NATO did not invade Iraq, that was a seperate coalition, Kosovo was in the middle of a genocide, if you think that you were protecting Russians in Crimea when you took it, then you should have no problem understanding why NATO got involved in Yugoslavia, it's not like NATO was sitting in Greece hoping for war to break out in Yugoslavia so they could start bombing someone.
Libya was a shitcase from the start, I've got no idea how it should have been handled nor do I think what was done was the correct thing, but that's obvious when you look at current Libya, but odd enough it did have a UN mandate, altho they went beyond the mandate.
I doubt any western media have come out and said that Russia taking Crimea was worse than Nazi Germany, if so they live in another reality (But I'm guessing you're just exaggerating here
)
- - - Updated - - -
Better invade Crimea than sorry? better support a civil war in Ukraine than sorry? Yeah doesnt really work that way mate, especially when you think that NATO will attack Russia.