Anonymous attacks Hillary Clinton

[Blobfish]

Good to see the people from Anonymous know involvled with bringing
this bitch down



https://www.reddit.com/r/Documentari...ating_hillary/

[PC2]

Indeed, bringing down the establishment favorite is quite ambitious.

[Mistame]

Ah, cannibalism. When trolls/criminals/dirt bags eat their brethren.

[Espe]

<snipped garbage>

From the second reply on reddit echoing most of the other responses in the thread:

You have to be incredibly stupid about how Google works to believe this. Snopes corrects the record

[Fargus]

From the second reply on reddit echoing most of the other responses in the thread:

Ah so because Dan Evon says it's so, it must be 100% factually correct?

[Deleted]

They made a video and put it up on Youtube. Come on. That's not an "attack". I mean, Anonymous hardly ever does anything, but they do at least actually DDoS someone every now and then, and you could call that an "attack".

Uploading a video on Youtube isn't worth calling an "attack".

[Rukh]

Ah so because Dan Evon says it's so, it must be 100% factually correct?

Here's a link to google: https://www.google.com/

Try it yourself.

[Fargus]

Here's a link to google: https://www.google.com/

Try it yourself.

I'd much rather discuss this with a programmer who is actually qualified to talk about all the technicalities, rather than some random writer from Snopes.

[Deleted]

They made a video and put it up on Youtube. Come on. That's not an "attack". I mean, Anonymous hardly ever does anything, but they do at least actually DDoS someone every now and then, and you could call that an "attack".

Uploading a video on Youtube isn't worth calling an "attack".

When was the last time they did something of worth? They just scream empty threats these days.

[timberx]

Here's a link to google: https://www.google.com/

Try it yourself.

I tried to get it to autocomplete "Donald Trump lawsuit" for me. Instead, I got lawyer, laws, and lawrenceville nj. Fucking lol.

- - - Updated - - -

I'd much rather discuss this with a programmer who is actually qualified to talk about all the technicalities, rather than some random writer from Snopes.

This has nothing to do with the technicalities of the code. It's whether or not Google is manipulating search results in favor of Clinton, which has been proven to be not true, as they manipulate search results for everyone!

[Rukh]

I'd much rather discuss this with a programmer who is actually qualified to talk about all the technicalities, rather than some random writer from Snopes.

It takes you ten seconds to verify for yourself. Your head is buried in the sand.

[Fargus]

This has nothing to do with the technicalities of the code. It's whether or not Google is manipulating search results in favor of Clinton, which has been proven to be not true, as they favor search results for everyone!

Nothing to do with it?

You need to understand it in order to manipulate it in the first place, hence asking for clarification from someone with actual knowledge in this field. Explanations from a random guy from Snopes, or you, isn't adequate enough for me personally.

[belfpala]

I tried to get it to autocomplete "Donald Trump lawsuit" for me. Instead, I got lawyer, laws, and lawrenceville nj. Fucking lol.

- - - Updated - - -



This has nothing to do with the technicalities of the code. It's whether or not Google is manipulating search results in favor of Clinton, which has been proven to be not true, as they manipulate search results for everyone!

You can just finish typing the word you want in the search.

[Fargus]

It takes you ten seconds to verify for yourself. Your head is buried in the sand.

No, I am seeking knowledge to how it actually works from a coding perspective.

[belfpala]

Explanations from a random guy from Snopes, or you, isn't adequate enough for me personally.

Then go try it yourself.

[timberx]

You can just finish typing the word you want in the search.

And you can do that for "Hillary Clinton criminal," too. That's not the point.

[Deleted]

Nobody cares about anonymous anyway.

[wowaccounttom]

:/ the google algorithm is adaptive and two people searching for the same thing, based on their search history and location, will get different things

[PC2]

A Google search is a snapshot in time. It wouldn't prove or disprove manipulation over time. Either way the issue is about Hillary, not Google.

[Al Gorefiend]

Good to see Anonymous is at it again - doing the laziest, completely irrelevant thing that does absolutely nothing (probably performed by a single person a la Fappening) then have the millions who claim themselves to be a part of the group take equal credit.