Anyone voting out these are your mates. Fuck off the planet you cunts.
the guy who killed her has been named, his first name is tommy i cant remember his last name but i saw it on the news
- - - Updated - - -
you sound like your not old enough to vote or have any idea how politics works,just cos a leave campaigner killed an MP doesnt mean all leave campaigners are psycho's
Oh no, some scrub is calling me an idiot. Look at the knife crime in the UK vs the knife crime in the US, and then come back and try not to look like a fucking jackass
- - - Updated - - -
Just because you ban something, doesn't mean crime isn't going to happen a different way. But you already knew that, right m8?
You stepping into the wrong reply. First off, this was a reply to some scrub calling me out - secondly - since you dove right in without looking at who I quoted, or what context it was in: When you pass a law in a part of the world such as an Assault Rifle Large Capacity Magazine ban like California has done, it doesn't mean you couldn't just go across the border to NV, buy a 100drum mag, fill it with ammo, come back across the border to your place of business: IE San Bernadino - and slaughter your entire party in the name of IsIs.. The ban is only stopping law biding citizens from getting the protection they needed in the first place, BAD people will get this shit just as easily, and then you have nothing you can do against them.
- - - Updated - - -
Hey I'm not disagreeing that we don't need something in place to control the guns in murica, I'm saying FULL banning guns.. Come on now....
Gun control, as far as it is used in the Western world, is not a full ban on guns.
In response to your reply to Jessicka, which ties in with this, any legislation needs to be done on a national level, not on a state level. We do not have the same issue in the UK, as we only have four "states", all of whom have legislation on the matter that was agreed nationally and implemented so that it is co-ordinated.
This is interesting and relates to your point. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36558386 The 2nd item on the invoice appears to show that he was (at least intermittently) interested in improvised weaponry for at least 16 years. I think buffers and controls that act as a delay between motivation(probably fleeting) and action saves lives. And if anyone argues that "he still killed someone" well that is true but I doubt it would have taken the same time frame if the means had been more readily available to him and let's face it: he isn't unique and it's about ameliorating the risk such people present.
No it is not, you are just demonstrating a lack of knowledge in respect of firearms usage in the UK.
Bolt action rifles and shotguns are used in work that is important to parts of the economy, so there is little chance that either will be prohibited. In comparison, the ban on semi-automatic weapons following Hungerford affected very few people and the ban on handguns after Dunblane mostly affected hobbyists, which meant both could be restricted without widespread problems.