Originally Posted by
Skroe
If only he were that smart.
Really David Cameron is an idiot.
Three times he called votes he wasn't sure he was going to win. He lost twice and narrowly one once.
Before I get to the example, let me state that if holding a consequential vote is in your power, and you haven't actually counted the votes yet to make sure you're going win, then your action of holding that vote is the very height of political malpractice. Leaving it up to fate if you win or not isn't more or less democratic. In parliaments the world over, in Congress, arguments are held and debated, but the vote is only held when the majority is fairly certain that it has the votes to carry it's motion.
Three times in the past three years David Cameron had this choice before him. Twice he blew it, once he narrowly got away with it.
The first time was over the bombing of Syria in late 2013 (Obama's 'red line' moment). Now put aside if you think that is a good idea or not for a moment. After it became clear the UN wouldn't approve it, the next forum for approval, like Operation Allied Force in 1999, became NATO. And for whatever reason, instead of unilaterally authorizing it, as he is empowered to, David Cameron rushed and held a vote on the matter... a vote that he didn't actually count the 'Yeas' and 'Nays' before proposing. He wanted to bomb Syria, but he went into that room guessing he perhaps could win. He lost badly and unexpectedly, and didn't just derail US Syrian policy that day, but single handedly de-NATOized the entire affair, because all NATO decisions must be unanimous. The Syrian-authorization debate then shifted to Barack Obama, being the spineless weasel that he is, looked for Congressional approval at a time Congress wasn't ready to give him squat (something he knew: he just wanted political cover to do nothing). Thank you David Cameron.
The second time was the Scottish Referendum. Never needed to be held. Polls were not in it's favor. The chance of it happening, and the resulting consequences (to the UK and the US) looked so remote, that David Cameron basically didn't campaign for months. Didn't take it seriously. It was in the last few weeks, when the Pro-Independence side rapidly closed the poll gap, that the hapless David Cameron shockingly realized that *gasp* this might happen! In the end it wasn't his speeches or his campaigning that snatched victory from the jaws of an unexpected defeat. It was Labour former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, a Scott himself, who delievered one of the best political unity speeches of the decade. Independence narrowly lost, and David Cameron's reckless, pointless gamble that didn't need to happen, was saved by his predecessor.
And now we have the third time, and the bomb finally went off.
David Cameron's political malpractice is truly epic. This is incompetence. Not genius. He was holding votes to reaffirm the position the already had, when he simply legally, morally, politically didn't have to. He didn't have to seek approval for bombing Syria, especially when the British Armed Forces, hamstrung by years of pointless cuts, would have made a small contribution at best. He didn't have to gamble on a Scottish Referendum that threatened to rip apart the UK itself. He didn't have to gamble on a EU referendum when Conservatives had been whining about the EU for decades already (as if that was anything new). Especially not in this toxic political environment where extremist anti-elite know-nothingism is sweeping the West.
If nothing else, hopefully this is a lesson for the rest of the Western World: the biggest example of "Play Stupid Games, Win Stupid Prizes". David Cameron played Stupid games for years, and he won stupid prizes, for years. No more stupid referendums. No more pointless show votes. No more letting extremists forces have their day.