Do they teach black kids about affirmative action? How about that kids perceive them as more socially competent (or more masculine in general)?
I am absolutely fucking boggled by that article.... Segregating "KOC" kids???
I remember in school having a set of classes that that aimed to teach about discrimination. However, what the teachers did for its purposes was to split the group up on arbitrary stuff: eye colour or, as we had a couple of uniform options, those who were wearing the sweatshirt rather than the jumper and tie. They then proceeded to have different treatment for each group including getting out 5 minutes early. The race,gender,sexuality,religion stuff was thrown on right at the end with everyone mostly left to make the inference themselves: "discrimination is shitty, don't be a dick."
If I had the time, and balls, I would knock up some handouts along the lines of the material in the article and put them in our kids' school bags for my missus to find and record her reaction.
I am aware of these things. That doesn't change the fact that if you are black today, then, all other things equal, you will have a harder time succeeding in life, due to societal biases. Just because of a few awards that caused the uproar, you don't suddenly get a different society with all old prejudices gone.
It really depends which part of society. A very liberal one will praise you, and given a white kid all things being equal the black one will be preferred.
- - - Updated - - -
Which gets to my point - if you avoid both those traps you are incredibly advantaged compared to the more average guy
Assuming this is true for all members of the ethnic group for the moment, the same can be said for short people, fat people (genetically predisposed), ugly people, etc.
We don't have government policies in place to lift these groups, as far as I'm aware.
As Nixx suggested, I think everyone should be encouraged to judge others by their merit and not their physical characteristics (unless physical characteristics translate into merit, though this is more rare). But when it comes to ethnic groups (and other groups too if we had the policies in place), it seems like applying policies of generalization simply validates generalizations - both positive and negative, no? And encourages the ethnic group in question to identify by their ethnicity instead of their merit?
No, sorry, but it has nothing to do with liberalism. And people who do that do not form a significant percentage of people anyway.
Well, there is a difference between things that are result of your actions in life, and things that are your inherent properties which you can't naturally change. I don't think people should be judged at all for the latter, and for the former, while judgment kind of makes sense, outright discrimination is still not something I want to see happening.
And I totally agree, policies of generalization will lead nowhere. The society itself should change towards acceptance of everyone, and not the policies trying to "counter" societal biases by compensating the discriminated groups with something others do not have.
One area I'd love to see more research into is how the psychology of colour (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_psychology) plays into this. Of course race in society goes beyond this, but it might give us some insight into the basic attributions made subconsciously that are isolated from social constructs.
Last edited by Varvara Spiros Gelashvili; 2016-07-03 at 03:18 AM.
Violence Jack Respects Women!
This thread is the latest example of the internet giving mental illness a voice.