Well, it's happening, Trump is starting to lose bad in the polls..

[Mormolyce]

Increasingly nervous man for the seven millionth time this year

Only this time, the nervous man in question is Trump.

[Zyster]

I think this statement itself could be considered a conspiracy...

Dun dun dunnnnnn

[Pangean]

Considering how corrupt Hillary is nothing would surprise me.

Nicely played.

[Soeroah]

Never understood how Americans can cope with two years of campaigning. Australia's currently has two months from the start of campaigning to the election and it's being called unnaturally long.

[Wells]

Never understood how Americans can cope with two years of campaigning.

Stockholm Syndrome.

[Pangean]

Never understood how Americans can cope with two years of campaigning. Australia's currently has two months from the start of campaigning to the election and it's being called unnaturally long.

It's called Single Malt.

[ringpriest]

The problem that you either don't realize or understand, this is the quite before the storm. This is where Trump should be building his organization (well have built it) which he hasn't. He should be doing tons of fundraising. He hasn't. He was given a list of 20 GOP heavyweight donors to call. He gave up after 3. He should be ensuring his campaign team is squeaky clean, instead we find out one of his super pacs is run by one (Steven Hoffenberg) of the largest ponzi schemers in the history of the US. He should be working to shore up the GOP pols who normally would be acting as a surrogates for himself. Instead he is attacking these folks and making it impossible for them to associate themselves with him, let alone act as a surrogate for him.

It's almost like he is tanking his candidacy on purpose.

If he becomes President, his plan to launch Trump News (or whatever he's going to call it) is a complete non-starter, plus he'd need to actually work and be exposed as an incompetent fraudster. If, on the other hand, he loses (especially if he can blame that loss on "Democrat fraud" or "Republican treachery", he'll be well positioned for such an effort.

[Pangean]

If he becomes President, his plan to launch Trump News (or whatever he's going to call it) is a complete non-starter, plus he'd need to actually work and be exposed as an incompetent fraudster. If, on the other hand, he loses (especially if he can blame that loss on "Democrat fraud" or "Republican treachery", he'll be well positioned for such an effort.

Yeah lot of speculation on that going on right now. Him working on this at this point in a campaign sure points to him tanking on purpose.

[PC2]

Because people like you believe "leftists" are "anti-military" is where you will fail.

Glad to hear I'm wrong and that leftists support the military.

[Cheerbleeder]

The most accurate poll out there, that we can physically see, is Social Media - Facebook and Twitter. Trump is boot stopping Hillary in followers, *liked posts, etc. It's not even close. The only other people I can think of that break 100k 'likes' per post is Arnold Schwarzenegger, Michelle Lewin, & Vin Diesel. (I'm sure there are a few others). But yeah, that paints a picture of reality, instead of some bullshit poll put out by god knows who.

[Wells]

The most accurate poll out there that we can physically see is Social Media. Facebook and Twitter

How.......about......no.......

[Cheerbleeder]

How.......about......no.......

Deny reality all you want. Facebook is a click away. Numbers don't lie.

[DesMephisto]

I wasn't even talking about the 2nd amendment. I was talking about the first, where he wants to ban Muslims from entering the country, and banning certain media sources. That is a clear violation of the 1st amendment.

- - - Updated - - -



These polls are after what he said and the attack, his polls are still going down. Sorry but Trump is losing.

Hate speech is the first amendment. Which shouldn't be protected.

[Wells]

Deny reality all you want. Facebook is a click away. Numbers don't lie.

"Likes" aren't polls. I'm not sure how to tell you this.

[Pangean]

The most accurate poll out there, that we can physically see, is Social Media - Facebook and Twitter. Trump is boot stopping Hillary in followers, *liked posts, etc. It's not even close. The only other people I can think of that break 100k 'likes' per post is Arnold Schwarzenegger, Michelle Lewin, & Vin Diesel. (I'm sure there are a few others). But yeah, that paints a picture of reality, instead of some bullshit poll put out by god knows who.

Lol you have some actual evidence to support this ..er..unique claim?

[Sky High]

Hate speech is the first amendment. Which shouldn't be protected.

lol no. rather not be like Europe on that front.

[Orbitus]

The most accurate poll out there that we can physically see is Social Media. Facebook and Twitter. Trump is boot stopping Hillary in followers, liked posts, etc. It's not even close. The only other people I can think of that break 100k 'likes' per post is Arnold Schwarzenegger, Michelle Lewin, & Vin Diesel. (I'm sure there are a few others). But yeah, that paints a picture of reality, instead of some bullshit poll put out by god knows who.

Wait, you actually think that social media likes, means he can win? Did you know you can make multiple emails to make multiple accounts to like something more? I mean even Redstate says that the Washington Free Beacon did a study and found that 64% of Trump's Twitter followers are fake, or have been inactive for over 6 months. http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/...fake-inactive/ Apparently you can buy 2500 fake followers for $39.

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

Glad to hear I'm wrong and that leftists support the military.

Republicans have this nasty habit of twisting being against sending soldiers out to die in pointless wars into not supporting the troops. If someone is going to die in service to their country it should be for something more valid than oil prices.

[Orbitus]

Deny reality all you want. Facebook is a click away. Numbers don't lie.

And I just debunked your numbers with your own sides sources.

- - - Updated - - -

Hate speech is the first amendment. Which shouldn't be protected.

Sorry but how does that refute what I said, or even make fucking sense?

[PC2]

Republicans have this nasty habit of twisting being against sending soldiers out to die in pointless wars into not supporting the troops. If someone is going to die in service to their country it should be for something more valid than oil prices.

The military is already planning on slowly reducing personnel over the long run in favor of machine warfare. It will be less of an issue as time goes on.