You can probably count those cases on the fingers of one hand. The only instances I recall are those where the deportation is effectively a death sentence. We don't do the death penalty in this country. In more recent cases, assurances were obtained from the government to whom we were deporting them which were accepted by the European Court, and the deportation went ahead.
Even within the UK the referendum was an advisory one.
Of course the government will look beyond stupid if they ignore it, but it's not binding.
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
But honestly, 4 months to do what?
The PM isn't that important for negotiations. Those will be done by experts that are already in place. They can actually start the negtiations. Those won't start anyways before the UK calls for Act 50.
There's no real chance for a change in mind aside of ignoring the vote, something i believe would be political suicide. So he could just start it. Honestly, investors are going to treat the UK anyways as if they aren't in the EU and the earlier they are out, they can have some results. There will be a hard period anyways. But it will be longer if the government just tries to delay the process.
I'm ashamed to be British. I don't class myself as a Brit anymore, I'm EUROPEAN. I hope that europeans won't meet me on my travels and be like disgusting a Brit accent.
Dumbest fucking decision ever. Old, ignorant, nationalist pigs in my opinion that voted Leave. OR just plain stupid and had no idea what they were voting for.
Broken Kingdom.
We need a PM to set the vision, explain the goals, and give us targets. Right now the Leave camp have already dropped basically all their pledges for what they said they were going to do. No money for the NHS, no changes to immigration, and they want to remain in the EEA. So we need to ask what the fuck did we leave for?
Oh I believe it'll go through, but until it does nobody can go changing anything about the leaving process.
Then once we're in the leaving process unless there's some very funky stuff going on it will follow the regulations that were in place when the process began.
All this talk in this thread of other nations changing the leaving process whilst it's going on just isn't how these things work.
What they can do is send armies of lawyers to search every dotted i and crossed t of the existing regulations to look for anywhere they can find an advantage or loophole. That could just end up being a colossal waste of time though. One would hope that the UK government had fully inspected the leaving process for anything like that prior to even suggesting a referendum.
Last edited by klogaroth; 2016-06-25 at 11:08 PM.
Both ways could have the same result. In one, they are blamed for ignoring the vote. In the other one, they will be blamed for leaving EU and all the negative effects without real improvements.
It's been discussed a lot. If they want back into the EU single market, they'd have worse conditions than they have now - for sure. Everything else is a lie. Only 1 EU member has to decline the british conditions. It is even possible that one EU member could veto their access completely. UK would need to persuade ALL 27 members to their conditions.
Both ways could be suicidal. But at least: if they follow the vote they can still blame the leave voters. xD Doesn't sound very clever though if you want to win an election.