Oh look a daily mail article. The epitome of truth and facts
Oh look a daily mail article. The epitome of truth and facts
where did you get this fact from?
See http://www.newstatesman.com/politics...-eu-referendum
What was voter turnout across age groups?
Update: 26/6: Social media is passing round a stat that only 36 per cent of 18-24 year olds voted. Given that this age group was the most likely to vote Remain, this would imply that if turnout had matched that of higher age groups, Remain coudld have triumphed.
However, it's not quite as simple as that - this is not real turnout data, and we will in fact never know exactly what proportion of each age group voted. Some quick background: at General Elections, representatives from political parties stand outside polling stations asking for your voting ID number, and collate this information country-wide to figure out who voted (and guess how, based on canvassing data). However, they tend not to at one-off votes, such as referendums, and didn't on Thursday.
The source for the referendum's supposed turnout data is Sky Data, which tweeted this out today:
Follow
Sky Data @SkyData
% who got through our final #EUref poll turnout filter by age group:
18-24: 36%
25-34: 58%
35-44: 72%
45-54: 75%
55-64: 81%
65+: 83%
2:45 PM - 25 Jun 2016
2,495 2,495 Retweets 1,516 1,516 likes
Sky isn't claiming this is collected data - it's projected, and a subsequent tweet said it was based on "9+/10 certainty to vote, usually/always votes, voted/ineligible at GE2015". I've asked for more information on what this means, but for now it's enough to say it's nothing more than a guess. Graphics from the BBC show that areas with younger populations generally had lower turn-out, but that's the closest we have to hard-and-fast data on youth turnout.
David Cameron had the last laugh, he's set his successor up to fail.
If his successor invokers article 50 = career suicide
If his successor does not invoke article 50 = career suicide
Seems crafty Dave had the last laugh.
This will go one of 3 ways now
1) David Cameron's successor invokes article 50, Scotland and Northern Ireland both leave, we find out just how we the UK will do.
2) David Cameron's successor asks Brussels to allow the UK to remain in the EU, Brussels tells X to fuck off politely, we get a messy breakup and not very favourable trade deals.
3) David Cameron's succesor asks Brussels to allow the UK to remain in the EU, Brussels demands even more powers than it had before AND removes the UK's right to VETO until it earns it back.
None of which is good. People sharp forget that the referendum was not legally binding, it was just an advisory exercise and can LEGALLY be ignored if the government really want.
I don't think he is at all stupid. I think the eccentricity is played up and there is a more Machiavellian side to him he keeps hidden away.
In his spare time I see him drinking brandy and watching the original House Of Cards, cheering as Francis Urquhart murders the journalist.
Parliament will not over turn it. There is too much to lose in the way of votes for it. Honestly this vote should never have happened in the first place. Leave campaign looks like it doesn't know what to do. Remain campaign MPs are all but discredited in England and Wales. The only one looking good out of this is the SNP in Scotland and maybe Sinn Fein in republican areas of Northern Ireland.
UK. Now openly home to Stormfront.
nope they do it for sure, but imagine that USA instead of a POTUS had a council with all the governors of the 50 states that need to be nearly unanimous to make a simple decision and each one had veto power and each one will weight it's decision in it's own national consensus prospective, that would be so ridiculous that would make house of card and game of thrones look a decent alternative.
That is what we have in Europe.