CNN’s Clinton Cash ‘Fact-Check’ Ends in Embarrassment

[Dhrizzle]

So basically, Trump was wrong, and Breitbart does not disappoint in continuing to be the biggest piece of shit on the internet.

Trump was wrong but CNN was wrong about why he was wrong.

[I Push Buttons]

Since you just want to attack sources here is the New York Times piece on it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...pany.html?_r=0

So the moral of the story is, if you donate to the Clinton Foundation you are no longer allowed to participate in the world economy without being accused of bribery for every transaction forever?

Also from your article:
"Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.”"

Lol... What could he possibly gain from sensationalizing any of this? Oh yeah... A lot of money.



Oh look, a few weeks after that article on May 5 when his book came out:
"Clinton Cash debuted at number two on the New York Times Best Seller list."

[Tempguy]

Trump was wrong but CNN was wrong about why he was wrong.

Holy shit. Can we go one more level?

Glad it wasn't just me and this isn't as straight forward as I feared.

[Blur4stuff]

well if giving money to the Clintons or their foundation eliminates you from consideration then Trump has to drop out of the race

[Vyxn]

So the moral of the story is, if you donate to the Clinton Foundation you are no longer allowed to participate in the world economy without being accused of bribery for every transaction forever?

Also from your article:
"Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.”"

Lol... What could he possibly gain from sensationalizing any of this? Oh yeah... A lot of money.



Oh look, a few weeks after that article on May 5 when his book came out:
"Clinton Cash debuted at number two on the New York Times Best Seller list."

when it is case after case after case of individuals or companies donating to the Clinton foundation or pay extortionate amounts for speeches from the Clintons then have political decisions made in their benefit that H. Clinton had at least some involvement in it stops being coincidence and becomes a pattern

[lockedout]

when it is case after case after case of individuals or companies donating to the Clinton foundation or pay extortionate amounts for speeches from the Clintons then have political decisions made in their benefit that H. Clinton had at least some involvement in it stops being coincidence and becomes a pattern

I thought it was just a witch hunt?

[Orbitus]

I thought it was just a witch hunt?

It still is, but most of us on this forum are now ignoring you because you are wrong so FUCKING MUCH. Just because they are getting donations to the Clinton Foundation means NOTHING. They can't touch that money.

[lockedout]

It still is, but most of us on this forum are now ignoring you because you are wrong so FUCKING MUCH. Just because they are getting donations to the Clinton Foundation means NOTHING. They can't touch that money.

Donations buy influence.

[Cthulhu 2020]

when it is case after case after case of individuals or companies donating to the Clinton foundation or pay extortionate amounts for speeches from the Clintons then have political decisions made in their benefit that H. Clinton had at least some involvement in it stops being coincidence and becomes a pattern

So what you're saying is, everyone else can benefit from political bribery and success, but Clinton can't.

- - - Updated - - -

Donations buy influence.

I'm wondering how you're going to stop our presidential election then, given that Hillary is bad but Trump is much much worse. Unless you're voting for Trump because you think he's a shining beacon of hope that hasn't accepted bribes, lied, cheated on taxes, utilizes undocumented migrant labor, etc.

[Orbitus]

Donations buy influence.

Really now? You have any sort of evidence to suggest that? Because if that is the case, then Trump is also fucked. Considering he was PERSONALLY BAILED OUT OF DEBT by the same Saudis that donated to the Clinton Foundation. The thing is, Clinton can't touch that fucking money. While Trump did.
http://addictinginfo.org/2016/06/15/...you-out-twice/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0010e80e99806
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...s-monarch.html
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-c...s-donald-trump
http://fortune.com/2016/01/29/donald...-saudi-prince/

You really should pick your battles more wisely. You just didn't check before you started typing. Much like EVERYTHING you post.

[Krastyn]

Really now? You have any sort of evidence to suggest that?

Do you honestly believe that donations do not buy influence?

[Orbitus]

Do you honestly believe that donations do not buy influence?

Kinda hard to buy any influence when they can't touch the money for anything. Again, like I said, Trump has been more influenced by the Saudis than Clinton probably has been.

[Krastyn]

Kinda hard to buy any influence when they can't touch the money for anything. Again, like I said, Trump has been more influenced by the Saudis than Clinton probably has been.

Really? What makes you think the money can't be touched?

[Orbitus]

Really? What makes you think the money can't be touched?

Simply because nothing has been shown to be the case. While we have proof of Trump corruption with his "Trump Foundation". Since he used it to buy off the Florida AG to drop her case against him.

[Krastyn]

Simply because nothing has been shown to be the case. While we have proof of Trump corruption with his "Trump Foundation". Since he used it to buy off the Florida AG to drop her case against him.

Ah. Because you can't see corruption, it's not happening. Keep your ears plugged, and eyes closed.

[Cthulhu 2020]

Ah. Because you can't see corruption, it's not happening. Keep your ears plugged, and eyes closed.

Trump supporters criticizing Clinton for this is a bit like a murderer criticizing a shop lifter.

[Venant]

Do you honestly believe that donations do not buy influence?

A CPA or lawyer that blatantly disregarded conflicts of interest to the extent that Hillary Clinton has, would be locked up in prison with likely hundreds of charges arrayed against him/her.

- - - Updated - - -

Trump supporters criticizing Clinton for this is a bit like a murderer criticizing a shop lifter.

You are living in deep denial if you think people are really paying the Clintons hundreds of thousands of dollars per hour because they make such lovely speeches.

[Orbitus]

Ah. Because you can't see corruption, it's not happening. Keep your ears plugged, and eyes closed.

Says the guy defending Trump, lol. I mean he could walk up to your mother, shoot her in the face, and you would probably still vote for him. Simply because Hillary MIGHT be a criminal. Yet, of the 2, which one is currently under investigation in many states, has 2 lawsuits against them, 1 criminal and 1 civil. Then he criticized his judge, which NO ONE should ever do. Its a good way to guarantee that they fuck you in the ass for the MAXIMUM penalty.

[Venant]

Says the guy defending Trump, lol. I mean he could walk up to your mother, shoot her in the face, and you would probably still vote for him. Simply because Hillary MIGHT be a criminal. Yet, of the 2, which one is currently under investigation in many states, has 2 lawsuits against them, 1 criminal and 1 civil. Then he criticized his judge, which NO ONE should ever do. Its a good way to guarantee that they fuck you in the ass for the MAXIMUM penalty.

And Hillary Clinton has the blood of hundreds of thousands of people on her hands, due to pushing for civil war in Syria and Libya. Her emails that have been leaked make it clear that she pursued a policy of destabilizing the region in order to benefit Israel's political position.

[Orbitus]

And Hillary Clinton has the blood of hundreds of thousands of people on her hands, due to pushing for civil war in Syria and Libya. Her emails that have been leaked make it clear that she pursued a policy of destabilizing the region in order to benefit Israel's political position.

Really? She pushed for the civil war in Syria and Libya? It wasn't the oppressive dictators that pushed for the civil war? Also, just in case you forgot, Trump was also for it before he was against it.