Tough one if EU goes to soft it will encourage others to try it but on the other hand if there seen as to harsh many will use it to try and show the EU as a negative entity and use that to encourage more people to leave. So basically the EU needs to navigate between being seen as a wimp or a bully.
Their new trope is "Accountability" forgetting the fact we elect MEPs, and MPs and conveniently forgetting the House of Lords and the fact we'll have a PM soon that no-one voted for in Boris. Oh and the fact that we'll still be subject to EU regulations if we want to access the Common Market except now we won't have a seat at the table.
Last edited by Shadowmelded; 2016-06-25 at 12:21 PM.
Last edited by mmoc8116b97f51; 2016-06-25 at 12:35 PM.
Daily Mail readers with their holiday homes are now panicking at the misinformation.
>implying that every 16-17 year old would have voted remain
>implying that every 16-17 year old would have even turned up to vote
My generation have provided me with the most lols the past 2 days. Complaining old people "fucked it up" for them, when only 25% of them could be arsed getting themselves to the polling station.
And why should leave have required 60%, but not remain? This is not democracy.
That's the requirement for the House of Parliament to demand a General Election. It's not strange or unusual to put such thresholds on such big decisions away from the status quo.
Not that I agree with it, I'm a pretty ardent Federalist, but it is what it is and we need to hurry up and decide what to do with it, not flip flop around for 10 years making up our minds. Which frankly, is something that should have been done long before the referendum was called.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland