Originally Posted by
TheDestinatus
Oh gawd, this is funny. Orcs are cave beasts, they always have been and always will be. The confusion you're feeling is Blizzards inability to follow a story and they just jump back and forth between "good and evil" because it creates longevity, and the lore readers love it to pieces because they think they are stumbling onto some secret reasoning to why the story changes like that.
Orcs are bad, always have been and they always will be. The orcs wanted to go to war in WC1, WC2, WC3 (they complained all the time about not having humans to fight), and in WoW. The Thrall philosophy for whatever it is only matters as long as he is in charge, as soon as someone else takes over they go right back to what they were doing before. I'm sure someone will be along to protest but even the WoD short stories showed them for exactly what they were, Durotan killed his own wolf, Kilrogg killed his own father, the Orcs of WoD followed Hellscream without question even without the demon taint, attacked the Draenei without demon taint, etc etc etc. They commited all the same acts without the taint as they did in the main timeline with it. They are bad by default, Thrall is the only reason for the difference. Them trying to make Orgrim a good guy is just laughable as he was the largest contributor to the Human genocide, leading the raids and horde in WC1 and WC2.