I've had direct family members die to a gun.
- - - Updated - - -
That is not how it works, they want other people with guns, to come and take your guns. lol
Nobody cares about taking away your guns unless you are some psycho, or do you want crazy people to buy guns freely.
- - - Updated - - -
We love the military
But we need all the guns we can to slaughter them.
- right wing logic
ou this simplifying and generalizing everything sure is fun no wonder you guys like it.
Define Crazy?
How do you determine if a person is crazy? When someone that has no history of being crazy, or having a criminal record, goes and buys a gun and commits murder, how could you have prevented that?
Do you understand what you are saying?
You just said that you don't want this guy's gun. Let's say 2 years from now, he goes Alahu Ackbar and shoots up a place? What will you say then? Cause hindsight is a motherfucker.
You're flailing. You wanted him to monitored indefinitely. I'm saying start watching him when he buys guns. What is so ridiculous about that? The guy didn't wait years. We could have stopped him, by simply adding gun purchases to the flagging system. Your hypotheticals aren't actually dealing with what happened.
typical.
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
That's actually wrong as fuck. They don't trust the government and admit freely that most soldiers will not turn guns on the populace. Meanwhile liberals have this idea that the military will shoot up their family and firends.
A better example would be
But I don't expect logic from you guys.We love the military
We will not fund their care once they leave service
- Conservative logic.
right now as the status quo anyone can get a gun it's harder to get your driver's license and buy a car than it is to become a gun owner. does that seem right to you? Or is it that you don't understand that every hoop they have to jump through is another chance at stopping them or lowering the body count?
Last edited by Draco-Onis; 2016-06-16 at 12:42 PM.
Typical of what?Typical.
I don't really care how other countries run their governments, their laws, or their cultures. If I did I would move there.
- - - Updated - - -
Why is it harder to buy a car?
I don't recall getting a drivers license or buying a car being overly difficult. I'd say they are about the same as buying a gun.
I'll say this again since you guys aren't really paying attention.
He was on an FBI watch list. If he had tried to buy airline tickets a red flag would have popped up and the FBI would have intervened or followed. If the same system worked for guns this would have been stopped.
Contrary to popular belief, FB is not the government or FBI. 911 dispatchers aren't the FBI either.
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
I dealt precisely with what you said. That isn't a dodge.
Its a typical dodge. I'm asking you a specific question, and you're turning that question into something else. I don't care where you want to live and it has fuck all to do with my point. Now maybe you understand what a dodge is.
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
"Djalil do you still beat your wife?"
Loaded questions like these are fun I know.
You won't like the answer to that question nor do I feel like being bombard with unwarranted insults calling me a psychopath, so I'll leave it to your imagination.
- - - Updated - - -
Just a little FYI for all of you:
So they said their stance on this has not changed and they approve of sale blocks on people on the watch list. However people here keep saying it is the NRA that was preventing it?NRA Statement on Terror Watchlists
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 15, 2016
Fairfax, Va.— The executive director of the National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action, Chris W. Cox, released the following statement regarding terror watchlists:
View Related Articles
We are happy to meet with Donald Trump. The NRA's position on this issue has not changed. The NRA believes that terrorists should not be allowed to purchase or possess firearms, period. Anyone on a terror watchlist who tries to buy a gun should be thoroughly investigated by the FBI and the sale delayed while the investigation is ongoing. If an investigation uncovers evidence of terrorist activity or involvement, the government should be allowed to immediately go to court, block the sale, and arrest the terrorist. At the same time, due process protections should be put in place that allow law-abiding Americans who are wrongly put on a watchlist to be removed. That has been the position of Sen. John Cornyn (R.-Tex.) and a majority of the U.S. Senate. Sadly, President Obama and his allies would prefer to play politics with this issue.
This may come as a surprise, but I am not a NRA member and never plan to be, so I can only go based on what I find on the internet.